IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7500-d1138721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Performance Quality Index to Assess Professional Conduct of Contractors at Sustainable Construction Projects in Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Essam Shaawat

    (Department of Building Engineering, College of Architecture & Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia)

  • Saleh Mohammed Saed Alqahtani

    (Department of Building Engineering, College of Architecture & Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia)

  • Altayeb Qasem

    (Department of Building Engineering, College of Architecture & Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rehan Jamil

    (Department of Building Engineering, College of Architecture & Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulaziz S. Almohassen

    (Department of Building Engineering, College of Architecture & Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia)

  • Umaru Mohammed Bongwirnso

    (Department of Building Engineering, College of Architecture & Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The quality performance of contractors in sustainable construction projects is a major concern for the industry. Over the past decade, studies on measurements, factors, and indicators for assessment of the professional conduct of construction companies are to be found in the sustainable construction management literature. There is adequate evidence over the last decade that an increasing number of construction professionals have adopted the measurement of the professional conduct of contractors as a tool to support their future decisions. The method of the Analytical Hierarchy (AHP) process has been deployed to identify the major factors and sub-factors involved in sustainable construction in Saudi Arabia. Using several governing factors, including quality of document submittals (QDS), quality system implementation (QSI), and quality of construction works (QCW), a working framework was developed by using the pair-wise comparison method. The results show that proper accountability and keen consideration of factors that could hinder sustainable construction by contractors contribute to the development of a better perspective on quality issues. After a critical analysis, a Performance Quality Index was developed, and a benchmark value was obtained. The benchmark value of PQI will assist project managers and owners in the sustainable construction sector as a reference for future improvement in the quality performance of contractors.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Essam Shaawat & Saleh Mohammed Saed Alqahtani & Altayeb Qasem & Rehan Jamil & Abdulaziz S. Almohassen & Umaru Mohammed Bongwirnso, 2023. "A Performance Quality Index to Assess Professional Conduct of Contractors at Sustainable Construction Projects in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-11, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7500-:d:1138721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7500/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7500/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Czajkowska & Marta Kad³ubek, 2015. "Management Of Factors Affecting Quality Of Processes In Construction Enterprises," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 11(1), pages 28-38, June.
    2. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Afiqah R. Radzi & Abdelrahman M. Farouk & Noor Suraya Romali & Mohamed Farouk & Mohamed Elgamal & Rahimi A. Rahman, 2024. "Assessing Environmental Management Plan Implementation in Water Supply Construction Projects: Key Performance Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jelena Lukić & Mirjana Misita & Dragan D. Milanović & Ankica Borota-Tišma & Aleksandra Janković, 2022. "Determining the Risk Level in Client Analysis by Applying Fuzzy Logic in Insurance Sector," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Luo, Xu & Ge, Zhexue & Zhang, ShiGang & Yang, Yongmin, 2021. "A method for the maintainability evaluation at design stage using maintainability design attributes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    3. Parham Fami Tafreshi & Mohammad Hasan Aghdaie & Majid Behzadian & Mahdieh Ghani Abadi, 2016. "Developing a Group Decision Support System for Advertising Media Evaluation: A Case in the Middle East," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1021-1048, September.
    4. Aleksandar Aleksić & Danijela Tadić, 2023. "Industrial and Management Applications of Type-2 Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Techniques Extended with Type-2 Fuzzy Sets from 2013 to 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Olga Porro & Francesc Pardo-Bosch & Núria Agell & Mónica Sánchez, 2020. "Understanding Location Decisions of Energy Multinational Enterprises within the European Smart Cities’ Context: An Integrated AHP and Extended Fuzzy Linguistic TOPSIS Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-29, May.
    6. Yuan-Wei Du & Yi-Pin Fan, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Agricultural Sustainability Assessment: A Study across 30 Chinese Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Targetti, Stefano & Schaller, Lena L. & Kantelhardt, Jochen, 2021. "A fuzzy cognitive mapping approach for the assessment of public-goods governance in agricultural landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Pengyun Chong & Hui Yin & Chaofeng Wang & Pengcheng Wang & Linqing Li & Di Wu & Jingwei Li & Dong Ding, 2022. "Evaluation of Social Stability Risk of Adjusting Goods Vehicle Calculation Method Based on Optimal Combination Weighting—Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Shuyang Yu & Dan Wang, 2022. "Quantitative SWOT Analysis on Factors Influencing the Sustainable Development of Non-Academic Education in China’s Open Universities: A Case Study of Beijing Open University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis A. & Mun, Johnathan & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2017. "Active management in state-owned energy companies: Integrating a real options approach into multicriteria analysis to make companies sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 487-502.
    11. Umberto Di Matteo & Sofia Agostinelli, 2022. "Big Data Analysis for Optimising the Decision-Making Process in Sustainable Energy Action Plans: A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Approach Applied to Sicilian Regional Recovery and Resilience Plans," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Madjid Tavana & Mehdi Soltanifar & Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga, 2023. "Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 879-907, July.
    13. Guo, Jian & Luo, Cheng & Ma, Kaijiang, 2023. "Risk coupling analysis of road transportation accidents of hazardous materials in complicated maritime environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    14. Jing-Wei Liu & Che-Wei Chang & Yao-Ji Wang & Yi-Hui Liu, 2022. "Constructing a Decision Model for Health Club Members to Purchase Coaching Programs during the COVID-19 Epidemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    15. Dewey Wollmann & Maria Teresinha Arns Steiner, 2017. "The Strategic Decision-Making as a Complex Adaptive System: A Conceptual Scientific Model," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-13, January.
    16. Germán Álvarez-López & Alejandra María Múnera & Juan G. Villegas, 2023. "Multicriteria Decision-Making Tools for the Selection of Biomasses as Supplementary Cementitious Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    17. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "Measuring the Environmental Maturity of the Supply Chain Finance: A Big Data-Based Multi-Criteria Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, April.
    18. Muryani Muryani & Khoirun Nisa’ & Miguel Angel Esquivias & Siti Hafsah Zulkarnain, 2023. "Strategies to Control Industrial Emissions: An Analytical Network Process Approach in East Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Muwen Wang & Kecheng Zhang, 2022. "Improving Agricultural Green Supply Chain Management by a Novel Integrated Fuzzy-Delphi and Grey-WINGS Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Wang, Junqi & Cao, Hongjun, 2022. "Improving competitive strategic decisions of Chinese coal companies toward green transformation: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7500-:d:1138721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.