IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p600-d1316281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Environmental Management Plan Implementation in Water Supply Construction Projects: Key Performance Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Afiqah R. Radzi

    (Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Abdelrahman M. Farouk

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Kuantan 26300, Malaysia)

  • Noor Suraya Romali

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Kuantan 26300, Malaysia)

  • Mohamed Farouk

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia
    Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11517, Egypt)

  • Mohamed Elgamal

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rahimi A. Rahman

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Kuantan 26300, Malaysia
    Faculty of Graduate Studies, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh)

Abstract

Assessing the implementation of environmental management plans (EMPs) in construction projects is crucial for meeting environmental sustainability goals and reducing potential adverse impacts. By using performance indicators (PIs), stakeholders can objectively measure the performance of EMP implementation, identifying areas of success and areas that may require improvement. Therefore, this study aims to examine the PIs for assessing EMP implementation in water supply construction projects, using Saudi Arabia as a case study. Data from semi-structured interviews and a systematic literature review were used to develop a potential list of PIs. Then, the PIs were used to create a survey and distributed to industry professionals. Data from 112 respondents were analyzed using mean ranking analysis, the normalization method, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE). Eighteen critical PIs for assessing EMP implementation in water supply construction projects were identified, including public safety, road safety hazards, construction waste, clogged drainage, irregular flooding, the spilling of chemical substances, slope failures, soil erosion, landslide occurrence, increased schedule waste, changes in the color of bodies of water, oil/fuel spills, restricted site accessibility, the smell of run-off water, traffic accidents on construction sites, the spread of disease, changes in the color of run-off water, and overflowing silt traps. The EFA revealed that PIs can be grouped into three underlying constructs: fluid-related indicators, health and safety-related indicators, and site environment-related indicators. The FSE results confirmed that all PIs are between moderately critical to critical. This study’s significance lies in its examination of PIs that aim to improve the environmental performance of water supply construction projects. Understanding which indicators are most effective allows for targeted improvements, helping to minimize negative environmental impacts and ensuring sustainable practices. Finally, this study is a pioneer in examining the critical PIs for assessing EMP implementation in water supply construction projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Afiqah R. Radzi & Abdelrahman M. Farouk & Noor Suraya Romali & Mohamed Farouk & Mohamed Elgamal & Rahimi A. Rahman, 2024. "Assessing Environmental Management Plan Implementation in Water Supply Construction Projects: Key Performance Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:600-:d:1316281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/600/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/600/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamed Essam Shaawat & Saleh Mohammed Saed Alqahtani & Altayeb Qasem & Rehan Jamil & Abdulaziz S. Almohassen & Umaru Mohammed Bongwirnso, 2023. "A Performance Quality Index to Assess Professional Conduct of Contractors at Sustainable Construction Projects in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Isabel Gallego, 2006. "The use of economic, social and environmental indicators as a measure of sustainable development in Spain," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 78-97, May.
    3. Mohamed Marzouk & Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader & Mohamed El-zayat & Ahmed Aboushady, 2017. "Erratum: Marzouk, M., et al. Assessing Environmental Impact Indicators in Road Construction Projects in Developing Countries. Sustainability 2017, 9 , 843," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-1, September.
    4. Vivian Tam & C. M. Tam & L. Y. Shen & S. X. Zeng & C. M. Ho, 2006. "Environmental performance assessment: perceptions of project managers on the relationship between operational and environmental performance indicators," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 287-299.
    5. Kim Maund & Thayaparan Gajendran & Graham Brewer, 2018. "Key Issues for Implementation of Environmental Planning Policy: Construction Management Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdelrahman M. Farouk & Afiqah R. Radzi & Noor Suraya Romali & Mohamed Farouk & Mohamed Elgamal & Raouf Hassan & Mazen M. Omer & Rahimi A. Rahman, 2024. "Performance Indicators for Assessing Environmental Management Plan Implementation in Water Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Asri Syahmi Asnor & Mohammad S. Al-Mohammad & Saffuan Wan Ahmad & Saud Almutairi & Rahimi A. Rahman, 2022. "Challenges for Implementing Environmental Management Plans in Construction Projects: The Case of Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Ajay Kumar & Jyotirani Gupta & Niladri Das, 2022. "Revisiting the influence of corporate sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: An evidence from the global energy sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3231-3253, November.
    4. Hepu Deng & Feng Luo & Santoso Wibowo, 2018. "Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making for Green Supply Chain Management under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Cristina Ciocirlan & Caroline Pettersson, 2012. "Does Workforce Diversity Matter in the Fight against Climate Change? An Analysis of Fortune 500 Companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 47-62, January.
    6. Guoyou Qi & Saixing Zeng & Xiaodong Li & Chiming Tam, 2012. "Role of Internalization Process in Defining the Relationship between ISO 14001 Certification and Corporate Environmental Performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 129-140, May.
    7. William Alomoto & Angels Niñerola & Laia Pié, 2022. "Social Impact Assessment: A Systematic Review of Literature," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 225-250, May.
    8. Sijia Guo & Xueqing Wang & Lipeng Fu & Yunfeng Liu, 2019. "How Individual’s Proactive Behavior Helps Construction Sustainability: Exploring the Effects of Project Citizenship Behavior on Project Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Ebru Saygili & Elif Uye Akcan & Yucel Ozturkoglu, 2023. "An Exploratory Analysis of Sustainability Indicators in Turkish Small- and Medium-Sized Industrial Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Kamil Pochwat & Sabina Kordana-Obuch & Mariusz Starzec & Beata Piotrowska, 2020. "Financial Analysis of the Use of Two Horizontal Drain Water Heat Recovery Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Lara Tarquinio & Domenico Raucci & Roberto Benedetti, 2018. "An Investigation of Global Reporting Initiative Performance Indicators in Corporate Sustainability Reports: Greek, Italian and Spanish Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Agus Ganda Permana & Jangkung Raharjo, 2023. "Integrated Waste Management System with IOT-Based Centralized Control towards a Smart Eco Campus-Telkom University," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(2), pages 322-333, March.
    13. Lei Li & Ting Chi & Meng Zhang & Shi Wang, 2016. "Multi-Layered Capital Subsidy Policy for the PV Industry in China Considering Regional Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Karaman, Abdullah S. & Kilic, Merve & Uyar, Ali, 2020. "Board attributes, CSR engagement, and corporate performance: What is the nexus in the energy sector?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    15. Matthias S. Fifka & Maria Drabble, 2012. "Focus and Standardization of Sustainability Reporting – A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom and Finland," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(7), pages 455-474, November.
    16. Carlos de Miguel Ramos & Rafael Laurenti, 2020. "Synergies and Trade-offs among Sustainable Development Goals: The Case of Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Isabel Ma García‐Sánchez, 2008. "Corporate social reporting: segmentation and characterization of Spanish companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 187-198, July.
    18. Sarkar, Apurbo & Azim, Jony Abdul & Asif, Abdullah Al & Qian, Lu & Peau, Anamika Kor, 2021. "Structural equation modeling for indicators of sustainable agriculture: Prospective of a developing country’s agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    19. Xuedong Liang & Xianli Zhao & Min Wang & Zhi Li, 2018. "Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Sustainable Supply Chain Financing Decision Based on Triple Bottom Line Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Giovanni Zampone & Giuseppe Sannino & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2023. "Exploring the moderating effects of corporate social responsibility performance under mimetic pressures. An international analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 53-65, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:600-:d:1316281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.