IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7298-d1134611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI-Based Degradation Index from the Microstructure Image and Life Prediction Models Based on Bayesian Inference

Author

Listed:
  • Junsang Yu

    (Data Analytics Team, Doosan Enerbility, Changwon 51711, Republic of Korea
    Department of Applied Data Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Republic of Korea)

  • Hayoung Oh

    (College of Computing and Informatics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

In this study, we propose a consistent and explainable degradation indexing method and a non-destructive-based degradation and creep-life prediction method from extensive destructive test (creep-rupture) data of a nickel-based superalloy (DA-5161 SX), an extreme-environment material. High-temperature components made of nickel-based superalloys that operate in extreme environments (e.g., gas turbine blades) deteriorate over time and shorten the life of the device. To ensure the safety and efficiency of the equipment, it is important to predict the lifetime of high-temperature parts, and a consistent and explanatory degradation index and a reliable predictive model that can predict the degree of degradation and life without destructive testing of high-temperature parts are needed. As the degradation of nickel-based superalloys progresses, degradation indices reflecting the geometrical characteristics are required that focus on the fact that the shape of the gamma-prime phase becomes longer and larger. A representative value of the degradation index was selected through parameter inference based on a Bayesian method, and the high-dimensional degradation index of previous studies was simplified to only one dimension. The robustness of the degradation index quantification model was verified by confirming that the degradation index obtained from 20% of the test images had the lowest change rate of the degradation index obtained from 80% of the training images at 6.9%. The basis for predicting the life of high-temperature parts without destructive testing was established in the degradation index and life prediction model by connecting environmental conditions and degradation indices/the LMP (Larson–Miller parameter) to represent creep life in regression models. Gaussian process regression (GPR) models based on sampling-based Bayesian inference performed well in terms of both RMSE in the degradation index and the LMP prediction model, demonstrating robust behavior in performance variation. This may be used as a key health factor that indicates the soundness of diagnostic solutions in the future, and it is expected to be a foundational technology for decision-making models for maintenance, repair, and disposal.

Suggested Citation

  • Junsang Yu & Hayoung Oh, 2023. "AI-Based Degradation Index from the Microstructure Image and Life Prediction Models Based on Bayesian Inference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-40, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7298-:d:1134611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kang, Do Won & Kim, Tong Seop, 2018. "Model-based performance diagnostics of heavy-duty gas turbines using compressor map adaptation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1345-1359.
    2. David J. Hand & Heikki Mannila & Padhraic Smyth, 2001. "Principles of Data Mining," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 026208290x, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Jeong Ho & Kim, Tong Seop, 2019. "A new approach to generate turbine map data in the sub-idle operation regime of gas turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 772-784.
    2. Fernandez del Pozo, J. A. & Bielza, C. & Gomez, M., 2005. "A list-based compact representation for large decision tables management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(3), pages 638-662, February.
    3. Le, Hong Hanh & Viviani, Jean-Laurent, 2018. "Predicting bank failure: An improvement by implementing a machine-learning approach to classical financial ratios," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 16-25.
    4. Li, Hui & Sun, Jie, 2009. "Hybridizing principles of the Electre method with case-based reasoning for data mining: Electre-CBR-I and Electre-CBR-II," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 214-224, August.
    5. Xue, Puning & Zhou, Zhigang & Fang, Xiumu & Chen, Xin & Liu, Lin & Liu, Yaowen & Liu, Jing, 2017. "Fault detection and operation optimization in district heating substations based on data mining techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 926-940.
    6. Min-feng Lee & Guey-shya Chen & Shao-pin Lin & Wei-jie Wang, 2022. "A Data Mining Study on House Price in Central Regions of Taiwan Using Education Categorical Data, Environmental Indicators, and House Features Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Caruso, Germán & Scartascini, Carlos & Tommasi, Mariano, 2015. "Are we all playing the same game? The economic effects of constitutions depend on the degree of institutionalization," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 212-228.
    8. MARIA Dan Stefan, 2009. "Improving The Quality Of The Decision Making By Using Business Intelligence Solutions," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 996-1000, May.
    9. M. Almiñana & L. Escudero & A. Pérez-Martín & A. Rabasa & L. Santamaría, 2014. "A classification rule reduction algorithm based on significance domains," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 397-418, April.
    10. Silvia FIGINI & Ron S. KENETT & Silvia SALINI, 2010. "Integrating operational and financial risk assessments," Departmental Working Papers 2010-02, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    11. Tasadduq Imam, 2021. "Model selection for one‐day‐ahead AUD/USD, AUD/EUR forecasts," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1808-1824, April.
    12. Onur Doğan & Hakan Aşan & Ejder Ayç, 2015. "Use Of Data Mining Techniques In Advance Decision Making Processes In A Local Firm," European Journal of Business and Economics, Central Bohemia University, vol. 10(2), pages 6821:10-682, January.
    13. Doumpos, Michael & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2011. "Preference disaggregation and statistical learning for multicriteria decision support: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(3), pages 203-214, March.
    14. Nieminen, Paavo & Pölönen, Ilkka & Sipola, Tuomo, 2013. "Research literature clustering using diffusion maps," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 874-886.
    15. Patricia E. N. Lutu & Andries P. Engelbrecht, 2013. "Base Model Combination Algorithm for Resolving Tied Predictions for K -Nearest Neighbor OVA Ensemble Models," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 517-526, August.
    16. Pooyan Ramezani Besheli & Mehdi Zare & Ramezan Ramezani Umali & Gholamreza Nakhaeezadeh, 2015. "Zoning Iran based on earthquake precursor importance and introducing a main zone using a data-mining process," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(2), pages 821-835, September.
    17. Adrien Jamain & David Hand, 2008. "Mining Supervised Classification Performance Studies: A Meta-Analytic Investigation," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 25(1), pages 87-112, June.
    18. Fang, Jiali & Jacobsen, Ben & Qin, Yafeng, 2014. "Predictability of the simple technical trading rules: An out-of-sample test," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 30-45.
    19. Marcin Chlebus & Zuzanna Osika, 2020. "Comparison of tree-based models performance in prediction of marketing campaign results using Explainable Artificial Intelligence tools," Working Papers 2020-15, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    20. Silvia Figini & Roberto Savona & Marika Vezzoli, 2016. "Corporate Default Prediction Model Averaging: A Normative Linear Pooling Approach," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1-2), pages 6-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7298-:d:1134611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.