IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5363-d1100293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To Dispose or to Reuse? Analyzing the Life Cycle Impacts and Costs of Disposal, Sterilization, and Reuse of Electrophysiological Catheters

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Lalman

    (Eberly College of Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, 201 Old Main, State College, PA 16802, USA)

  • Hirushie Karunathilake

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Katubedda, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka)

  • Rajeev Ruparathna

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada)

Abstract

Given the growing ecological footprint of anthropomorphic activities, considering the environmental impacts of any process is becoming increasingly important. This is especially true for the healthcare industry, whose objective of maintaining human health standards is impeded by its own unsustainable practices. To this end, life cycle analysis is particularly helpful. There have not been many life cycle analyses performed on a healthcare device or on medical procedures. Many medical devices are single use, which leads to a significant waste management problem, particularly as plastic is widely used in their composition. The objective of this study is to present a life-cycle-thinking-based approach to compare the environmental impacts associated with single-use electrophysiological catheters with the sterilization of reusable electrophysiological catheters using hydrogen peroxide, ethylene oxide, and peracetic acid. A life cycle assessment was conducted considering different use, disinfection, and disposal scenarios for electrophysiological catheters, using ReCiPe midpoint and endpoint analysis with the SimaPro software. The findings indicate that using single-use disposable electrophysiological catheters, instead of sterilizing a single catheter using either ETO or hydrogen peroxide and reusing multiple times, is preferable from a purely environmental perspective. However, the costs reduce drastically when equipment is sterilized and reused instead of disposing them after using one time. This in turn illustrates that depending on the process, sanitizing and reusing medical devices may not always be more resource-efficient than single device usage. From a cost perspective, ETO sterilization has the lowest costs, and yet it leads to an aggregate environmental impact of over 20 times compared to the single-use scenario, mainly due to the required detoxification process. The outcomes of this research will assist the health care industry in identifying the most suitable operational procedures considering patient safety, economics, and environmental stewardship, and in developing policies and guidelines for a more sustainable healthcare sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Lalman & Hirushie Karunathilake & Rajeev Ruparathna, 2023. "To Dispose or to Reuse? Analyzing the Life Cycle Impacts and Costs of Disposal, Sterilization, and Reuse of Electrophysiological Catheters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5363-:d:1100293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5363/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5363/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stougie, Lydia & Tsalidis, Georgios A. & van der Kooi, Hedzer J. & Korevaar, Gijsbert, 2018. "Environmental and exergetic sustainability assessment of power generation from biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PB), pages 520-528.
    2. Anna Schulte & Daniel Maga & Nils Thonemann, 2021. "Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Circularity Assessment to Analyze Environmental Impacts of the Medical Remanufacturing of Electrophysiology Catheters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Eduardo P. Olaguer & Amy Robinson & Susan Kilmer & James Haywood & Doreen Lehner, 2019. "Ethylene Oxide Exposure Attribution and Emissions Quantification Based on Ambient Air Measurements near a Sterilization Facility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Matthew J Eckelman & Jodi D Sherman & Andrea J MacNeill, 2018. "Life cycle environmental emissions and health damages from the Canadian healthcare system: An economic-environmental-epidemiological analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cassandra L. Thiel & David Sheon & Daniel J. Vukelich, 2025. "Simple Steps Towards Sustainability in Healthcare: A Narrative Review of Life Cycle Assessments of Single-Use Medical Devices (SUDs) and Third-Party SUD Reprocessing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jessica F. Davies & Forbes McGain & Jillian J. Francis, 2023. "Consensus on Prioritisation of Actions for Reducing the Environmental Impact of a Large Tertiary Hospital: Application of the Nominal Group Technique," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Guoxian Cao & Chaoyang Guo & Hezhong Li, 2022. "Risk Analysis of Public–Private Partnership Waste-to-Energy Incineration Projects from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Michael Saidani & Harrison Kim, 2022. "Nexus Between Life Cycle Assessment, Circularity, and Sustainability Indicators—Part I: a Review," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1143-1156, September.
    4. Or, Zeynep & Seppänen, Anna-Veera, 2024. "The role of the health sector in tackling climate change: A narrative review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    5. Jun Li & Lixian Wang & Yong Chi & Zhaozhi Zhou & Yuanjun Tang & Hui Zhang, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Advanced Circulating Fluidized Bed Municipal Solid Waste Incineration System from an Environmental and Exergetic Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Fan, Yee Van & Jiang, Peng, 2020. "The energy and environmental footprints of COVID-19 fighting measures – PPE, disinfection, supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    7. Robert H. Sarikas & Elizabeth Tipton & Andy Fodor & Arsen M. Djatej, 2023. "Sustainability Methodologies and Sustainability-linked Senior Management Compensation Policies: An Analysis of Relationships for Global Companies in the Healthcare and Educational Services Sectors," Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(1), pages 82-109, December.
    8. Wei Li & Desheng Xue & Xu Huang, 2018. "The Role of Manufacturing in Sustainable Economic Development: A Case of Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Benedetto, Vera & Ferrè, Francesca & Nuti, Sabina, 2024. "Including environmental and social sustainability in the planning process of healthcare services: A case study of cancer screening programs in an inner area in Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Masoumeh Vali & Khodakaram Salimifard & Amir H. Gandomi & Thierry J. Chaussalet, 2022. "Care process optimization in a cardiovascular hospital: an integration of simulation–optimization and data mining," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 685-712, November.
    11. Cassandra L. Thiel & David Sheon & Daniel J. Vukelich, 2025. "Simple Steps Towards Sustainability in Healthcare: A Narrative Review of Life Cycle Assessments of Single-Use Medical Devices (SUDs) and Third-Party SUD Reprocessing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Maria Chanioti & Georgios Nikolelis & Ioanna Mitsika & Maria Antoniadou, 2025. "The Role of Dentists in Promoting Environmental Awareness and Climate Consciousness for Sustainability," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 3645-3669, August.
    13. Florence Degavre & Suzanne Kieffer & David Bol & Rémi Dekimpe & Charlotte Desterbecq & Thibault Pirson & Georgiana Sandu & Sandy Tubeuf, 2022. "Searching for Sustainability in Health Systems: Toward a Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Mobile Health Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Alexander Cimprich & Steven B. Young, 2023. "Environmental footprinting of hospitals: Organizational life cycle assessment of a Canadian hospital," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(5), pages 1335-1353, October.
    15. Barbara Greenwood Dufour & Laura Weeks & Gino De Angelis & Dave K. Marchand & David Kaunelis & Melissa Severn & Melissa Walter & Nicole Mittmann, 2022. "How We Might Further Integrate Considerations of Environmental Impact When Assessing the Value of Health Technologies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-8, September.
    16. Qasim Mudher Modhehi & Haider Mohammed Zwain, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment and Environmental Impact Evaluation of Demineralized Water Production at Al-Hilla Second Gas Power Plant, Iraq," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Erik Roos Lindgreen & Katelin Opferkuch & Anna M. Walker & Roberta Salomone & Tatiana Reyes & Andrea Raggi & Alberto Simboli & Walter J. V. Vermeulen & Sandra Caeiro, 2022. "Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1414-1438, May.
    18. Danial Esfandiary Abdolmaleki & Shoeib Faraji Abdolmaleki & Pastora M. Bello Bugallo, 2023. "Evaluating Renewable Energy and Ranking 17 Autonomous Communities in Spain: A TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-12, August.
    19. Wang, Yongli & Yang, Jiale & Zhou, Minhan & Zhang, Danyang & Song, Fuhao & Dong, Fugui & Zhu, Jinrong & Liu, Lin, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of China's power generation industry based on a matter-element extension model," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Hensher, Martin & Canny, Ben & Zimitat, Craig & Campbell, Julie & Palmer, Andrew, 2020. "Health care, overconsumption and uneconomic growth: A conceptual framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5363-:d:1100293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.