IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4990-d1094147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the Operational Benefits of Dry Port Integrated Cooperation in Port Clusters: A Microsimulation Study

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet Sinan Yıldırım

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa 45140, Turkey)

Abstract

As marine cargo traffic continues to grow, ports are experiencing increasing problems with congestion. To address this issue without requiring significant capital investment, neighboring ports can share their capacity to meet the rising demand for cargo throughput. While there are many planning level studies on inter-port cooperation, there is a scarcity of operational-level studies, and there is currently no available dry port integrated cooperation scheme for port clusters that utilizes a microsimulation approach. This study aims to contribute to the existing literature by proposing a conceptual port integration scheme that includes a dry port for improved coordination between ports in clusters. The discrete event simulation (DES) approach was used to construct three representative microsimulation models with dry port integration considering vessel transfer policies and no-cooperation scenario. The outputs of the models were evaluated using performance metrics (vessel delays, storage capacities, and the number of serviced vessels) using t -test statistics. The results show that the cooperation scheme with the vessel transfer policy and the strategic management of vessel transfer can significantly reduce the vessel operation delay by over 39% for the no-cooperation scenario with an integrated dry port and this value is further improved to 62% if a simulation-based port selection module (PSM) is used for vessel transfer policy. Additionally, the mean number of containers of the average of two port storages decreased by 40% and further decreased by 69% with the PSM. In terms of decision-making performance for vessel transfer decisions with varying quay lengths, PSM was determined to be superior to the vessel transfer policy considering the number of vessels in port queues. The proposed conceptual port integration model and approach can assist decision-makers in evaluating the effectiveness of different cooperation schemes and vessel transfer policies for adjacent ports in port clusters.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Sinan Yıldırım, 2023. "Quantifying the Operational Benefits of Dry Port Integrated Cooperation in Port Clusters: A Microsimulation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4990-:d:1094147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4990/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4990/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kavirathna, Chathumi Ayanthi & Kawasaki, Tomoya & Hanaoka, Shinya, 2019. "Intra-port coopetition under different combinations of terminal ownership," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 132-148.
    2. Kavirathna, Chathumi Ayanthi & Kawasaki, Tomoya & Hanaoka, Shinya & Bandara, Yapa Mahinda, 2020. "Cooperation with a vessel transfer policy for coopetition among container terminals in a single port," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Chengsong Wang & Qian Yang & Shanhua Wu, 2022. "Coordinated Development Relationship between Port Cluster and Its Hinterland Economic System Based on Improved Coupling Coordination Degree Model: Empirical Study from China’s Port Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan & Lumsden, Kenth, 2009. "The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 338-345.
    5. Yang, Zhongzhen & Guo, Liquan & Lian, Feng, 2019. "Port integration in a region with multiport gateways in the context of industrial transformation and upgrading of the port," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 231-246.
    6. Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso, 2020. "Dry ports: research outcomes, trends, and future implications," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(2), pages 265-292, June.
    7. Wan, Shulin & Luan, Weixin & Chen, Yuying & Lin, Qiaoqiao, 2022. "Influence of dry ports construction on seaport growth: Case of Ningbo Zhoushan Port," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 40-47.
    8. Chang, Zheng & Yang, Dong & Wan, Yulai & Han, Tingting, 2019. "Analysis on the features of Chinese dry ports: Ownership, customs service, rail service and regional competition," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 107-116.
    9. Adriano M. P. Santos & Regina Salvador & João C. Quaresma Dias & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2018. "Assessment of port economic impacts on regional economy with a case study on the Port of Lisbon," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 684-698, July.
    10. Neven Grubisic & Tomislav Krljan & Livia Maglić & Siniša Vilke, 2020. "The Microsimulation Model for Assessing the Impact of Inbound Traffic Flows for Container Terminals Located near City Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Dong, Gang & Zheng, Shiyuan & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2018. "The effects of regional port integration: The case of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 1-15.
    12. Guo, Liquan & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Jiang, Changmin & Long, Jiancheng, 2021. "Stepwise capacity integration in port cluster under uncertainty and congestion," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 94-113.
    13. Xiao Ruan & Xuehao Feng & Kelvin Pang, 2018. "Development of port service network in OBOR via capacity sharing: an idea from Zhejiang province in China," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 105-124, January.
    14. Brian Slack & Claude Comtois & Robert McCalla, 2002. "Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry: a global perspective," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 65-76, January.
    15. Peter V. Hall & Wouter Jacobs, 2012. "Why are maritime ports (still) urban, and why should policy-makers care?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 189-206, March.
    16. Nan Liu & Zixiang Gong & Xiao Xiao, 2018. "Disaster prevention and strategic investment for multiple ports in a region: cooperation or not," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 585-603, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Yutao & Li, Zhenfu & Duan, Wei & Deng, Zhao, 2023. "The impact of provincial port integration on port efficiency: Empirical evidence from China's Coastal Provinces," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Wan, Shulin & Luan, Weixin & Chen, Yuying & Lin, Qiaoqiao, 2022. "Influence of dry ports construction on seaport growth: Case of Ningbo Zhoushan Port," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 40-47.
    3. Bi Wang & Kwai Sang Chin & Qin Su, 2022. "Risk management and market structures in seaport–dry port systems," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(1), pages 114-137, March.
    4. Wan, Shulin & Luan, Weixin, 2022. "Hinterland evolution and port growth decomposition: The case of Shanghai," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. Liu, Weichen & Cao, Youhui & Chen, Jianglong & Guo, Jiaying & Liang, Shuangbo, 2023. "Organization of river-sea container transportation in the Yangtze River: Processes and mechanisms," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Jiang, Xiaodan & Fan, Houming & Luo, Meifeng & Xu, Zhenlin, 2020. "Strategic port competition in multimodal network development considering shippers’ choice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 68-89.
    7. Zheng, Shiyuan & Luo, Meifeng, 2021. "Competition or cooperation? Ports’ strategies and welfare analysis facing shipping alliances," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2020. "Dry Port Terminal Location Selection by Applying the Hybrid Grey MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Bouchery, Yann & Woxenius, Johan & Fransoo, Jan C., 2020. "Identifying the market areas of port-centric logistics and hinterland intermodal transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 599-611.
    10. Feng, Hongxiang & Grifoll, Manel & Yang, Zhongzhen & Zheng, Pengjun & Martin-Mallofre, Agustí, 2020. "Visualization of container throughput evolution of the Yangtze River Delta multi-port system: the ternary diagram method," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    11. Snežana Tadić & Milovan Kovač & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2021. "The Selection of Intermodal Transport System Scenarios in the Function of Southeastern Europe Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    12. Luo, Meifeng & Chen, Fuying & Zhang, Jiantong, 2022. "Relationships among port competition, cooperation and competitiveness: A literature review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-9.
    13. Yang, Dong & Notteboom, Theo & Zhou, Xin, 2021. "Spatial, temporal and institutional characteristics of entry strategies in inland container terminals: A comparison between Yangtze River and Rhine River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Zheng, Shiyuan & Wang, Kun & Fu, Xiaowen & Zhang, Anming & Ge, Ying-En, 2022. "The effects of information publicity and government subsidy on port climate change adaptation: Strategy and social welfare analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 284-312.
    15. Weidong Li & Olli-Pekka Hilmola & Yulia Panova, 2019. "Container Sea Ports and Dry Ports: Future CO 2 Emission Reduction Potential in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Justin Berli & Mattia Bunel & César Ducruet, 2018. "Sea-Land Interdependence in the Global Maritime Network: the Case of Australian Port Cities," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 447-471, September.
    17. Mohammed Mojahid Hossain Chowdhury & Ziaul Haque Munim, 2023. "Dry port location selection using a fuzzy AHP-BWM-PROMETHEE approach," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(2), pages 301-329, June.
    18. Justin Berli & Mattia Bunel & César Ducruet, 2018. "Sea-Land Interdependence in the Global Maritime Network: the Case of Australian Port Cities," Post-Print hal-01806692, HAL.
    19. Tagawa, Hoshi & Kawasaki, Tomoya & Hanaoka, Shinya, 2022. "Evaluation of international maritime network configuration and impact of port cooperation on port hierarchy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 14-24.
    20. Guo, Liquan & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Jiang, Changmin & Long, Jiancheng, 2021. "Stepwise capacity integration in port cluster under uncertainty and congestion," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 94-113.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4990-:d:1094147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.