IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3737-d1072255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Analysis of the Carbon Accounting Information Disclosure (CAID) Affecting R&D Investment and Sustainable Development in State-Owned and Non-State-Owned Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Michael So

    (Faculty of Business and Management, BNU-HKBU United International College, No. 2000, Jintong Road, Tangjiawan, Zhuhai 519087, China)

Abstract

As a topic of interest, the quality of Carbon Accounting Information Disclosure (CAID) provides necessary support to enhance sustainability and investment in Research and Development (R&D). Does improving the quality of CAID have an impact on the R&D investment? Does the sustainability of enterprises play a moderating role in the quality of CAID and R&D investment? These are questions that deserve attention and discussion. This paper extracted 1407 samples from China’s markets from 2019–2021, carried out descriptive statistical analysis, analyzed the impact of CAID on R&D investment using multiple linear regression, verified the moderating effect of sustainability on the role of both, and finally conducted a robustness test. The study showed that the higher the quality of CAID, the greater the R&D investment of listed companies; the stronger the sustainability, the stronger the promotion of CAID quality on R&D investment. The findings were also applicable in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), while the effect is not significant in non-State-Owned Enterprises. This paper made several recommendations. First, to enhance the company’s R&D investment, listed companies should enhance their CAID capability. Second, listed companies should improve their sustainability to ensure the effective performance of CAID. Third, the government should strengthen supervision and policy guidance to promote the continuous improvement of the CAID system to guide listed companies on the road to developing a low-carbon economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael So, 2023. "Empirical Analysis of the Carbon Accounting Information Disclosure (CAID) Affecting R&D Investment and Sustainable Development in State-Owned and Non-State-Owned Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3737-:d:1072255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3737/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3737/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morgane Le Breton & Franck Aggeri, 2020. "The emergence of carbon accounting: how instruments and dispositifs interact in new practice creation," Post-Print hal-01864695, HAL.
    2. Bowen Lu & Shangzhi Yue, 2022. "A Study on the Mechanism of Environmental Information Disclosure Oriented to the Construction of Ecological Civilization in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Huimin Li & Harley E. Ryan, 2022. "Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the evolution of family ownership and firm policies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(7-8), pages 1391-1424, July.
    4. Rong He & Le Luo & Abul Shamsuddin & Qingliang Tang, 2022. "Corporate carbon accounting: a literature review of carbon accounting research from the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 261-298, March.
    5. Yasean A. Tahat & Ghassan H. Mardini, 2021. "Corporate carbon disclosure, carbon performance and corporate firm performance," International Journal of Sustainable Economy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 219-235.
    6. Zahra Borghei, 2021. "Carbon disclosure: a systematic literature review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5255-5280, December.
    7. Quan Dong & Juan Carlos Bárcena-Ruiz, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and disclosure of R&D knowledge," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 585-602, August.
    8. Gao, Yuning & Zhang, Meichen & Zheng, Jinghai, 2021. "Accounting and determinants analysis of China's provincial total factor productivity considering carbon emissions," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Ermanno C. Tortia & Mónica Gago & Florence Degavre & Simone Poledrini, 2022. "Worker Involvement and Performance in Italian Social Enterprises: The Role of Motivations, Gender and Workload," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Sue Ogilvy & Danny O'Brien & Rachel Lawrence & Mark Gardner, 2022. "A natural capital accounting framework to communicate the environmental credentials of individual wool-producing businesses," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 765-802, May.
    11. Erlin Trisyulianti & Budhi Prihartono & Made Andriani & Kadarsah Suryadi, 2022. "Sustainability Performance Management Framework for Circular Economy Implementation in State-Owned Plantation Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nurshahirah Abd Majid & Amar Hisham Jaaffar, 2023. "The Effect of Women’s Leadership on Carbon Disclosure by the Top 100 Global Energy Leaders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Kiswanto Kiswanto & Ain Hajawiyah & Atta Putra Harjanto & Endah Tri Setyarini, 2023. "Twelve Years Research Journey of Carbon Accounting," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 246-254, July.
    3. Nurshahirah Abd Majid & Amar Hisham Jaaffar & Raed Hussam Mansour Alzoubi, 2023. "The Impact of Women’s Role in Corporate Governance on Carbon Disclosure Performance: A Descriptive Study of Top 100 Global Energy Leaders," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 404-417, November.
    4. Le Luo & Qingliang Tang & Hanlu Fan & Jamie Ayers, 2023. "Corporate carbon assurance and the quality of carbon disclosure," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 657-690, March.
    5. Shan Zhou, 2022. "Reporting and Assurance of Climate‐Related and Other Sustainability Information: A Review of Research and Practice," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 315-333, September.
    6. Poledrini Simone & Montrone Alessandro & Searing Elizabeth A. M., 2022. "A Model for Directing and Modulating Public Interventions in Social Enterprises," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 307-332, October.
    7. Le Sun & Congmou Zhu & Shaofeng Yuan & Lixia Yang & Shan He & Wuyan Li, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Agricultural Carbon Emission Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Riza Radmehr & Samira Shayanmehr & Ernest Baba Ali & Elvis Kwame Ofori & Elżbieta Jasińska & Michał Jasiński, 2022. "Exploring the Nexus of Renewable Energy, Ecological Footprint, and Economic Growth through Globalization and Human Capital in G7 Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Hongni Zhang & Xiangyi Xu, 2023. "Innovative Technology Method Based on Evolutionary Game Model of Enterprise Sustainable Development and CNN–GRU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Zebin Zheng & Wenjun Xiao & Ziye Cheng, 2023. "China’s Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency Assessment Based on Coordinated Reduction in Pollution and Carbon Emission: From the 11th to the 13th Five-Year Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Eryu Zhang & Xiaoyu He & Peng Xiao, 2022. "Does Smart City Construction Decrease Urban Carbon Emission Intensity? Evidence from a Difference-in-Difference Estimation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Zhuohui Yu & Shiping Mao & Qingning Lin, 2022. "Has China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot Policy Improved Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Hongfeng Zhang & Lu Huang & Yan Zhu & Hongyun Si & Xu He, 2021. "Does Low-Carbon City Construction Improve Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Bárcena-Ruiz, Juan Carlos & Garzón, María Begoña & Sagasta, Amagoia, 2023. "Environmental corporate social responsibility, R&D and disclosure of “green” innovation knowledge," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Wu, Qingyang & Wang, Yanying, 2022. "How does carbon emission price stimulate enterprises' total factor productivity? Insights from China's emission trading scheme pilots," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    16. Delphine Gibassier & Giovanna Michelon & Mélodie Cartel, 2020. "The future of carbon accounting research: “we’ve pissed mother nature off, big time”," Post-Print hal-02810507, HAL.
    17. Habib Zaman Khan & Muhammad Nurul Houqe & Ielemia K Ielemia, 2023. "Organic versus cosmetic efforts of the quality of carbon reporting by top New Zealand firms. Does market reward or penalise?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 686-703, January.
    18. Lee, Chi-Chuan & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2022. "How does green finance affect green total factor productivity? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    19. Mary S. Hill & Gary K. Taylor, 2023. "Default risk and earnings expectations: The role of contract maturity in the credit default swap market," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4275-4298, December.
    20. Dongdong Lu & Zilong Wang, 2023. "Towards green economic recovery: how to improve green total factor productivity," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3163-3185, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3737-:d:1072255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.