IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3165-d1063010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shaping Frugal Innovation Processes, and Ensuring Security and Sustainable Development of Enterprises in the Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Jacek Woźniak

    (Institute of Organization and Management, Military University of Technology in Warsaw, 00-908 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Wioletta Sylwia Wereda

    (Institute of Organization and Management, Military University of Technology in Warsaw, 00-908 Warszawa, Poland)

Abstract

This article discusses the importance of 28 different activities—aimed at shaping innovative processes, e.g., connected with costs and efficiency, employment, production waste, cooperation with external entities, innovation policy and regulations, social acceptance, as well as value management—in ensuring the security and sustainable development of enterprises in the environment. The objective of the study is to estimate the level of the importance of specific factors/activities related to shaping the frugal innovation processes in ensuring the security and sustainable development of enterprises, as well as the identification of the main groups of these factors/activities, and the comparison of enterprises in terms of the importance of these factors/activities in ensuring security and sustainable development. The study used both an inductive and a deductive approach. It used the cluster analysis ( k -mean method), the analysis of descriptive statistics, and the following statistical tests: Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for one sample, Kruskal–Wallis test for independent samples, and U Mann–Whitney test for independent samples. In the study, four basic components were identified, which were used for subsequent quantitative verification of six research hypotheses. The study included 200 large enterprises from the most innovative sectors in Poland. The study showed that factors/activities related to the implementation of frugal innovation processes are of moderately high importance in ensuring the security and sustainable development of enterprises in the environment, as well as innovative enterprises that are dominated by entities characterized by the high importance of all factors/activities related to the implementation of frugal innovation processes in ensuring their safety and sustainable development in the environment. Furthermore, there are no statistically significant differences between enterprises in the importance of factors/activities related to the implementation of frugal innovation processes in ensuring the security and sustainability of these enterprises in the environment in the case of entities with different: lengths of service (i.e., the age of the enterprise), scale of operation, average annual turnovers, as well as profile of operation (i.e., the sector).

Suggested Citation

  • Jacek Woźniak & Wioletta Sylwia Wereda, 2023. "Shaping Frugal Innovation Processes, and Ensuring Security and Sustainable Development of Enterprises in the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3165-:d:1063010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3165/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3165/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wioletta Wereda, 2022. "The Role of Modern Technologies in Functioning of Contemporary Innovative Enterprises on the Example of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 418-429.
    2. Mario Pansera & Soumodip Sarkar, 2016. "Crafting Sustainable Development Solutions: Frugal Innovations of Grassroots Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Hossain, Mokter & Levänen, Jarkko & Wierenga, Marleen, 2021. "Pursuing Frugal Innovation for Sustainability at the Grassroots Level," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 374-381, May.
    4. Anne Hyvärinen & Marko Keskinen & Olli Varis, 2016. "Potential and Pitfalls of Frugal Innovation in the Water Sector: Insights from Tanzania to Global Value Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Akmal Durmanov & Viera Bartosova & Svetlana Drobyazko & Oksana Melnyk & Volodymyr Fillipov, 2019. "Mechanism to ensure sustainable development of enterprises in the information space," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1377-1386, December.
    6. Balkrishna Rao, 2014. "Alleviating Poverty in the Twenty-First Century Through Frugal Innovations," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(3), pages 40-59.
    7. Hossain, Mokter, 2021. "Frugal innovation and sustainable business models," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Kateryna Andriushchenko & Andrii Buriachenko & Olexandr Rozhko & Oksana Lavruk & Pavel Skok & Yaroslava Hlushchenko & Yelyzaveta Muzychka & Nataliia Slavina & Olena Buchynska & Viktoriia Kondarevych, 2020. "Peculiarities of sustainable development of enterprises in the context of digital transformation," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 2255-2270, March.
    9. Tiwari, Rajnish & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2012. "India - a lead market for frugal innovations? Extending the lead market theory to emerging economies," Working Papers 67, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarkar, Soumodip & Mateus, Sara, 2022. "Value creation using minimal resources – A meta-synthesis of frugal innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Achtelik, Timo & Herstatt, Cornelius & Tiwari, Rajnish, 2022. "Frugal sustainability: A new perspective to foster corporate sustainability," Working Papers 112, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management, revised 2022.
    3. Bhattacharjya, Bibhuti Ranjan & Bhaduri, Saradindu & Kakoty, Sashindra Kumar, 2023. "Co-creating community-led frugal innovation: An adapted Quadruple Helix?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    4. Hossain, Mokter & Park, Sukyung & Shahid, Subhan, 2023. "Frugal innovation for sustainable rural development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Stephanie D. Maier & Tabea Beck & Javier Francisco Vallejo & Rafael Horn & Jan-Hendrik Söhlemann & Trung Thanh Nguyen, 2016. "Methodological Approach for the Sustainability Assessment of Development Cooperation Projects for Built Innovations Based on the SDGs and Life Cycle Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Octaviano Rojas Luiz & Enzo Barberio Mariano & Hermes Moretti Ribeiro da Silva, 2021. "Pro-Poor Innovations to Promote Instrumental Freedoms: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Zhenfeng Liu & Jian Feng & Jinfeng Wang, 2020. "Resource-Constrained Innovation Method for Sustainability: Application of Morphological Analysis and TRIZ Inventive Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Rakhshanda Khan, 2016. "How Frugal Innovation Promotes Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-29, October.
    9. Balkrishna C. Rao & Ingo Liefner, 2023. "Frugal Engineering of Advanced Frugal Innovations for Global Sustainability Entrepreneurship," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 32(2_suppl), pages 69-88, November.
    10. Du, Juntao & Shen, Zhiyang & Song, Malin & Zhang, Linda, 2023. "Nexus between digital transformation and energy technology innovation: An empirical test of A-share listed enterprises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Kouam, Jean & Asongu, Simplice, 2022. "Effects of Taxation on Social Innovation and Implications for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Developing Countries: A Literature Review," MPRA Paper 114061, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Maria Federica Cordova & Andrea Celone, 2019. "SDGs and Innovation in the Business Context Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Mónica Ramos-Mejía & Alejandro Balanzo, 2018. "What It Takes to Lead Sustainability Transitions from the Bottom-Up: Strategic Interactions of Grassroots Ecopreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Anja Hansen & Jörn Budde & Yusuf Nadi Karatay & Annette Prochnow, 2016. "CUDe —Carbon Utilization Degree as an Indicator for Sustainable Biomass Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Bipashyee Ghosh & Saurabh Arora, 2022. "Smart as (un)democratic? The making of a smart city imaginary in Kolkata, India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 318-339, February.
    16. Eleonora Santos & Rui Alexandre Castanho, 2022. "The Impact of Size on the Performance of Transnational Corporations Operating in the Textile Industry in Portugal during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Zviemurwi J. Chihambakwe & Sara S. (Saartjie) Grobbelaar & Stephen Matope, 2021. "Creating Shared Value in BoP Communities with Micro-Manufacturing Factories: A Systematized Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    18. Tiwari, Rajnish & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2012. "Open global innovation networks as enablers of frugal innovation: propositions based on evidence from India," Working Papers 72, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    19. Shaphali Gupta, 2020. "Understanding the feasibility and value of grassroots innovation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 941-965, September.
    20. Patnaik, Jayshree & Bhowmick, Bhaskar, 2019. "Revisiting appropriate technology with changing socio-technical landscape in emerging countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 8-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3165-:d:1063010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.