IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p2892-d1058980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Artificial Intelligence Approach for Investigating and Predicting Yield Stress of Cemented Paste Backfill

Author

Listed:
  • Van Quan Tran

    (Science Technology and International Cooperation Department, University of Transport Technology, No. 54 Trieu Khuc Street, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

Abstract

The technology known as cemented paste backfill (CPB) has gained considerable popularity worldwide. Yield stress (YS) is a significant factor considered in the assessment of CPB’s flowability or transportability. The minimal shear stress necessary to start the flow is known as Yield stress (YS), and it serves as an excellent measure of the strength of the particle-particle interaction. The traditional evaluation and measurement of YS performed by experimental tests are time-consuming and costly, which induces delays in construction projects. Moreover, the YS of CPB depends on numerous factors such as cement/tailing ratio, solid content and oxide content of tailing. Therefore, in order to simplify YS estimation and evaluation, the Artificial Intelligence (AI) approaches including eight Machine Learning techniques such as the Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm, Gradient Boosting algorithm, Random Forest algorithm, Decision Trees, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines and Gaussian Process are used to build the soft-computing model in predicting the YS of CPB. The performance of these models is evaluated by three metrics coefficient of determination (R 2 ), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The 3 best models were found to predict the Yield Stress of CPB (Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and Random Forest (RF), respectively) with the 3 metrics of the three models, respectively, GB {R 2 = 0.9811, RMSE = 0.1327 MPa, MAE = 0.0896 MPa}, XGB {R 2 = 0.9034, RMSE = 0.3004 MPa, MAE = 0.1696 MPa} and RF {R 2 = 0.8534, RMSE = 0.3700 MPa, MAE = 0.1786 MPa}, for the testing dataset. Based on the best performance model including GB, XG and RF, the other AI techniques such as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Permutation Importance, and Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE) are also used for evaluating the factor effect on the YS of CPB. The results of this investigation can help the engineers to accelerate the mixed design of CPB.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Quan Tran, 2023. "Using Artificial Intelligence Approach for Investigating and Predicting Yield Stress of Cemented Paste Backfill," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:2892-:d:1058980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/2892/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/2892/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quang Hung Nguyen & Hai-Bang Ly & Lanh Si Ho & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Hiep Van Le & Van Quan Tran & Indra Prakash & Binh Thai Pham, 2021. "Influence of Data Splitting on Performance of Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Shear Strength of Soil," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-15, February.
    2. Aya Hasan AlKhereibi & Tadesse G. Wakjira & Murat Kucukvar & Nuri C. Onat, 2023. "Predictive Machine Learning Algorithms for Metro Ridership Based on Urban Land Use Policies in Support of Transit-Oriented Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Jongkyum & Lim, Jee-Hae & Yoon, Kyunghee, 2022. "How do the content, format, and tone of Twitter-based corporate disclosure vary depending on earnings performance?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    2. Xiangning Dong & Xuhao Zhu & Minghua Hu & Jie Bao, 2023. "A Methodology for Predicting Ground Delay Program Incidence through Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Matthew Oyeleye & Tianhua Chen & Sofya Titarenko & Grigoris Antoniou, 2022. "A Predictive Analysis of Heart Rates Using Machine Learning Techniques," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Caropul Mendes & Hugo Raposo & Ricardo Ferraz & José Torres Farinha, 2023. "The Economic Management of Physical Assets: The Practical Case of an Urban Passenger Transport Company in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Mohamed Zul Fadhli Khairuddin & Puat Lu Hui & Khairunnisa Hasikin & Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak & Khin Wee Lai & Ahmad Shakir Mohd Saudi & Siti Salwa Ibrahim, 2022. "Occupational Injury Risk Mitigation: Machine Learning Approach and Feature Optimization for Smart Workplace Surveillance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Celal Cakiroglu & Gebrail Bekdaş & Sanghun Kim & Zong Woo Geem, 2022. "Explainable Ensemble Learning Models for the Rheological Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Nicola Berloco & Stefano Coropulis & Giuseppe Garofalo & Paolo Intini & Vittorio Ranieri, 2023. "Analysis of the Factors Influencing Speed Cushion Effectiveness in the Urban Context: A Case Study Experiment in the City of Bari, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Madhusmita Das & Rasmita Dash & Sambit Kumar Mishra, 2023. "Automatic Detection of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma from Histopathological Images of Oral Mucosa Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Yaren Aydın & Ümit Işıkdağ & Gebrail Bekdaş & Sinan Melih Nigdeli & Zong Woo Geem, 2023. "Use of Machine Learning Techniques in Soil Classification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:2892-:d:1058980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.