IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p938-d1025163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Parking Lot Selection Approach Based on the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods: Health Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Aroua Amari

    (Engineering, Innovation and Emerging Technologies (2IET), Engineering Research Laboratory (LRI), National and Higher School of Electricity and Mechanics (ENSEM), Hassan II University, Casablanca 8118, Morocco)

  • Laila Moussaid

    (Engineering, Innovation and Emerging Technologies (2IET), Engineering Research Laboratory (LRI), National and Higher School of Electricity and Mechanics (ENSEM), Hassan II University, Casablanca 8118, Morocco)

  • Saadia Tallal

    (Engineering, Innovation and Emerging Technologies (2IET), Engineering Research Laboratory (LRI), National and Higher School of Electricity and Mechanics (ENSEM), Hassan II University, Casablanca 8118, Morocco)

Abstract

To find a parking space, valet parking drivers have to travel a lot, which leads to carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. In order to reduce these emissions, it is essential to understand a user’s needs and criteria when searching for a parking space. Several selection criteria are considered when allocating a parking space. Recent research on parking space management mentions several parameters that have an impact on the choice of a parking space: namely, the traffic situation, the availability of each parking lot in question, and the cost of parking, etc. In this article, we discuss a new criterion: the physical condition of the driver in the management of parking spaces; the identification of the driver’s bodily fragility. We also propose MCDM as a parking space allocation model that best meets the cost–benefit convention. This reflection leads us to evaluate MCDM methods in the field of intelligent parking management. Therefore, we conducted a comparison between the most recent multi-criteria decision making methods used by researchers, namely, CODA, EDAS, TOPSIS, and WASPAS. The CRITIC method was used in this paper to objectively determine the weight of each criterion. A new approach is proposed to evaluate and select the best MCDM method. Indeed, we propose a method that computes the “average inter-item correlation SW”, a combination of the “average inter-item correlation” and the SW coefficient. This approach allows us to efficiently compute the correlation between a method and the set of methods while favoring the cells with the best ranking. A case study is presented to illustrate the MCDM approach to parking space allocation and evaluation. The proposed system provides drivers with services such as intelligent parking decisions, taking into account the human aspect while reducing energy consumption, driving time, and traffic congestion caused by searching for available parking spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Aroua Amari & Laila Moussaid & Saadia Tallal, 2023. "New Parking Lot Selection Approach Based on the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods: Health Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:938-:d:1025163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/938/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/938/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alireza Alinezhad & Javad Khalili, 2019. "New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM)," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-3-030-15009-9, September.
    2. Demir, Selcuk & Basaraner, Melih & Taskin Gumus, Alev, 2021. "Selection of suitable parking lot sites in megacities: A case study for four districts of Istanbul," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hossein Yousefi & Mohammad Hasan Ghodusinejad & Armin Ghodrati, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Future Energy System Planning and Analysis for Hot Arid Areas of Iran," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Hossein Yousefi & Saheb Ghanbari Motlagh & Mohammad Montazeri, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making System for Wind Farm Site-Selection Using Geographic Information System (GIS): Case Study of Semnan Province, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Dana Hübelová & Martina Kuncová & Hana Vojáčková & Jitka Coufalová & Alice Kozumplíková & Francois Stefanus Lategan & Beatrice-Elena Chromková Manea, 2021. "Inequalities in Health: Methodological Approaches to Spatial Differentiation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Mohammed Ifkirne & Houssam El Bouhi & Siham Acharki & Quoc Bao Pham & Abdelouahed Farah & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh, 2022. "Multi-Criteria GIS-Based Analysis for Mapping Suitable Sites for Onshore Wind Farms in Southeast France," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Martina Kuncova & Jana Seknickova, 2022. "Two-stage weighted PROMETHEE II with results’ visualization," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(2), pages 547-571, June.
    6. Stefan Jovčić & Petr Průša, 2021. "A Hybrid MCDM Approach in Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Provider Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Nora Sharkasi & Nguyen Vo Hien Chau & Jay Rajasekera, 2023. "Export Potential Analysis of Vietnamese Bottled Coconut Water by Incorporating Criteria Weights of MCDM into the Gravity of Trade Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-26, July.
    8. Jiawei Qi & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Yanan Chen & Chenyang Wu & Chenyu Duan & Zhongshuai Cheng & Zengkai Pan, 2022. "Research on the Evaluation of Geological Environment Carrying Capacity Based on the AHP-CRITIC Empowerment Method," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Marco Locurcio & Francesco Tajani & Pierluigi Morano & Debora Anelli & Benedetto Manganelli, 2021. "Credit Risk Management of Property Investments through Multi-Criteria Indicators," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Ghodusinejad, Mohammad Hasan & Lavasani, Zahra & Yousefi, Hossein, 2023. "A combined decision-making framework for techno-enviro-economic assessment of a commercial CCHP system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    11. Ahmed, Umair & Carpitella, Silvia & Certa, Antonella, 2021. "An integrated methodological approach for optimising complex systems subjected to predictive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Ning Lu & Yefei Li & Bochu Xu, 2022. "Evaluation of the Suitability of Smart Health Products for Aging Based on the IIVAHP-CRITIC Model: A Case Study of Smart Health Kiosk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Halil Kete & Fatih Karasaç, 2022. "Evaluation of the Economic Performances of the European Union Countries and Turkey in the Covid-19 Process with the COPRAS Method," Journal of Economic Policy Researches, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 373-395, July.
    14. Tabasam Rashid & Asif Ali & Yu-Ming Chu, 2021. "Hybrid BW-EDAS MCDM methodology for optimal industrial robot selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Getasew Taddese & Severine Durieux & Emmanuel Duc, 2021. "Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Faceshield Bracket Manufacturing by Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Miebs, Grzegorz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2022. "Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 633-651.
    17. Marco Cinelli & Matteo Spada & Wansub Kim & Yiwen Zhang & Peter Burgherr, 2021. "MCDA Index Tool: an interactive software to develop indices and rankings," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 82-109, March.
    18. Tanase Tasente & Mari-Isabella Stan, 2023. "Collaborative Parking Management in Constanta: The Role of Public Policies and Citizen Participation," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 43(1), pages 37-54, May.
    19. Madjid Tavana & Akram Shaabani & Francisco Javier Santos-Arteaga & Iman Raeesi Vanani, 2020. "A Review of Uncertain Decision-Making Methods in Energy Management Using Text Mining and Data Analytics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, August.
    20. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Virgilijus Skulskis, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Sustainable Selection of Insulation Materials in Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:938-:d:1025163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.