IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16876-d1300896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risky Business? Evaluating Hydrogen Partnerships Established by Germany, The Netherlands, and Belgium

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Dejonghe

    (Ghent Institute for International and European Studies, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

Following the introduction of the EU’s Hydrogen Strategy in 2020 as part of the European Green Deal, some EU member states have deployed a very active hydrogen diplomacy. Germany, The Netherlands, and Belgium have been the most active ones, establishing no less than 40 bilateral hydrogen trade partnerships with 30 potential export countries in the last three years. However, concerns have been voiced about whether such hydrogen trade relationships can be economically feasible, geopolitically wise, environmentally sustainable, and socially just. This article therefore evaluates these partnerships considering three risk dimensions: economic, political, and sustainability (covering both environmental and justice) risks. The analysis reveals that the selection of partner countries entails significant trade-offs. Four groups of partner countries can be identified based on their respective risk profile: “Last Resorts”, “Volatile Ventures”, “Strategic Gambits”, and “Trusted Friends”. Strikingly, less than one-third of the agreements are concluded with countries that fall within the “Trusted Friends” category, which have the lowest overall risk profile. These findings show the need for policy makers to think much more strategically about which partnerships to pursue and to confront tough choices about which risks and trade-offs they are willing to accept.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Dejonghe, 2023. "Risky Business? Evaluating Hydrogen Partnerships Established by Germany, The Netherlands, and Belgium," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16876-:d:1300896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16876/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16876/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stavros Afionis & Lindsay C. Stringer & Nicola Favretto & Julia Tomei & Marcos S. Buckeridge, 2016. "Unpacking Brazil’s Leadership in the Global Biofuels Arena: Brazilian Ethanol Diplomacy in Africa," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(3), pages 127-150, August.
    2. Ana Bovan & Tamara Vucenovic & Nenad Peric, 2020. "Negotiating Energy Diplomacy and its Relationship with Foreign Policy and National Security," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 1-6.
    3. Ikonnikova, Svetlana A. & Scanlon, Bridget R. & Berdysheva, Sofia A., 2023. "A global energy system perspective on hydrogen Trade: A framework for the market color and the size analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph Loschan & Daniel Schwabeneder & Matthias Maldet & Georg Lettner & Hans Auer, 2023. "Hydrogen as Short-Term Flexibility and Seasonal Storage in a Sector-Coupled Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-35, July.
    2. Henri Bezuidenhout & Gabriel Mhonyera & Jacob Van Rensburg & Hsia Hua Sheng & José Marcos Carrera & Xinjian Cui, 2021. "Emerging Market Global Players: The Case of Brazil, China and South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Di Lu & Yonggang Peng & Jing Sun, 2024. "Dual-Stage Optimization Scheduling Model for a Grid-Connected Renewable Energy System with Hybrid Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Olga V. Panina & Anna A. Bakulina & Lyubov A. Ploticyna & Natalia L. Krasyukova, 2020. "BRICS on the African Energy Market: Current Situation and Prospects for Mutual Cooperation," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 93-101.
    5. Tamara Llano & Natalia Quijorna & Alberto Coz, 2017. "Detoxification of a Lignocellulosic Waste from a Pulp Mill to Enhance Its Fermentation Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16876-:d:1300896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.