IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14348-d1250235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing the Pedestrian Injury Severity of Micromobility Crashes

Author

Listed:
  • Almudena Sanjurjo-de-No

    (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Ramiro de Maeztu 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Ana María Pérez-Zuriaga

    (Highway Engineering Research Group (HERG), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Alfredo García

    (Highway Engineering Research Group (HERG), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

The growth of micromobility transport in cities has created a new mobility paradigm, but this has also resulted in increased traffic conflicts and collisions. This research focuses on understanding the impacts of micromobility vehicles on pedestrian injury severity in urban areas of Spain between 2016 and 2021. The Random Forest classification model was used to identify the most significant factors and their combinations affecting pedestrian injury severity. To address the issue of unbalanced data, the synthetic minority oversampling technique was employed. The findings indicate that pedestrians’ age, specifically those 70 years or older, is the most important variable in determining injury severity. Additionally, collisions at junctions or on weekends are associated with worse outcomes for pedestrians. The results highlight the combined influence of multiple factors, including offenses and distractions by micromobility users and pedestrians. These factors are more prevalent among younger micromobility users and those riding for leisure or on weekends. To enhance micromobility road safety and reduce pedestrian injuries, separating micromobility traffic from pedestrian areas is recommended, restricting micromobility vehicle use on sidewalks, providing training and information to micromobility users, conducting road safety campaigns, increasing enforcement measures, and incorporating buffer zones in bike lanes near on-street parking.

Suggested Citation

  • Almudena Sanjurjo-de-No & Ana María Pérez-Zuriaga & Alfredo García, 2023. "Factors Influencing the Pedestrian Injury Severity of Micromobility Crashes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14348-:d:1250235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14348/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14348/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa Ruhrort, 2020. "Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, October.
    2. de Palma, André & Vosough, Shaghayegh & Liao, Feixiong, 2022. "An overview of effects of COVID-19 on mobility and lifestyle: 18 months since the outbreak," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 372-397.
    3. Aziemah Azhar & Noratiqah Mohd Ariff & Mohd Aftar Abu Bakar & Azzuhana Roslan, 2022. "Classification of Driver Injury Severity for Accidents Involving Heavy Vehicles with Decision Tree and Random Forest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Teschke, K. & Harris, M.A. & Reynolds, C.C.O. & Winters, M. & Babul, S. & Chipman, M. & Cusimano, M.D. & Brubacher, J.R. & Hunte, G. & Friedman, S.M. & Monro, M. & Shen, H. & Vernich, L. & Cripton, P., 2012. "Route infrastructure and the risk of injuries to bicyclists: A case-crossover study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(12), pages 2336-2343.
    5. Matthias Schonlau & Rosie Yuyan Zou, 2020. "The random forest algorithm for statistical learning," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 20(1), pages 3-29, March.
    6. Ruhrort, Lisa, 2020. "Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(19), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paula Quentin & Jost Buscher & Thomas Eltner, 2023. "Transport Planning beyond Infrastructural Change: An Empirical Analysis of Transport Planning Practices in the Rhine-Main Region in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Cayetano Medina-Molina & María de la Sierra Rey-Tienda & Eva María Suárez-Redondo, 2022. "The Transition of Cities towards Innovations in Mobility: Searching for a Global Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Shiva Pourfalatoun & Jubaer Ahmed & Erika E. Miller, 2023. "Shared Electric Scooter Users and Non-Users: Perceptions on Safety, Adoption and Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Ruhrort, Lisa, 2022. "Can a rapid mobility transition appear both desirable and achievable? Reflections on the role of competing narratives for socio-technical change and suggestions for a research agenda," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-1.
    5. Ruhrort, Lisa & Allert, Viktoria, 2021. "Conceptualizing the Role of Individual Agency in Mobility Transitions: Avenues for the Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12, pages 1-1.
    6. Remme, Devyn & Sareen, Siddharth & Haarstad, Håvard, 2022. "Who benefits from sustainable mobility transitions? Social inclusion, populist resistance and elite capture in Bergen, Norway," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Medina-Molina, Cayetano & Pérez-Macías, Noemí & Fernández-Fernádez, José Luis, 2023. "The use of micromobility in different contexts. An explanation through the multilevel perspective and QCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Huixin Liu & Chen Lu & Xiang Hao & Hui Zhao, 2024. "Optimal performance selection of sustainable mobility service projects based on IFSS ‐ Prospect theory ‐ VIKOR: A case study of electric vehicle sharing program," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, November.
    9. Marc Schabka & Aurelia Kammerhofer & Valerie Batiajew & Maria Juschten, 2022. "Driving Forces and Barriers for the Implementation of Mobility Services in Austria—A Practitioner Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    10. Renata Żochowska & Marianna Jacyna & Marcin Jacek Kłos & Piotr Soczówka, 2021. "A GIS-Based Method of the Assessment of Spatial Integration of Bike-Sharing Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-29, April.
    11. Alberica Domitilla Bozzi & Anne Aguilera, 2021. "Shared E-Scooters: A Review of Uses, Health and Environmental Impacts, and Policy Implications of a New Micro-Mobility Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Becker, Sascha O. & Voth, Hans-Joachim, 2023. "From the Death of God to the Rise of Hitler," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 688, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    13. Ibrahim Dogan & Aydan Dogan & Suleyman Gurbuz & Umit Cirakli, 2025. "Analyzing Covid-19 Pandemic Through Cases and Spillover Effect: Cross Wavelet Transformation of Mobility in the Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 8343-8357, June.
    14. Oluwayemi-Oniya Aderibigbe & Trynos Gumbo, 2022. "Variations in Mode Choice of Residents Prior and during COVID-19: An Empirical Evidence from Johannesburg, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Xiaxuan He & Qifeng Yuan & Yinghong Qin & Junwen Lu & Gang Li, 2024. "Analysis of Surface Urban Heat Island in the Guangzhou-Foshan Metropolitan Area Based on Local Climate Zones," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-34, October.
    16. Abouelela, Mohamed & Durán-Rodas, David & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2024. "Do we all need shared E-scooters? An accessibility-centered spatial equity evaluation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    17. Orvin, Muntahith Mehadil & Fatmi, Mahmudur Rahman & Chowdhury, Subeh, 2021. "Taking another look at cycling demand modeling: A comparison between two cities in Canada and New Zealand," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    18. Sakiru Adebola Solarin & Muhammed Sehid Gorus & Onder Ozgur, 2024. "Modelling the economic effect of inbound birth tourism: a random forest algorithm approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4223-4240, October.
    19. Murat Aslan & Onder Ozgur, 2024. "Financial dollarization and its effects on inflation and output in Turkey: a machine learning approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5777-5804, December.
    20. Maria A. F. Silva Dias & Yania Molina Souto & Bruno Biazeto & Enzo Todesco & Jose A. Zuñiga Mora & Dylana Vargas Navarro & Melvin Pérez Chinchilla & Carlos Madrigal Araya & Dayanna Arce Fernández & Be, 2024. "Reduction of Wind Speed Forecast Error in Costa Rica Tejona Wind Farm with Artificial Intelligence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-12, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14348-:d:1250235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.