IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14317-d1249692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modified Accuracy of RANS Modeling of Urban Pollutant Flow within Generic Building Clusters Using a High-Quality Full-Scale Dispersion Dataset

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Reza Kavian Nezhad

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Alberta, 5-1J Mechanical Engineering Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G8, Canada)

  • Khashayar RahnamayBahambary

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Alberta, 5-1J Mechanical Engineering Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G8, Canada)

  • Carlos F. Lange

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Alberta, 5-1J Mechanical Engineering Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G8, Canada)

  • Brian A. Fleck

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Alberta, 5-1J Mechanical Engineering Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G8, Canada)

Abstract

To improve the reliability of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of wind-driven pollutant dispersion within urban settings, a re-calibration study is conducted to optimize the standard k − ε model. A modified optimization framework based on the genetic algorithm is adapted to alleviate the computational expenses and to further identify ranges for each empirical coefficient to achieve the most reliable and accurate predictions. A robust objective function is defined, incorporating both the flow parameters and pollutant concentration through several linear and logarithmic measures. The coefficients are trained using high-quality and full-scale tracer experiments in a mock urban arrangement simulating a building array. The proposed ranges are 0.14 ≤ C μ ≤ 0.15 , 1.30 ≤ C ε 1 ≤ 1.46 , 1.68 ≤ C ε 2 ≤ 1.80 , 1.12 ≤ σ ε ≤ 1.20 , and 0.87 ≤ σ k ≤ 1.00 . A thorough evaluation of the predicted flow and concentration fields indicates the modified closure is effective. The fraction of predictions within the acceptable ranges from measurements has increased by 8% for pollutant concentration and 27% for turbulence kinetic energy. The generality of the calibrated model is further tested by modeling additional cases with different meteorological conditions, in which the calculated validation metrics attest to the noteworthy improvements in predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Reza Kavian Nezhad & Khashayar RahnamayBahambary & Carlos F. Lange & Brian A. Fleck, 2023. "Modified Accuracy of RANS Modeling of Urban Pollutant Flow within Generic Building Clusters Using a High-Quality Full-Scale Dispersion Dataset," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-31, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14317-:d:1249692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14317/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14317/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Qiang & Wang, Jianwen & Hou, Yali & Yuan, Renyu & Luo, Kun & Fan, Jianren, 2018. "Micrositing of roof mounting wind turbine in urban environment: CFD simulations and lidar measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1118-1133.
    2. Sarah Jamal Mattar & Mohammad Reza Kavian Nezhad & Michael Versteege & Carlos F. Lange & Brian A. Fleck, 2021. "Validation Process for Rooftop Wind Regime CFD Model in Complex Urban Environment Using an Experimental Measurement Campaign," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N. Aravindhan & M. P. Natarajan & S. Ponnuvel & P.K. Devan, 2023. "Recent developments and issues of small-scale wind turbines in urban residential buildings- A review," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(4), pages 1142-1169, June.
    2. Sarah Jamal Mattar & Mohammad Reza Kavian Nezhad & Michael Versteege & Carlos F. Lange & Brian A. Fleck, 2021. "Validation Process for Rooftop Wind Regime CFD Model in Complex Urban Environment Using an Experimental Measurement Campaign," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Juan, Yu-Hsuan & Rezaeiha, Abdolrahim & Montazeri, Hamid & Blocken, Bert & Wen, Chih-Yung & Yang, An-Shik, 2022. "CFD assessment of wind energy potential for generic high-rise buildings in close proximity: Impact of building arrangement and height," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    4. Juan, Yu-Hsuan & Wen, Chih-Yung & Li, Zhengtong & Yang, An-Shik, 2021. "Impacts of urban morphology on improving urban wind energy potential for generic high-rise building arrays," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    5. Juan, Y.-H. & Wen, C.-Y. & Chen, W.-Y. & Yang, A.-S., 2021. "Numerical assessments of wind power potential and installation arrangements in realistic highly urbanized areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Arteaga-López, Ernesto & Angeles-Camacho, César, 2021. "Innovative virtual computational domain based on wind rose diagrams for micrositing small wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    7. Dai, S.F. & Liu, H.J. & Chu, Y.J. & Lam, H.F. & Peng, H.Y., 2022. "Impact of corner modification on wind characteristics and wind energy potential over flat roofs of tall buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Xu, Wenhao & Li, Ye & Li, Gaohua & Li, Shoutu & Zhang, Chen & Wang, Fuxin, 2021. "High-resolution numerical simulation of the performance of vertical axis wind turbines in urban area: Part II, array of vertical axis wind turbines between buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 25-39.
    9. Li, Gang & Li, Yidian & Li, Jia & Huang, Huilan & Huang, Liyan, 2023. "Research on dynamic characteristics of vertical axis wind turbine extended to the outside of buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    10. Zahra Sefidgar & Amir Ahmadi Joneidi & Ahmad Arabkoohsar, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review on Development and Applications of Cross-Flow Wind Turbines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-39, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14317-:d:1249692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.