IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14290-d1249030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Green Supply Chain Formation and Government Subsidy Pricing Strategy Considering an Online Trading Platform

Author

Listed:
  • Wentao Gao

    (CIMS Research Center, School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Hao Zhang

    (CIMS Research Center, School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
    Engineering Research Center of Enterprise Digital Technology, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Jianfeng Lu

    (CIMS Research Center, School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
    Engineering Research Center of Enterprise Digital Technology, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Tiaojuan Han

    (CIMS Research Center, School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

Abstract

Low-carbon production is currently the development direction of enterprises. The government provides low-carbon subsidies to low-carbon manufacturing enterprises to promote the formation of a green supply chain. To better encourage the development of the green supply chain by determining government subsidies and platform authentication fees, this paper constructs a Stackelberg game model that consists of a supplier and a manufacturer, and solves the optimal decisions of each entity using the backward induction method. This study uses the matching method to analyze the payoff matrix for supply chain members when choosing between low-carbon and traditional production. After introducing the online trading platform, the impact of the platform on the profit of supply chain members is studied, considering whether the authentication service provided by the platform is completely accurate. The results show that (1) in the green supply chain, there is a relationship between the enterprises’ profit and the level of emissions reduction, which increases first and then decreases. (2) The online trading platform is conducive to achieving green supply chain coordination. The government can pay fewer subsidies to prompt the formation of a green supply chain and the optimal emissions reduction level of the enterprise is higher. (3) When the authentication mechanism of the platform is imperfect, the authentication fee of the platform and the subsidy coefficient of the government need to be set within a reasonable range to avoid the enterprise adopting traditional production pretending to be the low-carbon type. This study contributes to research on the green supply chain and provides insights into pricing strategies for governments and platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Wentao Gao & Hao Zhang & Jianfeng Lu & Tiaojuan Han, 2023. "Research on Green Supply Chain Formation and Government Subsidy Pricing Strategy Considering an Online Trading Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14290-:d:1249030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14290/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14290/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiutian Shi & Yuan Qian & Ciwei Dong, 2017. "Economic and Environmental Performance of Fashion Supply Chain: The Joint Effect of Power Structure and Sustainable Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Huang, Shuai & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Wang, Ningning, 2020. "Green subsidy modes and pricing strategy in a capital-constrained supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    3. Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai, 2017. "Manufacturer and retailer coordination for environmental and economic competitiveness: A power perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 268-281.
    4. Larissa Batrancea & Marcel Ciprian Pop & Malar Maran Rathnaswamy & Ioan Batrancea & Mircea-Iosif Rus, 2021. "An Empirical Investigation on the Transition Process toward a Green Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Bian, Junsong & Zhang, Guoqing & Zhou, Guanghui, 2020. "Manufacturer vs. Consumer Subsidy with Green Technology Investment and Environmental Concern," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 832-843.
    6. Chang Su & Xiaojing Liu & Wenyi Du, 2020. "Green Supply Chain Decisions Considering Consumers’ Low-Carbon Awareness under Different Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    7. Amit Basu & Sreekumar Bhaskaran & Rajiv Mukherjee, 2019. "An Analysis of Search and Authentication Strategies for Online Matching Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2412-2431, May.
    8. Chenglong Zhang & Jianqing Chen & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2022. "Two-Sided Platform Competition in a Sharing Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8909-8932, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiaojuan Han & Jianfeng Lu & Hao Zhang & Wentao Gao, 2024. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Providers’ and Demanders’ Low-Carbon Cooperation in Cloud Manufacturing Mode," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xia, Jing & Niu, Wenju & Chen, Xiaolin & Zhang, Lianmin, 2023. "Investing in a shared supplier to encourage environmental responsibility under spillovers and demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Yanfen Mu & Feng Niu, 2022. "To Be or Not to Be? Strategic Analysis of Carbon Tax Guiding Manufacturers to Choose Low-Carbon Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Xiutian Shi & Xiaoli Zhang & Ciwei Dong & Subin Wen, 2018. "Economic Performance and Emission Reduction of Supply Chains in Different Power Structures: Perspective of Sustainable Investment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Talay, Cagri & Oxborrow, Lynn & Brindley, Clare, 2020. "How small suppliers deal with the buyer power in asymmetric relationships within the sustainable fashion supply chain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 604-614.
    5. Chao Lu & Weilai Huang & Haifang Cheng, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Government Subsidy Policies in a Dynamic Green Supply Chain Considering Consumers Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Fang, Yuan & Yu, Yugang & Shi, Ye & Liu, Jie, 2020. "The effect of carbon tariffs on global emission control: A global supply chain model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Ciwei Dong & Qingying Li & Bin Shen & Xun Tong, 2019. "Sustainability in Supply Chains with Behavioral Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-7, July.
    8. Junjian Wu & Jennifer Shang, 2021. "Optimal Green Operation and Information Leakage Decisions under Government Subsidy and Supply Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Junyi Zhong & Jiazhen Huo, 2023. "How Does Green Store Brand Introduction Influence the Effects of Government Subsidy on Supply Chain Performance?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Xuyue Li, 2018. "Competing Retailers’ Environmental Investment: An Analysis under Different Power Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Tang, Wenzhi & Du, Shaofu & Hu, Li & Wang, Bill & Zhu, Yangguang, 2022. "The effects of leadership in Clean Development Mechanism low-carbon operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Yan Zhou & Xin-Tong Lin & Zhi-Ping Fan & Kar-Hung Wong, 2022. "Remanufacturing Strategy Choice of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Considering Carbon Emission Trading, Green Innovation, and Green Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-42, June.
    13. Dong, Ciwei & Liu, Qingyu & Shen, Bin, 2019. "To be or not to be green? Strategic investment for green product development in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 193-227.
    14. Hua Pan & Huimin Zhu & Minmin Teng, 2023. "Low-Carbon Transformation Strategy for Blockchain-Based Power Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    15. Doctor S. Nkosi & Thembani Moyo & Innocent Musonda, 2022. "Unlocking Land for Urban Agriculture: Lessons from Marginalised Areas in Johannesburg, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Kumar, Patanjal & Baraiya, Rajendra & Das, Debashree & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar & Xu, Lei & Mangla, Sachin Kumar, 2021. "Social responsibility and cost-learning in dyadic supply chain coordination," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    17. Jinxuan Song & Xu Yan, 2023. "Impact of Government Subsidies, Competition, and Blockchain on Green Supply Chain Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    18. Jin Li & Gary Pisano & Yejia Xu & Feng Zhu, 2023. "Marketplace Scalability and Strategic Use of Platform Investment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3958-3975, July.
    19. Chen, Xu & Li, Shanshan & Wang, Xiaojun, 2020. "Evaluating the effects of quality regulations on the pharmaceutical supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    20. Zhu, Zheng & Xu, Ailing & He, Qiao-Chu & Yang, Hai, 2021. "Competition between the transportation network company and the government with subsidies to public transit riders," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14290-:d:1249030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.