IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13696-d1239319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delimitation of Ecological Corridor Using Technological Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Vinícius Duarte Nader Mardeni

    (Postgraduate Programme in Forest Sciences, Forestry and Wood Sciences Department, Jerônimo Monteiro Campus, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, ES, Brazil)

  • Henrique Machado Dias

    (Postgraduate Programme in Forest Sciences, Forestry and Wood Sciences Department, Jerônimo Monteiro Campus, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, ES, Brazil)

  • Alexandre Rosa dos Santos

    (Postgraduate Programme in Forest Sciences, Forestry and Wood Sciences Department, Jerônimo Monteiro Campus, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, ES, Brazil)

  • Daniel Medina Corrêa Santos

    (School of Health and Education, São José University Center, Rio de Janeiro 21710-232, RJ, Brazil)

  • Tais Rizzo Moreira

    (Postgraduate Programme in Forest Sciences, Forestry and Wood Sciences Department, Jerônimo Monteiro Campus, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, ES, Brazil)

  • Rita de Cássia Freire Carvalho

    (Postgraduate Programme in Forest Sciences, Forestry and Wood Sciences Department, Jerônimo Monteiro Campus, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, ES, Brazil)

  • Elaine Cordeiro dos Santos

    (Postgraduate Programme in Forest Sciences, Forestry and Wood Sciences Department, Jerônimo Monteiro Campus, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, ES, Brazil)

  • Clebson Pautz

    (Postgraduate Programme in Forest Sciences, Forestry and Wood Sciences Department, Jerônimo Monteiro Campus, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, ES, Brazil)

  • Cecilia Uliana Zandonadi

    (Postgraduate Programme in Forest Sciences, Forestry and Wood Sciences Department, Jerônimo Monteiro Campus, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, ES, Brazil)

Abstract

Ecological corridors are effective strategies to address the environmental consequences of forest fragmentation by connecting fragmented areas through various techniques. This study aims to propose the implementation of an ecological corridor in the Itapemirim River basin in Espírito Santo, Brazil. The specific objectives of this study are as follows: delimiting the Permanent Preservation Areas (APPs) in the Itapemirim River watershed and comparing land use and land cover within these areas. The MapBiomas platform and Landsat 8 satellite images were utilized to map land use and land cover, while the criteria set by Law No. 12.651 were followed to define the APP boundaries. The calculation of the landscape ecology indices and the identification of the forest fragments with the highest potential for ecological corridor implementation were conducted using the Fuzzy logic. The QGIS 3.26 application, along with the LecoS 3.0.1 plugin and Fragstats 4.2, were employed to characterize and quantify landscape ecology indices. The costs assessment and determination of the optimal route for implementing the ecological corridor were performed, considering bothdistance and physical impediments. The least cost path algorithm was utilized, taking into account land use and land cover, APP, fragment potential, slope, and subnormal clusters. Evaluating land costs and expropriation expenses required to define the ecological corridor in the study area. The identified forest fragments for inclusion in the ecological corridor were the Caparaó National Park, the Serra das Torres State Natural Monument, and other selected fragments based on the application of Fuzzy logic to landscape ecology indices. The corridor route was determined using the least cost path algorithm, considering various factors. This study revealed that the predominant land use and land cover class in the area is pasture, and a significant portion (68.58%) of the designated Permanent Preservation Areas were in conflict with legal regulations. The bare land value per hectare for pasture was the second highest among the land use and land cover categories, accounting for 64.28% of the total. The priority area analysis indicated that 31.86% of the region had high or very high importance for forest restoration, while 42.97% had low or very low priority. The findings demonstrate that the least cost path algorithm, coupled with a multi-criteria decision-making approach using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), is a valuable tool for planning and implementing ecological networks. These methods effectively consider critical factors in decision-making processes related to the optimal location of the ecological corridor. In conclusion, this study provides insights into the implementation of an ecological corridor in the Itapemirim River basin, emphasizing the importance of considering multiple factors and utilizing appropriate methodologies for effective decision-making in ecological planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Vinícius Duarte Nader Mardeni & Henrique Machado Dias & Alexandre Rosa dos Santos & Daniel Medina Corrêa Santos & Tais Rizzo Moreira & Rita de Cássia Freire Carvalho & Elaine Cordeiro dos Santos & Cle, 2023. "Delimitation of Ecological Corridor Using Technological Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13696-:d:1239319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13696/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13696/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Hailong & Li, Dihua & Li, Ting & Qiao, Qing & Yang, Jian & Zhang, Hemin, 2010. "Application of least-cost path model to identify a giant panda dispersal corridor network after the Wenchuan earthquake—Case study of Wolong Nature Reserve in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(6), pages 944-952.
    2. José Maria Cardoso da Silva & Marcelo Tabarelli, 2000. "Tree species impoverishment and the future flora of the Atlantic forest of northeast Brazil," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6773), pages 72-74, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brannstrom, Christian, 2001. "Conservation-with-Development Models in Brazil's Agro-Pastoral Landscapes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1345-1359, August.
    2. Pütz, S. & Groeneveld, J. & Alves, L.F. & Metzger, J.P. & Huth, A., 2011. "Fragmentation drives tropical forest fragments to early successional states: A modelling study for Brazilian Atlantic forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(12), pages 1986-1997.
    3. Alados, Concepción L. & Pueyo, Yolanda & Escós, Juan & Andujar, Antonio, 2009. "Effects of the spatial pattern of disturbance on the patch-occupancy dynamics of juniper–pine open woodland," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(12), pages 1544-1550.
    4. Lingfan Ju & Yan Liu & Jin Yang & Mingshun Xiang & Qing Xiang & Wenkai Hu & Zhengyi Ding, 2023. "Construction of Nature Reserves’ Ecological Security Pattern Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Garze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Liang, Xinyuan & Jin, Xiaobin & He, Jie & Wang, Xiaorui & Xu, Cuilan & Qiao, Guoliang & Zhang, Xiaolin & Zhou, Yinkang, 2022. "Impacts of land management practice strategy on regional ecosystems: Enlightenment from ecological redline adjustment in Jiangsu, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Xiao Ouyang & Zhenbo Wang & Xiang Zhu, 2019. "Construction of the Ecological Security Pattern of Urban Agglomeration under the Framework of Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services Using Bayesian Network Machine Learning: Case Study of the Changsh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Jianying Xu & Feifei Fan & Yanxu Liu & Jianquan Dong & Jixing Chen, 2019. "Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Nature Reserves Based on Ecosystem Services and Circuit Theory: A Case Study in Wenchuan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Jiameng Hu & Yanfang Liu & Jian Fang, 2021. "Ecological Corridor Construction Based on Least-Cost Modeling Using Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Nighttime Light Data and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Dandara Monalisa Mariz Bezerra & Helder Farias Pereira Araujo & Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves, 2020. "Understanding the use of wild birds in a priority conservation area of Caatinga, a Brazilian tropical dry forest," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5297-5316, August.
    10. Trevisan, A.C.D. & Schmitt-Filho, A.L. & Farley, J. & Fantini, A.C. & Longo, C., 2016. "Farmer perceptions, policy and reforestation in Santa Catarina, Brazil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 53-63.
    11. Zhou Shen & Wei Wu & Ming Chen & Shiqi Tian & Jiao Wang, 2021. "Linking Greenspace Ecological Networks Optimization into Urban Expansion Planning: Insights from China’s Total Built Land Control Policy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13696-:d:1239319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.