IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13607-d1238026.html

What Determines the Digital Transformation of SRDI Enterprises?—A Study of the TOE Framework-Based Configuration

Author

Listed:
  • Peipei Qi

    (College of Wealth Management, Ningbo University of Finance & Economics, Ningbo 315175, China)

  • Can Xu

    (College of Wealth Management, Ningbo University of Finance & Economics, Ningbo 315175, China)

  • Qi Wang

    (School of Mechatronics and Energy Engineering, NingboTech University, Ningbo 315100, China)

Abstract

SRDI enterprises are a strong engine for the high-quality development of the economy and an important implementation body for the construction of a strong digital country. With the booming development of digital economy, digital transformation is one of the effective paths to empower the high-quality development of small and medium-sized enterprises. However, the digital transformation of SRDI enterprises is not a simple stacked combination of elements, but rather a complex linkage system that contains many conditional elements. The cracking of the digital transformation of SRDI enterprises urgently needs to be explored by the academic community. In order to analyze the key success factors of digital transformation in SRDI enterprises, to determine whether individual elements constitute the necessary conditions for the digital transformation of an enterprise, and to explore which antecedent configurations are more conducive to the success of an enterprise’s digital transformation, this study takes 39 “SRDI” enterprises in Zhejiang Province as samples and uses the Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) method. Based on the “technology-organization-environment” framework, it examines the digital transformation path of “SRDI” enterprises from a configurational perspective. The following results were found in this study: the group patterns leading to high levels of digital transformation can be divided into the following four types: organization-environment linkage, pressure-strategy synergy, organization-led, and total-factor-driven. The group patterns leading to low levels of digital transformation can be divided into the following four types: total-factor-deficient, single-technology type, technology-biased, and organization-deficient. A digital strategy is an important condition for SRDI enterprises to realize high-level digital transformation, and the external environmental influences contribute to the realization of digital transformation and upgrading of enterprises, with the pressure of industry competition being more critical.

Suggested Citation

  • Peipei Qi & Can Xu & Qi Wang, 2023. "What Determines the Digital Transformation of SRDI Enterprises?—A Study of the TOE Framework-Based Configuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13607-:d:1238026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13607/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13607/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Llopis-Albert, Carlos & Rubio, Francisco & Valero, Francisco, 2021. "Impact of digital transformation on the automotive industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Hess, Thomas & Matt, Christian & Benlian, Alexander & Wiesböck, Florian, 2016. "Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 81032, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Ritu Agarwal & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Catherine DesRoches & Ashish K. Jha, 2010. "Research Commentary ---The Digital Transformation of Healthcare: Current Status and the Road Ahead," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 796-809, December.
    4. Tekic, Zeljko & Koroteev, Dmitry, 2019. "From disruptively digital to proudly analog: A holistic typology of digital transformation strategies," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 683-693.
    5. Chun-Liang Chen & Yao-Chin Lin & Wei-Hung Chen & Cheng-Fu Chao & Henry Pandia, 2021. "Role of Government to Enhance Digital Transformation in Small Service Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Hess, Thomas & Matt, Christian & Benlian, Alexander & Wiesböck, Florian, 2016. "Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 82423, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oludapo, Samson & Carroll, Noel & Helfert, Markus, 2024. "Why do so many digital transformations fail? A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Cong Cheng & Hongfang Cui, 2024. "Combining digital and legacy technologies: firm digital transformation strategies—evidence from Chinese manufacturing companies," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Li, Fei & Zhang, Nana, 2025. "Digital transformation, innovation investment and quality," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Abdul Karim Feroz & Hangjung Zo & Ananth Chiravuri, 2021. "Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Isabella Urban & Ralf Plattfaut, 2026. "The Interplay of Digital Responsibility and Digital Transformation: Empirical Insights from a Nationwide Digital Transformation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 157-188, February.
    6. Cheng, Weixuan & Li, Cheng & Zhao, Tianjiao, 2024. "The stages of enterprise digital transformation and its impact on internal control: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Chouaibi, Salim & Festa, Giuseppe & Quaglia, Roberto & Rossi, Matteo, 2022. "The risky impact of digital transformation on organizational performance – evidence from Tunisia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    8. Kandampully, Jay & Bilgihan, Anil & Bujisic, Milos & Kaplan, Andreas & Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & Shukla, Yupal, 2021. "Service transformation: How can it be achieved?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 219-228.
    9. Krishna Kumar Dadsena & Pushpesh Pant & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Saurabh Pratap, 2024. "Overcoming strategies for supply chain digitization barriers: Implications for sustainable development goals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 3887-3910, July.
    10. Bastian Wurm & Christian Matt & Alexander Benlian & Thomas Hess, 2025. "A revised framework for digital transformation strategies: Contemporary insights and future research pathways," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Xin Zhang & Yaoyu Xu & Liang Ma, 2022. "Research on Successful Factors and Influencing Mechanism of the Digital Transformation in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Chen, Gaocai & Liu, Peng & Jiang, Aiying, 2024. "Does digital transformation in enterprises reduce debt default risk?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    13. Bruno Siano Rêgo & Shital Jayantilal & João J. Ferreira & Elias G. Carayannis, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Strategic Management: a Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 3195-3222, December.
    14. McCarthy, Pat & Sammon, David & Alhassan, Ibrahim, 2024. "The characteristics of digital transformation leadership: Theorizing the practitioner voice," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 411-423.
    15. Jure Erjavec & Mojca Indihar Štemberger & Jurij Jaklič, 2024. "How to Develop Organizational Forms for a Successful Digital Transformation? Findings from Two Case Studies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9576-9596, June.
    16. Wang, Yu & Huang, Cui & Ye, Xuanting & Zhang, Jian, 2025. "Linkage and coordination: Industrial digital transformation from the perspective of innovation ecosystem," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    17. Wang, Di & He, Bin & Dong, Nier & Yang, Daocheng, 2025. "Differentiated digital transformation strategies in manufacturing: The impact of firm ownership on productivity," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    18. Giovanni Bronzetti & Graziella Sicoli & Maurizio Rija & Anna Dominga Ippolito, 2024. "L?impatto della trasformazione digitale sulla performance aziendale. Un?analisi empirica sulle societ? quotate italiane," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2024(1), pages 109-130.
    19. Fengyuan Li, 2025. "The Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Organisational Efficiency in China: The Mediating Role of Information Disclosure," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    20. Robert Walter Dumisani Zondo, 2025. "Digitalisation: a transformational approach for productivity improvement in the food industry in South Africa," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(3), pages 278-289, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13607-:d:1238026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.