IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13417-d1235025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolutionary Characteristics and Interaction of Interdisciplinarity and Scientific Collaboration under the Convergence Paradigm: Analysis in the Field of Materials Genome Engineering

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Li

    (School of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Qian Yu

    (School of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Convergence has been proposed as a revolutionary innovation paradigm that advocates the integration of multidisciplinary knowledge through collaboration to solve complex real-world challenges. From a knowledge perspective, this study examined the evolutionary characteristics and interactions between interdisciplinarity and scientific collaboration in the context of the convergence paradigm using complex networks and bibliometric methods for publications (n = 35,227) in the materials genome engineering (MGE) field in China from 2000 to 2021. The findings are as follows: (1) Under the convergence paradigm, knowledge from five core disciplines forms the skeleton of the multidisciplinary knowledge system in the MGE field. The goal of interdisciplinarity gradually evolves from theoretical exploration to applied research, and the knowledge from various disciplines is increasingly integrated. (2) The development of the scientific collaboration network has gone through three phases: 2000–2009, 2005–2014, and 2015–2021, and its core-periphery structure has been gradually optimized. (3) The evolution of interdisciplinarity is nearly synchronized with the evolution of the scientific collaboration network. (4) The promotion of interdisciplinarity through collaboration is becoming increasingly evident. The proportion of interdisciplinary partnerships increased from 0.66 to 0.87, with the proportion of partnerships involving more than two disciplines increasing from 0.24 to 0.59. (5) Institutions from core and periphery disciplines have diverse partner selection preferences, and disciplinary characteristics related to knowledge similarity and complementarity are important factors influencing scientific collaboration behavior. This study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the convergence paradigm and provides insights for better incubating convergence research projects and advancing top-down innovation management in convergence fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Li & Qian Yu, 2023. "The Evolutionary Characteristics and Interaction of Interdisciplinarity and Scientific Collaboration under the Convergence Paradigm: Analysis in the Field of Materials Genome Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13417-:d:1235025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13417/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13417/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elisa Bellotti & Luka Kronegger & Luigi Guadalupi, 2016. "The evolution of research collaboration within and across disciplines in Italian Academia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 783-811, November.
    2. Guan, Jiancheng & Liu, Na, 2016. "Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 97-112.
    3. Joel A. C. Baum & Robin Cowan & Nicolas Jonard, 2010. "Network-Independent Partner Selection and the Evolution of Innovation Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(11), pages 2094-2110, November.
    4. Lin Zhang & Ronald Rousseau & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2016. "Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1257-1265, May.
    5. Caviggioli, Federico, 2016. "Technology fusion: Identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 55, pages 22-32.
    6. Daniela Martini & Giada Ragone & Francesco Cazzini & Federica Cheli & Giulia Formici & Caterina A. M. La Porta & Luciano Pinotti & Livia Pomodoro & Patrizia Restani & Lucia Scaffardi & Gabriella Tedes, 2021. "The Need for A Multidisciplinary Approach to Face Challenges Related to Food, Health, and Sustainability: The Contribution of CRC I-WE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Geraldo J. Pessoa Junior & Thiago M. R. Dias & Thiago H. P. Silva & Alberto H. F. Laender, 2020. "On interdisciplinary collaborations in scientific coauthorship networks: the case of the Brazilian community," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2341-2360, September.
    8. Chul Lee & Gunno Park & Jina Kang, 2018. "The impact of convergence between science and technology on innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 522-544, April.
    9. Yoonjung Jung & Euiseok Kim & Wonjoon Kim, 2021. "The scientific and technological interdisciplinary research of government research institutes: network analysis of the innovation cluster in South Korea," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 132-151, March.
    10. Muhammad Imam Ammarullah & Gatot Santoso & S. Sugiharto & Toto Supriyono & Dwi Basuki Wibowo & Ojo Kurdi & Mohammad Tauviqirrahman & J. Jamari, 2022. "Minimizing Risk of Failure from Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Prosthesis by Selecting Ceramic Materials Based on Tresca Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-12, October.
    11. Shiji Chen & Clément Arsenault & Yves Gingras & Vincent Larivière, 2015. "Exploring the interdisciplinary evolution of a discipline: the case of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1307-1323, February.
    12. Joachim Schummer, 2004. "Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 59(3), pages 425-465, March.
    13. Seongkyoon Jeong & Jong-Chan Kim & Jae Young Choi, 2015. "Technology convergence: What developmental stage are we in?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(3), pages 841-871, September.
    14. Miguel R. Guevara & Dominik Hartmann & Manuel Aristarán & Marcelo Mendoza & César A. Hidalgo, 2016. "The research space: using career paths to predict the evolution of the research output of individuals, institutions, and nations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1695-1709, December.
    15. Yan, Zheming & Du, Keru & Yang, Zhiming & Deng, Min, 2017. "Convergence or divergence? Understanding the global development trend of low-carbon technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 499-509.
    16. Cummings, Jonathon N. & Kiesler, Sara, 2007. "Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1620-1634, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongyu Zhou & Raf Guns & Tim C. E. Engels, 2022. "Are social sciences becoming more interdisciplinary? Evidence from publications 1960–2014," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(9), pages 1201-1221, September.
    2. Zhao, Shengchao & Zeng, Deming & Li, Jian & Feng, Ke & Wang, Yao, 2023. "Quantity or quality: The roles of technology and science convergence on firm innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Qian Xu & Hua Cheng, 2021. "Research on the Evolution of Textile Technological Convergence in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Su, Hsin-Ning & Moaniba, Igam M., 2017. "Investigating the dynamics of interdisciplinary evolution in technology developments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 12-23.
    5. Liming Zhao & Haihong Zhang & Wenqing Wu, 2019. "Cooperative knowledge creation in an uncertain network environment based on a dynamic knowledge supernetwork," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 657-685, May.
    6. Liu, Weiwei & Song, Yifan & Bi, Kexin, 2021. "Exploring the patent collaboration network of China's wind energy industry: A study based on patent data from CNIPA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Dejing Kong & Jianzhong Yang & Lingfeng Li, 2020. "Early identification of technological convergence in numerical control machine tool: a deep learning approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 1983-2009, December.
    8. Gupeng Zhang & Xiao Wang & Hongbo Duan, 2020. "Obscure but important: examining the indirect effects of alliance networks in exploratory and exploitative innovation paradigms," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 1745-1764, September.
    9. Park, Mingyu & Geum, Youngjung, 2022. "Two-stage technology opportunity discovery for firm-level decision making: GCN-based link-prediction approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    10. Yu-Wei Chang, 2019. "Are articles in library and information science (LIS) journals primarily contributed to by LIS authors?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(1), pages 81-104, October.
    11. Ying Tang & Xuming Lou & Zifeng Chen & Chengjin Zhang, 2020. "A Study on Dynamic Patterns of Technology Convergence with IPC Co-Occurrence-Based Analysis: The Case of 3D Printing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Hamid R. Jamali & Ghasem Azadi-Ahmadabadi & Saeid Asadi, 2018. "Interdisciplinary relations of converging technologies: Nano–Bio–Info–Cogno (NBIC)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 1055-1073, August.
    13. Alfonso Ávila-Robinson & Cristian Mejia & Shintaro Sengoku, 2021. "Are bibliometric measures consistent with scientists’ perceptions? The case of interdisciplinarity in research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7477-7502, September.
    14. Daniele Mascia & Francesca Pallotti & Federica Angeli, 2017. "Don’t stand so close to me: competitive pressures, proximity and inter-organizational collaboration," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(9), pages 1348-1361, September.
    15. Stefano Scarazzati & Lili Wang, 2019. "The effect of collaborations on scientific research output: the case of nanoscience in Chinese regions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 839-868, November.
    16. Xuefeng Wang & Zhinan Wang & Ying Huang & Yun Chen & Yi Zhang & Huichao Ren & Rongrong Li & Jinhui Pang, 2017. "Measuring interdisciplinarity of a research system: detecting distinction between publication categories and citation categories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 2023-2039, June.
    17. Sajad Ashouri & Anne-Laure Mention & Kosmas X. Smyrnios, 2021. "Anticipation and analysis of industry convergence using patent-level indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5727-5758, July.
    18. Jakob Hoffmann & Johannes Glückler, 2023. "Technological Cohesion and Convergence: A Main Path Analysis of the Bioeconomy, 1900–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Chin-Chang Tsai & Elizabeth A. Corley & Barry Bozeman, 2016. "Collaboration experiences across scientific disciplines and cohorts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(2), pages 505-529, August.
    20. Lin Zhang & Beibei Sun & Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Lixin Chen & Ying Huang, 2018. "Interdisciplinarity and collaboration: on the relationship between disciplinary diversity in departmental affiliations and reference lists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 271-291, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13417-:d:1235025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.