IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p12074-d1212086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Comprehensive Evaluation of Line Loss Lean Management Based on Big-Data-Driven Paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Li

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy-Saving Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Yuxiang Tan

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy-Saving Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Qingqing Guo

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy-Saving Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Weihuan Wang

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy-Saving Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

Abstract

Effective line loss management necessitates a model-driven evaluation method to assess its efficiency level thoroughly. This paper introduces a “model-driven + data-driven” approach based on collective intelligence theory to address the limitations of individual evaluation methods in conventional line loss assessments. Initially, eight different evaluation methods are used to form collective intelligence to evaluate the line loss management of power grid enterprises and generate a comprehensive dataset. Then, the data set is trained and evaluated using the random forest algorithm, with Spearman rank correlation coefficient as the test metric, to assess the power grid enterprise’s line loss management level. Combining model-driven and data-driven methods, this integrated approach efficiently leverages the informational value of indicator data while thoroughly considering the causal and associative attributes within the dataset. Based on data from 61 municipal grid enterprises, both the comparison of multiple AI methods and correlation tests of results verify the superiority of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Li & Yuxiang Tan & Qingqing Guo & Weihuan Wang, 2023. "Application of Comprehensive Evaluation of Line Loss Lean Management Based on Big-Data-Driven Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12074-:d:1212086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12074/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12074/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kwan Yi, 2012. "Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(12), pages 2488-2502, December.
    2. Kou, Gang & Lin, Changsheng, 2014. "A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 225-232.
    3. Mengting Yao & Yun Zhu & Junjie Li & Hua Wei & Penghui He, 2019. "Research on Predicting Line Loss Rate in Low Voltage Distribution Network Based on Gradient Boosting Decision Tree," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Thomas W. Malone & Mark Klein, 2007. "Harnessing Collective Intelligence to Address Global Climate Change," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 2(3), pages 15-26, July.
    5. Honglei Lu & Chunxiao Zhu & Xin Cao & Yen Hsu, 2022. "The Sustainability Evaluation of Masks Based on the Integrated Rank Sum Ratio and Entropy Weight Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    7. Boza, Pal & Evgeniou, Theodoros, 2021. "Artificial intelligence to support the integration of variable renewable energy sources to the power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    8. Kwan Yi, 2012. "Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(12), pages 2488-2502, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomashevskii, I.L., 2015. "Eigenvector ranking method as a measuring tool: Formulas for errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 774-780.
    2. Xuwei Pan & Shenglan He & Xiyong Zhu & Qingmiao Fu, 2016. "How users employ various popular tags to annotate resources in social tagging: An empirical study," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1121-1137, May.
    3. Jana Krejčí & Alessio Ishizaka, 2018. "FAHPSort: A Fuzzy Extension of the AHPSort Method," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1119-1145, July.
    4. Nina Almasifar & Tülay Özdemir Canbolat & Milad Akhavan & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2021. "Proposing a New Methodology for Monument Conservation “SCOPE MANAGEMENT” by the Use of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Project Management Institute System and the ICOMOS Burra Charter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    6. Wang, Ying-Ming & Elhag, Taha M.S., 2007. "A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 458-471, February.
    7. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    8. Xunjie Gou & Zeshui Xu & Huchang Liao, 2019. "Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Possibility Degree-Based Linear Assignment Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 35-63, January.
    9. Kaixin Gong & Weimin Ma & Hui Zhang & Mark Goh, 2023. "Heterogeneous Multi-attribute Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Considering Individual Concerns and Information Credibility," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1315-1349, December.
    10. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277998, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    11. Marios Tsioufis & Antonios Fytopoulos & Dimitra Kalaitzi & Thomas A. Alexopoulos, 2024. "Discovering maritime-piracy hotspots: a study based on AHP and spatio-temporal analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(2), pages 861-883, April.
    12. Wu, Chunying & Sun, Lingfang & Piao, Heng & Yao, Lijia, 2024. "Adaptive fuzzy finite time integral sliding mode control of the coordinated system for 350 MW supercritical once-through boiler unit to enhance flexibility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    13. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Viral Gupta & P. K. Kapur & Deepak Kumar, 2019. "Prioritizing and Optimizing Disaster Recovery Solution using Analytic Network Process and Multi Attribute Utility Theory," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 171-207, January.
    15. Rubio-Aliaga, Alvaro & García-Cascales, M. Socorro & Sánchez-Lozano, Juan Miguel & Molina-Garcia, Angel, 2021. "MCDM-based multidimensional approach for selection of optimal groundwater pumping systems: Design and case example," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 213-224.
    16. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Stochastic preference analysis in numerical preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 628-633.
    17. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    18. Jing Xu & Ren Zhang & Yangjun Wang & Hengqian Yan & Quanhong Liu & Yutong Guo & Yongcun Ren, 2022. "A New Framework for Assessment of Offshore Wind Farm Location," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Meimei Xia & Jian Chen & Juliang Zhang, 2015. "Multi-criteria decision making based on relative measures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 791-811, June.
    20. M Tavana & M A Sodenkamp, 2010. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis model for advanced technology assessment at Kennedy Space Center," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(10), pages 1459-1470, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12074-:d:1212086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.