IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11355-d1199239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment of Current Portuguese Railway and Future Decarbonization Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Tiago Ramos da Silva

    (Low Carbon & Resource Efficiency, R&Di, Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade, R. do Mirante 258, 4415-491 Grijó, Portugal)

  • Bruna Moura

    (Low Carbon & Resource Efficiency, R&Di, Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade, R. do Mirante 258, 4415-491 Grijó, Portugal)

  • Helena Monteiro

    (Low Carbon & Resource Efficiency, R&Di, Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade, R. do Mirante 258, 4415-491 Grijó, Portugal)

Abstract

Given the current EU decarbonization targets, the railway transport is a key player to boost mobility toward more sustainable transportation, as it is currently the cleanest high-volume mode of locomotion available. However, a study analyzing the life cycle environmental impact of the existing conventional Portuguese railway has never been performed. Aiming to address this research gap, this paper presents an attributional life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the environmental impacts of the Portuguese railway infrastructure and rolling stock, using the Douro line case study. Through the LCA methodology, the current setting (using electric and diesel rolling stock) and three scenarios of full-line electrification (considering 2019, 2030, and 2050 electricity mixes) were analyzed for hotspot identification and an outlook on EU-aligned long-term sustainability prospects. In the current scenario, railway operation accounts for 74% of the total carbon footprint, mostly due to the fuel use of diesel trains and the expended electricity of electric train and infrastructure operation. The total electrification of the line and rolling stock can reduce carbon emissions by 38%, 56%, and 63%, if the 2019, 2030, and 2050 electricity mixes are considered, respectively. Further reductions could also be achieved with on-site renewable energy generation and through future low-carbon construction work strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiago Ramos da Silva & Bruna Moura & Helena Monteiro, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Current Portuguese Railway and Future Decarbonization Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11355-:d:1199239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11355/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11355/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt7n29n303 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Clara Celauro & Andrea Cardella & Marco Guerrieri, 2023. "LCA of Different Construction Choices for a Double-Track Railway Line for Sustainability Evaluations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kamran Khan & Thomas Henschel, 2024. "LCT-Based Framework for the Assessment of Sustainability: From the Perspective of Literature Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kamran Khan & Thomas Henschel, 2024. "LCT-Based Framework for the Assessment of Sustainability: From the Perspective of Literature Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Marinella Giunta, 2023. "Trends and Challenges in Railway Sustainability: The State of the Art regarding Measures, Strategies, and Assessment Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Daniele Soraggi & Gabriele Ivano D’Amato, 2024. "The Limitations of EMSs in Comparison with the SDGs When Considering Infrastructure Sustainability: The Case of the Terzo Valico Dei Giovi, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11355-:d:1199239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.