IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11319-d1198589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Maize Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism under Yield Uncertainty Caused by Drought: A Study in the Heilongjiang Province of China

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Shi

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Fulin Wang

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Ying Wang

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Lili Jia

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

Deficient rainfall due to drought is an inevitable factor triggering maize yield uncertainty, thus affecting the performance and sustainability of the supply chain. Therefore, this paper first uses historical data to quantitatively fit the unfavorable effect of rainfall on maize yield affected by drought, taking the maize planting in the Heilongjiang Province of China as an example. Then, using a Stackelberg game, payback revenue sharing (PBRS), and cost revenue sharing (CRS), contract mechanisms are developed to coordinate the maize supply chain incorporating yield uncertainty from drought and demand risk faced by the retailer. We investigate the impact of uncertain maize yield on the supply chain and conduct numerical experiments to verify the analysis. The results reveal that declining rainfall, representing increasing drought severity, negatively affects the profits of the entire supply chain and its members; however, supply chain efficiency is raised under both coordinated contracts. In addition, the yield risk-sharing proportion was higher under a CRS mechanism than a PBRS one, which gives more incentives for the vulnerable supplier to participate in the supply chain. Finally, our analysis indicates that rearranging contract structures and parameters based on classic revenue sharing contracts could realize supply chain coordination.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Shi & Fulin Wang & Ying Wang & Lili Jia, 2023. "The Maize Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism under Yield Uncertainty Caused by Drought: A Study in the Heilongjiang Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11319-:d:1198589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11319/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11319/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, Edward & Monjardino, Marta, 2019. "Contract design in agriculture supply chains with random yield," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1072-1082.
    2. R. Quentin Grafton & Gary Libecap & Samuel McGlennon & Clay Landry & Bob O'Brien, 2011. "An Integrated Assessment of Water Markets: A Cross-Country Comparison," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 5(2), pages 219-239, Summer.
    3. Hongyong Fu & Jiawen Li & Yujie Li & Shengzhong Huang & Xiangkai Sun, 2018. "Risk Transfer Mechanism for Agricultural Products Supply Chain Based on Weather Index Insurance," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-17, August.
    4. Moreno-Miranda, Carlos & Dries, Liesbeth, 2022. "Integrating coordination mechanisms in the sustainability assessment of agri-food chains: From a structured literature review to a comprehensive framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Xia Zhao & Fangwei Wu, 2011. "Coordination Of Agri-Food Chain With Revenue-Sharing Contract Under Stochastic Output And Stochastic Demand," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 28(04), pages 487-510.
    6. Yong He & Xuan Zhao, 2016. "Contracts and coordination: Supply chains with uncertain demand and supply," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(4), pages 305-319, June.
    7. Qinghua Pang & Yuer Chen & Yulu Hu, 2014. "Three-Level Supply Chain Coordination under Disruptions Based on Revenue-Sharing Contract with Price Dependent Demand," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-11, December.
    8. Sammi Y. Tang & Panos Kouvelis, 2014. "Pay-Back-Revenue-Sharing Contract in Coordinating Supply Chains with Random Yield," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(12), pages 2089-2102, December.
    9. Yingxue Zhao & Xiaoge Meng & Shouyang Wang & T. C. Edwin Cheng, 2016. "Coordination of Supply Chains with Bidirectional Option Contracts," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Contract Analysis and Design for Supply Chains with Stochastic Demand, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 115-129, Springer.
    10. Shen, Mingrui & Shen, Jianfa, 2018. "Evaluating the cooperative and family farm programs in China: A rural governance perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 240-250.
    11. Yuqiang Wu & Weiwei Guo & Zigong Cai & Yang Tong & Jingpeng Chen, 2023. "Research on Contract Coordination Mechanism of Contract Farming Considering the Green Innovation Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan Shi & Fulin Wang, 2022. "Agricultural Supply Chain Coordination under Weather-Related Uncertain Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Jiarong Luo & Xu Chen & Chong Wang & Gaoxun Zhang, 2021. "Bidirectional options in random yield supply chains with demand and spot price uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(1), pages 211-230, July.
    3. Sarkar, P. & Wahab, M.I.M. & Fang, L., 2023. "Weather rebate contracts for different risk attitudes of supply chain members," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(1), pages 139-153.
    4. Fei Ye & Qiang Lin & Yina Li, 2020. "Coordination for contract farming supply chain with stochastic yield and demand under CVaR criterion," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 369-397, March.
    5. Tian, Xiaoge & Chen, Weiming & Hu, Jinglu, 2023. "Game-theoretic modeling of power supply chain coordination under demand variation in China: A case study of Guangdong Province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    6. Kimitoshi Sato & Kyoko Yagi & Masahito Shimazaki, 2018. "A Stochastic Inventory Model for a Random Yield Supply Chain with Wholesale-Price and Shortage Penalty Contracts," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(06), pages 1-30, December.
    7. Ding, Wen & Wan, Guohua, 2020. "Financing and coordinating the supply chain with a capital-constrained supplier under yield uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Nematollahi, Mohammadreza & Tajbakhsh, Alireza & Mosadegh Sedghy, Bahareh, 2021. "The reflection of competition and coordination on organic agribusiness supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Hong, Xianpei & He, Yimeng & Zhou, Pin & Chen, Jiguang, 2023. "Demand information sharing in a contract farming supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 560-577.
    10. Pan, Wenting & So, Kut C. & Xiao, Guang, 2022. "Benefits of backup sourcing for components in assembly systems under supply uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 158-171.
    11. Robert Costanza & Shuang Liu, 2014. "Ecosystem Services and Environmental Governance: Comparing China and the U.S," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 160-170, January.
    12. Liu, Duan & Yu, Nizhou & Wan, Hong, 2022. "Does water rights trading affect corporate investment? The role of resource allocation and risk mitigation channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    13. Ventura, José A. & Bunn, Kevin A. & Venegas, Bárbara B. & Duan, Lisha, 2021. "A coordination mechanism for supplier selection and order quantity allocation with price-sensitive demand and finite production rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    14. Stefan Ambec, 2020. "Environmental markets exacerbate inequalities," Working Papers hal-02945513, HAL.
    15. Xia Zhao & Ning Li & Liang Song, 2019. "Coordination of a Socially Responsible Two-Stage Supply Chain Under Random Demand," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(05), pages 1-27, October.
    16. Zuo, Alec & Nauges, Celine & Wheeler, Sarah, 2012. "Water trading as a risk-management tool for farmers: new empirical evidence from the Australian water market," Risk and Sustainable Management Group Working Papers 149885, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    17. Nguyen Thi Nha Trang & Thanh-Thuy Nguyen & Hong V. Pham & Thi Thu Anh Cao & Thu Huong Trinh Thi & Javad Shahreki, 2022. "Impacts of Collaborative Partnership on the Performance of Cold Supply Chains of Agriculture and Foods: Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, May.
    18. Cai, Jianhu & Hu, Xiaoqing & Jiang, Feiying & Zhou, Qing & Zhang, Xiaoyang & Xuan, Liyuan, 2019. "Optimal input quantity decisions considering commitment order contracts under yield uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 398-412.
    19. Donna, Javier & Espin-Sanchez, Jose, 2014. "The Illiquidity of Water Markets," MPRA Paper 55078, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Donna, Javier D. & Espin-Sanchez, Jose, 2018. "Are Water Markets Liquid? Evidence from Southeastern Spain," MPRA Paper 117032, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11319-:d:1198589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.