IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5582-d809492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Assessment of Junior High School Students’ Knowledge, Creativity, and Hands-On Performance Using PBL via Cognitive–Affective Interaction Model to Achieve STEAM

Author

Listed:
  • Hsien-Sheng Hsiao

    (Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City 106, Taiwan)

  • Jyun-Chen Chen

    (National Academy for Educational Research, New Taipei City 237, Taiwan)

  • Jhen-Han Chen

    (Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City 106, Taiwan)

  • Yu-Ting Zeng

    (Special Education Center, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City 106, Taiwan)

  • Guang-Han Chung

    (Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City 106, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study aimed to discover the implications of using different teaching approaches for a hands-on STEAM activity for junior high school students’ STEAM knowledge, creativity, and hands-on performance. The teaching contents used in the study were designed based on the project-based learning (PBL) strategy and the cognitive–affective interaction model (CAIM). The students’ learning outcomes were tested through a hands-on activity with the theme of electric boat creation. PBL with the CAIM was the strategy used to implement the hands-on STEAM activity and to achieve the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4). In this study, a quasi-experimental design was used for 10 weeks, and the 366 students who participated in the experiment were divided into experimental groups (EGs, 199 students using PBL with the CAIM) and control groups (CGs, 167 students using PBL only). Through the analysis of covariance, the results showed that students in the EGs achieved higher academic performance in terms of STEAM knowledge, creativity, and hands-on performance. The study also found that the hands-on STEAM activity had a positive effect on creativity for students in the EGs, allowing them to develop different modes of thinking in the processes of designing and producing the finished product, which in turn enhanced the innovativeness of their products and solutions. In addition, using PBL with the CAIM in the hands-on STEAM activity brought about positive learning outcomes and creative abilities for the students, achieving the SDG 4 objectives. Moreover, the outcomes of this study are in line with the current international trend in the development of education, providing reference examples for the future development of STEAM activities and teaching materials at the junior high school level.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsien-Sheng Hsiao & Jyun-Chen Chen & Jhen-Han Chen & Yu-Ting Zeng & Guang-Han Chung, 2022. "An Assessment of Junior High School Students’ Knowledge, Creativity, and Hands-On Performance Using PBL via Cognitive–Affective Interaction Model to Achieve STEAM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5582-:d:809492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5582/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5582/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin-Ok Kim & Jinsoo Kim, 2018. "Development and Application of Art Based STEAM Education Program Using Educational Robot," International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), IGI Global, vol. 10(3), pages 46-57, July.
    2. Peng-Wei Hsiao & Chung-Ho Su, 2021. "A Study on the Impact of STEAM Education for Sustainable Development Courses and Its Effects on Student Motivation and Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Thi Phuoc Lai Nguyen & Thi Huy Nguyen & Thanh Khiet Tran, 2020. "STEM Education in Secondary Schools: Teachers’ Perspective towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Ho, Manh-Toan & La, Viet-Phuong & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Pham, Thanh-Hang & Vuong, Thu-Trang & Vuong, Ha-My & Pham, Hung-Hiep & Hoang, Anh-Duc & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2020. "An analytical view on STEM education and outcomes: Examples of the social gap and gender disparity in Vietnam," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juliana Fosua Gyasi & Lanqin Zheng & Yidan Zhou, 2021. "Perusing the Past to Propel the Future: A Systematic Review of STEM Learning Activity Based on Activity Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Jamali, Seyedh Mahboobeh & Nader, Ale Ebrahim & Jamali, Fatemeh, 2021. "The Role of STEM Education in Improving the Quality of Education: A Bibliometric Study," MPRA Paper 114214, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 May 2022.
    3. Andra-Teodora Gorski & Elena-Diana Ranf & Dorel Badea & Elisabeta-Emilia Halmaghi & Hortensia Gorski, 2023. "Education for Sustainability—Some Bibliometric Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Dang, Hai-Anh H. & Hiraga, Masako & Viet Nguyen, Cuong, 2022. "Childcare and maternal employment: Evidence from Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & La, Viet-Phuong & Nguyen, Thanh-Huyen T. & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Vuong, Thu-Trang & Vuong, Ha-My & Ho, Manh-Toan, 2021. "Impacts of parents and reading promotion on creating a reading culture: Evidence from a developing context," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Ting-Chia Hsu & Hal Abelson & Natalie Lao & Shih-Chu Chen, 2021. "Is It Possible for Young Students to Learn the AI-STEAM Application with Experiential Learning?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Gregor Wolbring & Simerta Gill, 2023. "Potential Impact of Environmental Activism: A Survey and a Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-46, February.
    8. Nurfarahin Nasri & Nik Mohd Rahimi & Nurfaradilla Mohamad Nasri & Mohamad Asyraf Abd Talib, 2021. "A Comparison Study between Universal Design for Learning-Multiple Intelligence (UDL-MI) Oriented STEM Program and Traditional STEM Program for Inclusive Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Giancarlo Marcone, 2022. "Humanities and Social Sciences in Relation to Sustainable Development Goals and STEM Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Petr Coufal & Štěpán Hubálovský & Marie Hubálovská, 2021. "Application of Basic Graph Theory in Autonomous Motion of Robots," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Mindsponge, AISDL, 2022. "Release of guide for bayesvl version 1.0," OSF Preprints rs3zb, Center for Open Science.
    12. Gibellato, Simone & Ballestra, Luca Vincenzo & Fiano, Fabio & Graziano, Domenico & Luca Gregori, Gian, 2023. "The impact of education on the Energy Trilemma Index: A sustainable innovativeness perspective for resilient energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PB).
    13. Jason D. Johnson & Linda Smail & Darryl Corey & Adeeb M. Jarrah, 2022. "Using Bayesian Networks to Provide Educational Implications: Mobile Learning and Ethnomathematics to Improve Sustainability in Mathematics Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Yuli Rahmawati & Elisabeth Taylor & Peter Charles Taylor & Achmad Ridwan & Alin Mardiah, 2022. "Students’ Engagement in Education as Sustainability: Implementing an Ethical Dilemma-STEAM Teaching Model in Chemistry Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2021. "The bayesvl R package and ISR’s publications using Bayesian inference," OSF Preprints rx3c6, Center for Open Science.
    16. Mihaela-Elena Ulmeanu & Cristian-Vasile Doicin & Paulina Spânu, 2021. "Comparative Evaluation of Sustainable Framework in STEM Intensive Programs for Secondary and Tertiary Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-33, January.
    17. Zawar Shah & Shannon Kennedy-Clark & Yancong Xie & Md Shamsur Rahim & Mehregan Mahdavi & Andrew Levula, 2022. "Teacher Views on Teaching Sustainability in Higher Education Institutes in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Yasutaka Ozaki & Rajib Shaw, 2022. "Citizens’ Social Participation to Implement Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    19. repec:thr:techub:10024:y:2021:i:1:p:89-98 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Msawenkosi Sandile Mbokazi, 2021. "Water Wastage in Secondary Schools: A Case of Secondary Schools in Esikhaleni Circuit, King Cetshwayo District, KwaZulu-Natal," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 24(1), pages 89-98, October.
    21. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Le, Tam-Tri, 2022. "Planning for a new mindsponge-based methodological book," OSF Preprints bwz59, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5582-:d:809492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.