IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5444-d807008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Potential of Forestry’s Carbon-Neutral Contribution in China from 2021 to 2060

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Chen

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Buddhi Dayananda

    (School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Brendan Fu

    (School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Ziwen Li

    (Industrial Development Planning Institute, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Ziyu Jia

    (China Architecture Design and Research Group, China National Engineering Research Center for Human Settlement, Beijing 100120, China)

  • Yue Hu

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jiaxi Cao

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ying Liu

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Lumeng Xie

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ye Chen

    (Asia Pacific School of Business Administration, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Shuhong Wu

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Forest ecosystems play a crucial role in mitigating climate change. To assess and quantify the specific emissions reduction benefits of forest carbon sequestration, this study used a combination of backpropagation neural networks, biomass conversion factor method, and logistic models to predict the carbon-neutral contribution from existing forests, planned afforestation, and forest tending activities in China from 2021 to 2060. The results showed that (1) the emissions reduction contribution of forestry pathways in China was 7.91% (8588.61 MtCO 2 ) at the carbon peak stage and 8.71% (24,932.73 MtCO 2 ) at the carbon-neutral stage; (2) the southwest was the main contributing region, while the east and north lagged; (3) afforestation activities made the largest emission reduction contribution during the forecast period, while the contribution of existing forests continued to decline; and (4) carbon sequestration contribution by different forest origins was comparable during the carbon peak, while the contribution of plantation forests was expected to surpass that of natural forests during the carbon-neutral period. In order to maximize the benefits of the carbon-neutral pathway of forestry, it is necessary to enhance the policy frameworks related to forestry activities, forestry financial investment systems, and sustainable forest management systems to maximize the potential of this sector. Furthermore, more focus should be placed on reduction sectors to ensure the timely achievement of carbon goals and boost sustainable development in the context of climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Chen & Buddhi Dayananda & Brendan Fu & Ziwen Li & Ziyu Jia & Yue Hu & Jiaxi Cao & Ying Liu & Lumeng Xie & Ye Chen & Shuhong Wu, 2022. "Research on the Potential of Forestry’s Carbon-Neutral Contribution in China from 2021 to 2060," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5444-:d:807008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5444/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5444/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jialing Yu & Jian Wu, 2018. "The Sustainability of Agricultural Development in China: The Agriculture–Environment Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Irene Monasterolo & Stefano Battiston & Anthony C. Janetos & Zoey Zheng, 2017. "Vulnerable yet relevant: the two dimensions of climate-related financial disclosure," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 495-507, December.
    3. Theodore A. Endreny, 2018. "Strategically growing the urban forest will improve our world," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-3, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghazala Aziz & Zouheir Mighri, 2022. "Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Forestry in China: A Spatial Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-40, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irene Monasterolo & Monica Billio & Stefano Battiston, 2020. "The importance of compound risk in the nexus of COVID-19, climate change and finance," Working Papers 2020:15, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    2. Dorijan Radočaj & Ante Šiljeg & Rajko Marinović & Mladen Jurišić, 2023. "State of Major Vegetation Indices in Precision Agriculture Studies Indexed in Web of Science: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Sylwia Lorenc & Tomasz Leśniak & Arkadiusz Kustra & Maria Sierpińska, 2023. "Evolution of Business Models of Mining and Energy Sector Companies according to Current Market Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Curcio, Domenico & Gianfrancesco, Igor & Vioto, Davide, 2023. "Climate change and financial systemic risk: Evidence from US banks and insurers," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Monasterolo, Irene & de Angelis, Luca, 2020. "Blind to carbon risk? An analysis of stock market reaction to the Paris Agreement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Amber L. Pearson & Catherine D. Brown & Aaron Reuben & Natalie Nicholls & Karin A. Pfeiffer & Kimberly A. Clevenger, 2023. "Elementary Classroom Views of Nature Are Associated with Lower Child Externalizing Behavior Problems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Tianyue Ma & Jing Li & Shuang Bai & Fangzhe Chang & Zhai Jiang & Xingguang Yan & Jiahao Shao, 2022. "Optimization and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Natural and Cultivated Land Disturbance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Gutiérrez-López, Cristina & Castro, Paula & Tascón, María T., 2022. "How can firms' transition to a low-carbon economy affect the distance to default?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    9. Kemfert, Claudia & Präger, Fabian & Braunger, Isabell & Hoffart, Franziska M. & Brauers, Hanna, 2022. "The expansion of natural gas infrastructure puts energy transitions at risk," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7, pages 582-587.
    10. Hongyun Han & Shu Wu, 2018. "Structural Change and Its Impact on the Energy Intensity of Agricultural Sector in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Jakub Sikora & Marcin Niemiec & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Joanna Kapusta-Duch & Maciej Kuboń & Monika Komorowska & Joanna Karcz, 2019. "Impact of Integrated and Conventional Plant Production on Selected Soil Parameters in Carrot Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Truzaar Dordi & Olaf Weber, 2019. "The Impact of Divestment Announcements on the Share Price of Fossil Fuel Stocks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Popescu, Ioana-Stefania & Gibon, Thomas & Hitaj, Claudia & Rubin, Mirco & Benetto, Enrico, 2023. "Are SRI funds financing carbon emissions? An input-output life cycle assessment of investment funds," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    14. Antoine GODIN & Paul HADJI-LAZARO, 2020. "Demand-induced transition risks: A systemic approach applied to South Africa," Working Paper 1ec2dacf-58b9-4235-8d35-4, Agence française de développement.
    15. Lai, Zhaohao & Chen, Meiqiu & Liu, Taoju, 2020. "Changes in and prospects for cultivated land use since the reform and opening up in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    16. D’Orazio, Paola & Popoyan, Lilit, 2019. "Fostering green investments and tackling climate-related financial risks: Which role for macroprudential policies?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 25-37.
    17. Guofeng Wang & Ziyu Qian & Xiangzheng Deng, 2020. "Analysis of Environmental Policy and the Performance of Sustainable Agricultural Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Tianqi Zhang & Yue Zhou & Ming Li & Haoran Zhang & Tong Wang & Yu Tian, 2022. "Impacts of Urbanization on Drainage System Health and Sustainable Drainage Recommendations for Future Scenarios—A Small City Case in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Dafermos, Yannis & Nikolaidi, Maria, 2021. "How can green differentiated capital requirements affect climate risks? A dynamic macrofinancial analysis," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Ingo Kowarik & Anne Hiller & Greg Planchuelo & Birgit Seitz & Moritz von der Lippe & Sascha Buchholz, 2019. "Emerging Urban Forests: Opportunities for Promoting the Wild Side of the Urban Green Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5444-:d:807008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.