IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5375-d805650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Prescribed Burning on Soil CO 2 Emissions from Pinus yunnanensis Forestland in Central Yunnan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Yang

    (College of Ecology and Environment, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
    Research Institute of Rocky Desertification, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Qibo Chen

    (College of Ecology and Environment, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
    Research Institute of Rocky Desertification, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Shunqing Gong

    (College of Ecology and Environment, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Yue Zhao

    (College of Ecology and Environment, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Denghui Song

    (College of Ecology and Environment, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Jianqiang Li

    (College of Ecology and Environment, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

Abstract

The effects of low-intensity and high-frequency prescribed burning on the soil CO 2 emissions from Pinus yunnanensis forestland should be explored to achieve sustainable operation and management under fire disturbance. A Li-6400XT portable photosynthesis meter (equipped with a Li-6400-09 soil respiration chamber) and a TRIME ® -PICO 64/32 soil temperature and moisture meter were used to measure the soil CO 2 flux, soil temperature, and soil moisture at fixed observation sites in two treatments (i.e., unburned (UB) and after prescribed burning (AB)) in a Pinus yunnanensis forest of Zhaobi Mountain, Xinping County, Yunnan, China from March 2019 to February 2021. We also determined the relationships between the soil CO 2 flux and soil hydrothermal factors. The results showed that (1) the soil CO 2 flux in both UB and AB plots exhibited a significant unimodal trend of seasonal variations. In 2020, the highest soil CO 2 fluxes occurred in September; they were 7.08 μmol CO 2 ·m −2 ·s −1 in the morning and 7.63 μmol CO 2 ·m −2 ·s −1 in the afternoon in the AB treatment, which was significantly lower than those in the UB treatment ( p < 0.05). The AB and the UB treatment showed no significant differences in annual soil carbon flux ( p > 0.05). (2) The relationship between the soil CO 2 flux and moisture in the AB and UB plots was best fitted by a quadratic function, with a degree of fitting between 0.435 and 0.753. The soil CO 2 flux and soil moisture showed an inverted U-shaped correlation in the UB plot ( p < 0.05) but a positive correlation in the AB plot ( p < 0.05). Soil moisture was the key factor affecting the soil CO 2 flux ( p < 0.05), while soil temperature showed no significant effect on soil CO 2 flux in this area ( p > 0.05). Therefore, the application of low-intensity prescribed burning for fire hazard reduction in this region achieved the objective without causing a persistent and drastic increase in the soil CO 2 emissions. The results could provide important theoretical support for scientific implementation of prescribed burning, as well as scientific evaluation of ecological and environmental effects after prescribed burning.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Yang & Qibo Chen & Shunqing Gong & Yue Zhao & Denghui Song & Jianqiang Li, 2022. "Effects of Prescribed Burning on Soil CO 2 Emissions from Pinus yunnanensis Forestland in Central Yunnan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5375-:d:805650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5375/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5375/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yiqi Luo & Shiqiang Wan & Dafeng Hui & Linda L. Wallace, 2001. "Acclimatization of soil respiration to warming in a tall grass prairie," Nature, Nature, vol. 413(6856), pages 622-625, October.
    2. Ben Bond-Lamberty & Allison Thomson, 2010. "Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record," Nature, Nature, vol. 464(7288), pages 579-582, March.
    3. David Haaf & Johan Six & Sebastian Doetterl, 2021. "Global patterns of geo-ecological controls on the response of soil respiration to warming," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(7), pages 623-627, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iain P. Hartley & Tim C. Hill & Sarah E. Chadburn & Gustaf Hugelius, 2021. "Temperature effects on carbon storage are controlled by soil stabilisation capacities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-7, December.
    2. Daifeng Xiang & Gangsheng Wang & Jing Tian & Wanyu Li, 2023. "Global patterns and edaphic-climatic controls of soil carbon decomposition kinetics predicted from incubation experiments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Wei Wang & Wenjing Zeng & Weile Chen & Hui Zeng & Jingyun Fang, 2013. "Soil Respiration and Organic Carbon Dynamics with Grassland Conversions to Woodlands in Temperate China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-10, August.
    4. Jinshi Jian & Vanessa Bailey & Kalyn Dorheim & Alexandra G. Konings & Dalei Hao & Alexey N. Shiklomanov & Abigail Snyder & Meredith Steele & Munemasa Teramoto & Rodrigo Vargas & Ben Bond-Lamberty, 2022. "Historically inconsistent productivity and respiration fluxes in the global terrestrial carbon cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Yuanyuan Wang & Zhenghua Hu & A. R. M. Towfiqul Islam & Shutao Chen & Dongyao Shang & Ying Xue, 2019. "Effect of Warming and Elevated O 3 Concentration on CO 2 Emissions in a Wheat-Soybean Rotation Cropland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Bo Song & Zhixiang Wu & Lu Dong & Chuan Yang & Siqi Yang, 2023. "Variation of Stem CO 2 Efflux and Estimation of Its Contribution to the Ecosystem Respiration in an Even-Aged Pure Rubber Plantation of Hainan Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Zhang, Bingquan & Xu, Jialu & Lin, Zhixian & Lin, Tao & Faaij, André P.C., 2021. "Spatially explicit analyses of sustainable agricultural residue potential for bioenergy in China under various soil and land management scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Hongbo Guo & Enzai Du & César Terrer & Robert B. Jackson, 2024. "Global distribution of surface soil organic carbon in urban greenspaces," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Yuyang Yu & Jing Li & Zixiang Zhou & Li Zeng & Cheng Zhang, 2019. "Estimation of the Value of Ecosystem Carbon Sequestration Services under Different Scenarios in the Central China (the Qinling-Daba Mountain Area)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Shuai Ren & Tao Wang & Bertrand Guenet & Dan Liu & Yingfang Cao & Jinzhi Ding & Pete Smith & Shilong Piao, 2024. "Projected soil carbon loss with warming in constrained Earth system models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Decheng Zhou & Lu Hao & John B. Kim & Peilong Liu & Cen Pan & Yongqiang Liu & Ge Sun, 2019. "Potential impacts of climate change on vegetation dynamics and ecosystem function in a mountain watershed on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 31-50, September.
    12. Xiaojie Wang & Qian Zhang & Nan Shan & Hongyan Guo, 2023. "The Impacts of Elevated CO 2 Levels on Environmental Risk of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils: Applicable Remediation Approaches for Integrated Benefits," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-8, August.
    13. Yanan Liang & Yanpeng Cai & Junxia Yan & Hongjian Li, 2019. "Estimation of Soil Respiration by Its Driving Factors Based on Multi-Source Data in a Sub-Alpine Meadow in North China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Wu, Si Hong & Jansson, Per-Erik & Kolari, Pasi, 2011. "Modeling seasonal course of carbon fluxes and evapotranspiration in response to low temperature and moisture in a boreal Scots pine ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(17), pages 3103-3119.
    15. Kaiqiang Bao & Haifeng Tian & Min Su & Liping Qiu & Xiaorong Wei & Yanjiang Zhang & Jian Liu & Hailong Gao & Jimin Cheng, 2019. "Stability of Ecosystem CO 2 Flux in Response to Changes in Precipitation in a Semiarid Grassland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Qu, Feng & Zhang, Qi & Jiang, Zhaoxi & Zhang, Caihong & Zhang, Zhi & Hu, Xiaohui, 2022. "Optimizing irrigation and fertilization frequency for greenhouse cucumber grown at different air temperatures using a comprehensive evaluation model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    17. Bharati Kollah & Garima Dubey & Peter Dunfield & Santosh Mohanty, 2015. "Influence of bioenergy crop Jatropha curcas amendment on soil biogeochemistry in a tropical vertisol," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 1459-1470, December.
    18. Jiqun Wen & Xiaowei Chuai & Shanchi Li & Song Song & Jiasheng Li & Xiaomin Guo & Lei Yang, 2018. "Spatial-Temporal Changes of Soil Respiration across China and the Response to Land Cover and Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Guojin Chen & Wenpeng Chen & Jiaqi Wang & Xiangqin Zhao, 2023. "High‐temperature exposure risk, corporate performance and pricing efficiency of the stock market," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3553-3583, September.
    20. Bhatia, Shashi Kant & Bhatia, Ravi Kant & Jeon, Jong-Min & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Yang, Yung-Hun, 2019. "Carbon dioxide capture and bioenergy production using biological system – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 143-158.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5375-:d:805650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.