IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3332-d769621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety Measures and Risk Analysis for Outdoor Recreation Technicians and Practitioners: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Mata

    (Departamento de Desporto e Saúde, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, 7000-645 Évora, Portugal
    Centro de Investigação em Qualidade de Vida (CIEQV), 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal
    Escola Superior de Desporto de Rio Maior, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal)

  • Catarina Pereira

    (Departamento de Desporto e Saúde, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, 7000-645 Évora, Portugal
    Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), University of Évora, 7000-645 Évora, Portugal)

  • Luís Carvalhinho

    (Escola Superior de Desporto de Rio Maior, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal
    Centro de Investigação Desenvolvimento e Inovação em Turismo (CiTUR), Campus da Penha, Universidade do Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal)

Abstract

There is no expectation to suppress all accidents in the outdoor recreation sector; nevertheless, it is expected that all possible safety measures are taken in order to minimize the risk of accidents. The objective of this study was to systematize the knowledge regarding recommended and used safety measures and risk assessments for technicians and outdoor recreation practitioners. We conducted a systematic review on PubMed, BVS, SciELO, Science Direct, ABI/INFORM, Spinger, Web of Knowledge, and Esmerald full text databases, up to February 2021. The eligible criteria followed the PICOS strategy; the included risk assessment studies on outdoor recreation (according to its definition) had methodological quality, were indexed, and peer reviewed. Ten studies, from ten countries, fulfilled these specifications, which focused on different approaches. Five studies focused on risk perception, four studies focused on safety practices, injuries, and risk assessment; three studies addressed safe behaviors; two studies addressed equipment- and risk matrix-related themes. We concluded that there was a concern for this topic, and the 28 mentioned measures could provide important information regarding health and prevention. These measures could be used to develop safety strategies and risk reduction, aimed at reducing accidents in outdoor recreation activities. In order to evaluate the pertinence and importance of the mentioned measures, namely risk perception, safe practices, sport injuries, risk analysis, safe behaviors, as well as equipment and risk assessment matrices, further investigation is needed using experimental or observational designs. These strategies and procedures can contribute to enhanced interventions by technicians with higher security and quality, and therefore, improved well-being and satisfaction of practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Mata & Catarina Pereira & Luís Carvalhinho, 2022. "Safety Measures and Risk Analysis for Outdoor Recreation Technicians and Practitioners: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3332-:d:769621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3332/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3332/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grant Purdy, 2010. "ISO 31000:2009—Setting a New Standard for Risk Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 881-886, June.
    2. Houge Mackenzie, Susan & Kerr, John H., 2013. "Stress and emotions at work: An adventure tourism guide's experiences," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 3-14.
    3. Buckley, Ralf, 2012. "Rush as a key motivation in skilled adventure tourism: Resolving the risk recreation paradox," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 961-970.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konu, Henna, 2015. "Developing a forest-based wellbeing tourism product together with customers – An ethnographic approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-16.
    2. Buckley, Ralf & McDonald, Kristen & Duan, Lian & Sun, Lin & Chen, Lan Xue, 2014. "Chinese model for mass adventure tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 5-13.
    3. Mehdi Khakpour & Jan Ketil Rød, 2016. "An attraction-based cellular automaton model for generating spatiotemporal population maps in urban areas," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(2), pages 297-319, March.
    4. José Ruiz-Canela López, 2021. "How Can Enterprise Risk Management Help in Evaluating the Operational Risks for a Telecommunications Company?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    5. IJspeert, Ruth & Hernandez-Maskivker, Gilda, 2020. "Active sport tourists: Millennials vs baby boomers," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6, pages 12-20.
    6. Houge Mackenzie, Susan & Kerr, John H., 2013. "Stress and emotions at work: An adventure tourism guide's experiences," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 3-14.
    7. Dr Jason Mwanza & Nothando Tshuma, 2023. "Mitigating Business Risk in Manufacturing SMEs: A nexus between informal and formal business risk management: A case of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(1), pages 1107-1138, January.
    8. Ladan Ghahramani & Jalayer Khalilzadeh & Birendra KC, 2018. "Tour guides’ communication ecosystems: an inferential social network analysis approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 103-130, December.
    9. Ivo Häring & Mirjam Fehling-Kaschek & Natalie Miller & Katja Faist & Sebastian Ganter & Kushal Srivastava & Aishvarya Kumar Jain & Georg Fischer & Kai Fischer & Jörg Finger & Alexander Stolz & Tobias , 2021. "A performance-based tabular approach for joint systematic improvement of risk control and resilience applied to telecommunication grid, gas network, and ultrasound localization system," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 286-329, June.
    10. Raggiotto, Francesco & Scarpi, Daniele, 2020. "Living on the edge: Psychological drivers of athletes’ intention to re-patronage extreme sporting events," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 229-241.
    11. Keane, Matthew & Eastman, Jacqueline K. & Iyer, Rajesh, 2020. "Predicting adventure seeking of young adults: The role of risk, innovativeness and status consumption," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 952-963.
    12. Tsaur, Sheng-Hshiung & Lin, Wei-Rong & Liu, Jui Shiang, 2013. "Sources of challenge for adventure tourists: Scale development and validation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 85-93.
    13. Tomazos, Kostas & O'Gorman, Kevin & MacLaren, Andrew C, 2017. "From leisure to tourism: How BDSM demonstrates the transition of deviant pursuits to mainstream products," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 30-41.
    14. Jérôme Boutang & Michel de Lara, 2016. "Risk Marketing," Working Papers hal-01353821, HAL.
    15. Holm, Michelle R. & Lugosi, Peter & Croes, Robertico R. & Torres, Edwin N., 2017. "Risk-tourism, risk-taking and subjective well-being: A review and synthesis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 115-122.
    16. Laura Bitomsky & Olga Bürger & Björn Häckel & Jannick Töppel, 2020. "Value of data meets IT security – assessing IT security risks in data-driven value chains," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 589-605, September.
    17. Zhibin Niu & Runlin Li & Junqi Wu & Yaqi Xue & Jiawan Zhang, 2020. "regvis.net -- A Visual Bibliography of Regulatory Visualization," Papers 2007.03573, arXiv.org.
    18. Jerry Selvaseelan, 2018. "Development and Introduction of the Risk-Sentience Auxiliary Framework (RSAF) as an Enabler to the ISO 31000 and ISO 31010 for High-Risk Environments," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, June.
    19. Mkono, Muchazondida & Ruhanen, Lisa & Markwell, Kevin, 2015. "From netnography to autonetnography in tourism studies," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 167-169.
    20. Marjetka Rangus & Srðan Miloševic & Iva Škrbic & Bojana Radenkovic-Šošic & Jože Hocevar & Mladen Kneževic, 2020. "Professional and Organisational Commitment in the Hospitality Sector," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 13(2), pages 179-191.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3332-:d:769621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.