IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p3013-d764386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid Differential Evolution-Based Regression Tree Model for Predicting Downstream Dam Hazard Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader

    (Structural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt)

  • Abobakr Al-Sakkaf

    (Department of Buildings, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada
    Department of Architecture & Environmental Planning, College of Engineering & Petroleum, Hadhramout University, Mukalla 50512, Yemen)

  • Ghasan Alfalah

    (Department of Architecture and Building Science, College of Architecture and Planning, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nehal Elshaboury

    (Housing and Building National Research Centre, Construction and Project Management Research Institute, Giza 12311, Egypt)

Abstract

There are a large number of dams throughout the United States, and a considerable portion of them are categorized as having high hazard potential. This state of affairs constitutes a challenge, especially when coupled with their rapid deterioration. As such, this research paper proposes an optimized data-driven model for the fast and efficient prediction of dam hazard potential. The proposed model is envisioned on two main components, namely model development and model assessment. In the first component, a hybridization of the differential evolution algorithm and regression tree to forecast downstream dam hazard potential is proposed. In this context, the differential evolution (DE) algorithm is deployed to: (1) automatically retrieve the optimal set of input features affecting dam hazard potential; and (2) amplify the search mechanism of regression tree (REGT) through optimizing its hyper parameters. As for the second component, the developed DE-REGT model is validated using four folds of comparative assessments to evaluate its prediction capabilities. In the first fold, the developed DE-REGT model is trialed against nine highly regarded machine learning and deep learning models. The second fold is designated to structure, an integrative ranking of the investigated data-driven models, counting on their scores in the performance evaluation metrics. The third fold is used to study the effectiveness of using differential evolution for the hyper parameter optimization of regression tree. The fourth fold aims at testing the usefulness of using differential evolution as a feature extractor algorithm. Performance comparative analysis demonstrated that the developed DE-REGT model outperformed the remainder of the data-driven models. It accomplished mean absolute percentage error, relative absolute error, mean absolute error, root squared error, root mean squared error and a Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency of 9.62%, 0.27, 0.17, 0.31, 0.41 and 0.74, respectively. Results also revealed that the developed model managed to perform better than other meta-heuristic-based regression tree models and classical feature extraction algorithms, exemplifying the appropriateness of using differential evolution for hyper parameter optimization and feature extraction. It can be argued that the developed model could assist policy makers in the prioritization of their maintenance management plans and reduce impairments caused by the failure or misoperation of dams.

Suggested Citation

  • Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader & Abobakr Al-Sakkaf & Ghasan Alfalah & Nehal Elshaboury, 2022. "Hybrid Differential Evolution-Based Regression Tree Model for Predicting Downstream Dam Hazard Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3013-:d:764386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3013/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guanjie He & Junrui Chai & Yuan Qin & Zengguang Xu & Shouyi Li, 2020. "Coupled Model of Variable Fuzzy Sets and the Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Application to the Social and Environmental Impact Evaluation of Dam Breaks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(9), pages 2677-2697, July.
    2. Ki Hwan Kim & Moon S. Nam & Hoon Hee Hwang & Ki Yong Ann, 2020. "Prediction of Remaining Life for Bridge Decks Considering Deterioration Factors and Propose of Prioritization Process for Bridge Deck Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Haiyun Shi & Ji Chen & Suning Liu & Bellie Sivakumar, 2019. "The Role of Large Dams in Promoting Economic Development under the Pressure of Population Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Aertsen, Wim & Kint, Vincent & van Orshoven, Jos & Özkan, Kürşad & Muys, Bart, 2010. "Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(8), pages 1119-1130.
    5. Örkcü, H. Hasan & Aksoy, Ertugˇrul & Dogˇan, Mustafa İsa, 2015. "Estimating the parameters of 3-p Weibull distribution through differential evolution," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 211-224.
    6. Lamine Diop & Saeed Samadianfard & Ansoumana Bodian & Zaher Mundher Yaseen & Mohammad Ali Ghorbani & Hana Salimi, 2020. "Annual Rainfall Forecasting Using Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Model: Integration of Multilayer Perceptron with Whale Optimization Algorithm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(2), pages 733-746, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarmad Dashti Latif & Ali Najah Ahmed, 2023. "A review of deep learning and machine learning techniques for hydrological inflow forecasting," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12189-12216, November.
    2. Eriyagama, Nishadi & Smakhtin, V. & Udamulla, L., 2021. "Sustainable surface water storage development pathways and acceptable limits for river basins," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-13(5):645.
    3. Seyed Naghibi & Hamid Pourghasemi, 2015. "A Comparative Assessment Between Three Machine Learning Models and Their Performance Comparison by Bivariate and Multivariate Statistical Methods in Groundwater Potential Mapping," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(14), pages 5217-5236, November.
    4. Nehal Elshaboury & Tarek Attia & Mohamed Marzouk, 2020. "Comparison of Several Aggregation Techniques for Deriving Analytic Network Process Weights," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(15), pages 4901-4919, December.
    5. Kitikidou, Kyriaki & Petrou, Petros & Milios, Elias, 2012. "Dominant height growth and site index curves for Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) in central Cyprus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1323-1329.
    6. Alexandra M. Thorn & Jonathan R. Thompson & Joshua S. Plisinski, 2016. "Patterns and Predictors of Recent Forest Conversion in New England," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Liansheng Sang & Jun Wang & Jueyi Sui & Mauricio Dziedzic, 2022. "A New Approach for Dam Safety Assessment Using the Extended Cloud Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(15), pages 5785-5798, December.
    8. Pedro H. M. Nascimento & Vinícius A. Cabral & Ivo C. Silva Junior & Frederico F. Panoeiro & Leonardo M. Honório & André L. M. Marcato, 2021. "Spillage Forecast Models in Hydroelectric Power Plants Using Information from Telemetry Stations and Hydraulic Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Emre Topçu, 2022. "Appraisal of seasonal drought characteristics in Turkey during 1925–2016 with the standardized precipitation index and copula approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(1), pages 697-723, May.
    10. Saeedeh Eskandari & Mahdis Amiri & Nitheshnirmal Sãdhasivam & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, 2020. "Comparison of new individual and hybrid machine learning algorithms for modeling and mapping fire hazard: a supplementary analysis of fire hazard in different counties of Golestan Province in Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 305-327, October.
    11. Zhenlong Shen & Yongjian Liu & Jiang Liu & Zeyu Liu & Shi Han & Shiyong Lan, 2023. "A Decision-Making Method for Bridge Network Maintenance Based on Disease Transmission and NSGA-II," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Kint, V. & Aertsen, W. & Fyllas, N.M. & Trabucco, A. & Janssen, E. & Özkan, K. & Muys, B., 2014. "Ecological traits of Mediterranean tree species as a basis for modelling forest dynamics in the Taurus mountains, Turkey," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 286(C), pages 53-65.
    13. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Milad Alizadeh Jabehdar & Vida Davidavičienė & Mohammad Ali Ghorbani & Saad Sh. Sammen, 2021. "A Simple Way to Increase the Prediction Accuracy of Hydrological Processes Using an Artificial Intelligence Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Aleksandr Lebedev & Valery Kuzmichev, 2020. "Verification of two- and three-parameter simple height-diameter models for birch in the European part of Russia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(9), pages 375-382.
    15. Zida Song & Quan Liu & Zhigen Hu, 2020. "Decision-Making Framework, Enhanced by Mutual Inspection for First-Stage Dam Construction Diversion Scheme Selection," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(2), pages 563-577, January.
    16. Hunt, Allen G. & Faybishenko, Boris & Powell, Thomas L., 2020. "A new phenomenological model to describe root-soil interactions based on percolation theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 433(C).
    17. Tingyu Zhang & Quan Fu & Hao Wang & Fangfang Liu & Huanyuan Wang & Ling Han, 2022. "Bagging-based machine learning algorithms for landslide susceptibility modeling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 823-846, January.
    18. Confalonieri, R. & Bregaglio, S. & Acutis, M., 2012. "Quantifying plasticity in simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 159-166.
    19. Huseyin Ozturk & Ersin Namli & Halil Ibrahim Erdal, 2016. "Reducing Overreliance on Sovereign Credit Ratings: Which Model Serves Better?," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 59-81, June.
    20. Hongzhang Xu & Jamie Pittock & Katherine A. Daniell, 2021. "China: A New Trajectory Prioritizing Rural Rather Than Urban Development?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-29, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3013-:d:764386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.