IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2850-d761594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Digital Inequality on the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from European Union Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Borda

    (Department of Insurance, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Natalia Grishchenko

    (Institute of Social Policy, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 101000 Moscow, Russia)

  • Patrycja Kowalczyk-Rólczyńska

    (Department of Insurance, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53345 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

One of the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic is the relationship between social distancing measures and increased use of the Internet, electronic services, and digital devices. How does digital inequality in the context of social distancing affect the COVID-19 pandemic? In this article, we assessed the impact of existing digital inequality as the cause of the changing number of cases of COVID-19 in the EU. We assessed the relationship between the increase in COVID-19 cases between the first and second waves in 2020 and the presence of digital inequality in Internet use and digital skills across sociodemographic factors: gender, age, education, generation, marital status, and place of residence. We applied the ordinary least squares method to data from the 2019 Eurobarometer survey, which reveals the digital maturity of EU citizens, and from the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control in 2020, which tracks COVID-19 cases. We found that the strongest relationship between the number of COVID-19 cases and digital inequality is related to Internet use rather than digital skills. The digital divide by age, between generations, and the geographic digital divide in Internet use show a strong positive relationship with the changing incidence of COVID-19 cases. The gender digital gap shows a negative relationship for both Internet use and digital skills, indicating the social role of women in households in the pandemic, caring for children and the elderly. A negative relation was also found in digital inequality by marital status for digital skills, which reflects preferences regarding living alone during the pandemic. These findings prove the importance of universal access to the Internet for older people and those living in rural areas. The results can contribute to policies aimed at reducing digital inequalities in the face of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Borda & Natalia Grishchenko & Patrycja Kowalczyk-Rólczyńska, 2022. "Impact of Digital Inequality on the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2850-:d:761594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2850/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2850/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anjalika Nande & Ben Adlam & Justin Sheen & Michael Z Levy & Alison L Hill, 2021. "Dynamics of COVID-19 under social distancing measures are driven by transmission network structure," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Trisha Bakshi & Asmita Bhattacharyya, 2021. "Socially Distanced or Socially Connected? Well-being through ICT Usage among the Indian Elderly during COVID-19," Millennial Asia, , vol. 12(2), pages 190-208, August.
    3. Sanchez-Diaz, Ivan & Altuntas Vural, Ceren & Halldórsson, Árni, 2021. "Assessing the inequalities in access to online delivery services and the way COVID-19 pandemic affects marginalization," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 24-36.
    4. Ayoung Suh & Mengjun Li, 2021. "Digital Tracing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: User Appraisal, Emotion, and Continuance Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Marta Kuc-Czarnecka, 2020. "COVID-19 and digital deprivation in Poland," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 11(3), pages 415-431, September.
    6. Raghu Raman & Krishnashree Achuthan & Ricardo Vinuesa & Prema Nedungadi, 2021. "COVIDTAS COVID-19 Tracing App Scale—An Evaluation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Hilbert, Martin, 2016. "The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 567-581.
    8. Grishchenko, Natalia, 2020. "The gap not only closes: Resistance and reverse shifts in the digital divide in Russia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8).
    9. Katz, Raúl & Jung, Juan & Callorda, Fernando, 2020. "Can digitization mitigate the economic damage of a pandemic? Evidence from SARS," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10).
    10. Rajeev K. Goel & Michael A. Nelson, 2021. "COVID-19 internet vaccination information and vaccine administration: evidence from the United States," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 45(4), pages 716-734, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hayet Kerras & Susana Bautista & Danilo Santos Piñeros Perea & María Dolores de-Miguel Gómez, 2022. "Closing the Digital Gender Gap among Foreign University Students: The Challenges Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Long, Trinh Quang & Hoang, Trang Cam & Simkins, Betty, 2023. "Gender gap in digital literacy across generations: Evidence from Indonesia," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PD).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serrecchia, Michela, 2024. "Analysis of Internet development and internal digital divide by using the “.it” domain names as an indicator: Evidence from Italy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    2. Vitor Miguel Ribeiro & Lei Bao, 2021. "Impact of next‐generation access networks on the innovation efficiency of Portuguese municipalities: A spatial econometrics approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 1615-1637, October.
    3. Karelin, Iliya & Kapelyuk, Sergey, 2023. "Digital Skills of Russian Citizens: Regional Differences," MPRA Paper 119494, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Jun Wen & Hadi Hussain & Renai Jiang & Junaid Waheed, 2023. "Overcoming the Digital Divide With ICT Diffusion: Multivariate and Spatial Analysis at China’s Provincial Level," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    5. Gupta, Monik & Velaga, Nagendra R. & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2024. "Understanding risky driving among motorized two-wheeler drivers: The role of time-related anxiety and impunctuality," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 199-210.
    6. Shaifali Chauhan & Richa Banerjee & Vishal Dagar, 2023. "Analysis of Impulse Buying Behaviour of Consumer During COVID-19: An Empirical Study," Millennial Asia, , vol. 14(2), pages 278-299, June.
    7. Wei Yang & Le Wang & Xian Zhang, 2025. "Online or not online: the impact of business owner’s risk preference on the adoption of e-business," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1375-1394, June.
    8. Sofia Amaral‐Garcia & Mattia Nardotto & Carol Propper & Tommaso Valletti, 2024. "Information and vaccine hesitancy: The role of broadband Internet," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(9), pages 1936-1948, September.
    9. repec:rza:wpaper:893 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Vergara Cobos,Estefania Belen & Malasquez Carbonel,Eduardo Alonso, 2023. "Growth and Transformative Effects of ICT Adoption : A Survey," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10352, The World Bank.
    11. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Krämer, Jan & Palan, Nicole, 2024. "Socioeconomic benefits of high-speed broadband availability and service adoption: A survey," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7).
    12. Liu, Chun & Wang, Lian, 2021. "Who is left behind? Exploring the characteristics of China's broadband non-adopting families," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9).
    13. Holden, Stein T. & Tilahun, Mesfin, 2021. "Mobile phones, leadership and gender in rural business groups," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    14. Jongmin Lee & Seok-Min Lee & Eunok Jung, 2021. "How Important Is Behavioral Change during the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Mathematical Modeling Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-12, September.
    15. Emara, Noha & Zhang, Yuanhao, 2021. "The non-linear impact of digitization on remittances inflow: Evidence from the BRICS," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4).
    16. Lili Li & Araz Taeihagh & Si Ying Tan, 2023. "A scoping review of the impacts of COVID-19 physical distancing measures on vulnerable population groups," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Philip Chen & Edward J Oughton & Pete Tyler & Mo Jia & Jakub Zagdanski, 2020. "Evaluating the impact of next generation broadband on local business creation," Papers 2010.14113, arXiv.org.
    18. Baichang Zhong & Fenghui Zhu & Liying Xia, 2021. "Is There a Digital Divide Between Urban Students and Migrant Students in China?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    19. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Reimers, Hanna, 2022. "Carbon footprint tracking apps. What drives consumers' adoption intention?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Gijón, Covadonga & Fernández-Bonilla, Fernando & Ruíz-Rúa, Aurora, 2025. "Different approaches to Spanish e-government: From use to impact," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    21. Zhang, Qianxiao & Shah, Syed Ale Raza & Yang, Ling, 2022. "An Appreciated Response of Disaggregated Energies Consumption towards the Sustainable Growth: A debate on G-10 Economies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2850-:d:761594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.