IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2735-d758973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Machine Learning to Predict Visitors to Totally Protected Areas in Sarawak, Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Abang Zainoren Abang Abdurahman

    (Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Sarawak, Kota Samarahan 94300, Sarawak, Malaysia)

  • Wan Fairos Wan Yaacob

    (Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kelantan, Kampus Kota Bharu, Lembah Sireh, Kota Bharu 15050, Kelantan, Malaysia
    Institute for Big Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (IBDAAI), Kompleks Al-Khawarizmi, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Syerina Azlin Md Nasir

    (Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kelantan, Kampus Kota Bharu, Lembah Sireh, Kota Bharu 15050, Kelantan, Malaysia)

  • Serah Jaya

    (Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Sarawak, Kota Samarahan 94300, Sarawak, Malaysia)

  • Suhaili Mokhtar

    (Sarawak Forestry Corporation, Jalan Sungai Tapang, Kota Sentosa, Kuching 93250, Sarawak, Malaysia)

Abstract

The machine learning approach has been widely used in many areas of studies, including the tourism sector. It can offer powerful estimation for prediction. With a growing number of tourism activities, there is a need to predict tourists’ classification for monitoring, decision making, and planning formulation. This paper aims to predict visitors to totally protected areas in Sarawak using machine learning techniques. The prediction model developed would be able to identify significant factors affecting local and foreign visitors to these areas. Several machine learning techniques such as k-NN, Naive Bayes, and Decision Tree were used to predict whether local and foreign visitors’ arrival was high, medium, or low to these totally protected areas in Sarawak, Malaysia. The data of local and foreign visitors’ arrival to eighteen totally protected areas covering national parks, nature reserves, and wildlife centers in Sarawak, Malaysia, from 2015 to 2019 were used in this study. Variables such as the age of the park, distance from the nearest city, types of the park, recreation services availability, natural characteristics availability, and types of connectivity were used in the model. Based on the accuracy measure, precision, and recall, results show Decision Tree (Gain Ratio) exhibited the best prediction performance for both local visitors (accuracy = 80.65) and foreign visitors (accuracy = 84.35%). Distance to the nearest city and size of the park were found to be the most important predictors in predicting the local tourist visitors’ park classification, while for foreign visitors, age, type of park, and the natural characteristics availability were the significant predictors in predicting the foreign tourist visitors’ parks classification. This study exemplifies that machine learning has respectable potential for the prediction of visitors’ data. Future research should consider bagging and boosting algorithms to develop a visitors’ prediction model.

Suggested Citation

  • Abang Zainoren Abang Abdurahman & Wan Fairos Wan Yaacob & Syerina Azlin Md Nasir & Serah Jaya & Suhaili Mokhtar, 2022. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Visitors to Totally Protected Areas in Sarawak, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2735-:d:758973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2735/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2735/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arjan S. Gosal & Janine A. McMahon & Katharine M. Bowgen & Catherine H. Hoppe & Guy Ziv, 2021. "Identifying and Mapping Groups of Protected Area Visitors by Environmental Awareness," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Gabriela Mordecki, 2014. "Determinants of Argentinean tourism demand in Uruguay," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 14-17, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    3. Mark Groulx & Christopher J. Lemieux & John L. Lewis & Sarah Brown, 2017. "Understanding consumer behaviour and adaptation planning responses to climate-driven environmental change in Canada's parks and protected areas: a climate futurescapes approach," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(6), pages 1016-1035, June.
    4. Dong Zhao & Chunyu Huang & Yan Wei & Fanhua Yu & Mingjing Wang & Huiling Chen, 2017. "An Effective Computational Model for Bankruptcy Prediction Using Kernel Extreme Learning Machine Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 49(2), pages 325-341, February.
    5. Keqing Li & Wenxing Lu & Changyong Liang & Binyou Wang, 2019. "Intelligence in Tourism Management: A Hybrid FOA-BP Method on Daily Tourism Demand Forecasting with Web Search Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Abang Zainoren Abang Abdurahman & Syerina Azlin Md Nasir & Wan Fairos Wan Yaacob & Serah Jaya & Suhaili Mokhtar, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Clustering of Sarawak Malaysia Total Protected Area Visitors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anica-Popa Liana-Elena & Vrîncianu Marinela & Petrică Papuc Iuliana-Mădălina, 2023. "AI – powered Business Services in the Hyperautomation Era," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1036-1050, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Duglio & Alessandro Bonadonna & Marilisa Letey & Giovanni Peira & Laura Zavattaro & Giampiero Lombardi, 2019. "Tourism Development in Inner Mountain Areas—The Local Stakeholders’ Point of View through a Mixed Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Johan Eklund & Nadine Levratto & Giovanni B. Ramello, 2020. "Entrepreneurship and failure: two sides of the same coin?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 373-382, February.
    3. repec:ctc:sdimse:dime21_01 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Abbas Haider & Hui Wang & Bryan Scotney & Glenn Hawe, 2022. "Predictive Market Making via Machine Learning," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Veganzones, David & Séverin, Eric & Chlibi, Souhir, 2023. "Influence of earnings management on forecasting corporate failure," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 123-143.
    6. Misankova Maria & Zvarikova Katarina & Kliestikova Jana, 2017. "Bankruptcy Practice in Countries of Visegrad Four," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 108-118, June.
    7. Xiangxing Tao & Mingxin Wang & Yanting Ji, 2023. "The Application of Graph-Structured Cox Model in Financial Risk Early Warning of Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Alessandro Bonadonna & Chiara Giachino & Elisa Truant, 2017. "Sustainability and Mountain Tourism: The Millennial’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Juan F. Beltrán & John A. Litvaitis & Pedro Abellán, 2022. "Seeking Sustainable Solutions in a Time of Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-2, June.
    10. Jian-Wu Bi & Tian-Yu Han & Yanbo Yao, 2024. "Collaborative forecasting of tourism demand for multiple tourist attractions with spatial dependence: A combined deep learning model," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(2), pages 361-388, March.
    11. Doering, Jana & Kizys, Renatas & Juan, Angel A. & Fitó, Àngels & Polat, Onur, 2019. "Metaheuristics for rich portfolio optimisation and risk management: Current state and future trends," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    12. Chidiebere Ofoegbu & Heiko Balzter & Martin Phillips, 2023. "Evidence Synthesis towards a Holistic Landscape Decision Framework: Insight from the Landscape Decisions Programme," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Haodong Sun & Yang Yang & Yanyan Chen & Xiaoming Liu & Jiachen Wang, 2023. "Tourism demand forecasting of multi-attractions with spatiotemporal grid: a convolutional block attention module model," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 205-233, June.
    14. Kalliopi Kanaki & Michail Kalogiannakis & Emmanouil Poulakis & Panagiotis Politis, 2022. "Investigating the Association between Algorithmic Thinking and Performance in Environmental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Vicente García & Ana I. Marqués & J. Salvador Sánchez & Humberto J. Ochoa-Domínguez, 2019. "Dissimilarity-Based Linear Models for Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 1019-1031, March.
    16. Matthew Smith & Francisco Alvarez, 2022. "Predicting Firm-Level Bankruptcy in the Spanish Economy Using Extreme Gradient Boosting," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 263-295, January.
    17. Chen, Jian & Katchova, Ani L. & Zhou, Chenxi, 2021. "Agricultural loan delinquency prediction using machine learning methods," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(5), May.
    18. Sami Ben Jabeur & Nicolae Stef & Pedro Carmona, 2023. "Bankruptcy Prediction using the XGBoost Algorithm and Variable Importance Feature Engineering," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 715-741, February.
    19. Marko Špiler & Tijana Matejić & Snežana Knežević & Marko Milašinović & Aleksandra Mitrović & Vesna Bogojević Arsić & Tijana Obradović & Dragoljub Simonović & Vukašin Despotović & Stefan Milojević & Mi, 2022. "Assessment of the Bankruptcy Risk in the Hotel Industry as a Condition of the COVID-19 Crisis Using Time-Delay Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-54, December.
    20. Philippe Jardin & David Veganzones & Eric Séverin, 2019. "Forecasting Corporate Bankruptcy Using Accrual-Based Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 7-43, June.
    21. Johannes Welling & Þorvarður Árnason & Rannveig Ólafsdóttir, 2020. "Implications of Climate Change on Nature-Based Tourism Demand: A Segmentation Analysis of Glacier Site Visitors in Southeast Iceland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2735-:d:758973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.