IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p1968-d745463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Olympic Waterfronts: An Evaluation of Wasted Opportunities and Lasting Legacies

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Janela Pinto

    (Centre for Innovation in Territory, Urbanism and Architecture (CiTUA), Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Gustavo Lopes dos Santos

    (Centre for Innovation in Territory, Urbanism and Architecture (CiTUA), Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

Mega-events such as the Olympic Games are powerful tools for city-branding and urban development, carrying the ability to create lasting physical, political, social, and economic legacies. Waterfront redevelopment has become a primary mechanism for revitalizing urban spaces, especially through brownfield requalification, and the Olympics have not been indifferent to this trend. Several recent editions have engaged in the rehabilitation of urban waterfronts. To analyze common mistakes that may impair the quality of these interventions, we apply a revised version of a binary evaluation tool to nine such Olympic Waterfronts, starting with Barcelona 1992, assessing their contexts, budgets, programs, plans, and environmental integration. The results show that the Olympic Waterfront can drastically change the image of the city, greatly contributing to the perceived success of the event’s legacy and creating new urban centralities. However, the inadequate management in the planning, delivery and, especially, legacy stages of the event can compromise this “Olympic Effect”. The test application of the evaluation tool proved successful in the context of mega-event planning and post-event transformation. It could potentially be useful in informing present and future decision-making regarding waterfront regeneration projects by highlighting pressure-points that, if not addressed, may hinder the future success of the interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Janela Pinto & Gustavo Lopes dos Santos, 2022. "Olympic Waterfronts: An Evaluation of Wasted Opportunities and Lasting Legacies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:1968-:d:745463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/1968/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/1968/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Kassens-Noor, 2016. "From Ephemeral Planning to Permanent Urbanism: An Urban Planning Theory of Mega-Events," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(1), pages 41-54.
    2. Martin Müller & Sven Daniel Wolfe & Christopher Gaffney & David Gogishvili & Miriam Hug & Annick Leick, 2021. "An evaluation of the sustainability of the Olympic Games," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 340-348, April.
    3. Pedro Janela Pinto & G. Mathias Kondolf, 2020. "The Fit of Urban Waterfront Interventions: Matters of Size, Money and Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Glen Searle, 2002. "Uncertain Legacy: Sydney's Olympic Stadiums," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(7), pages 845-860, October.
    5. Penny Bernstock, 2020. "Evaluating the contribution of planning gain to an inclusive housing legacy: a case study of London 2012," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 927-953, November.
    6. Maria-Dolors Garcia-Ramon & Abel Albet, 2000. "Pre-Olympic and Post-Olympic Barcelona, a ‘Model’ for Urban Regeneration Today?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(8), pages 1331-1334, August.
    7. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Daniel Lunn, 2021. "Regression to the tail: Why the Olympics blow up," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 233-260, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sven Daniel Wolfe, 2023. "Building a better host city? Reforming and contesting the Olympics in Paris 2024," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(2), pages 257-273, March.
    2. Byers, Terri & Hayday, Emily & Pappous, Athanasios (Sakis), 2020. "A new conceptualization of mega sports event legacy delivery: Wicked problems and critical realist solution," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 171-182.
    3. Mark Davidson & Donald McNeill, 2012. "The Redevelopment of Olympic Sites: Examining the Legacy of Sydney Olympic Park," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(8), pages 1625-1641, June.
    4. Steven Henderson, 2012. "An Evaluation of the Layering and Legacy of Area-based Regeneration Initiatives in England: The Case of Wolverhampton," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(6), pages 1201-1227, May.
    5. Carl Singleton & J. James Reade & Johan Rewilak & Dominik Schreyer, 2021. "How big is home advantage at the Olympic Games?," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2021-13, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    6. J. James Reade, 2023. "Large Sporting Events and Public Health and Safety," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2023-04, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    7. Ji Wu & Madeleine Orr & Kurumi Aizawa & Yuhei Inoue, 2021. "Language Relativity in Legacy Literature: A Systematic Review in Multiple Languages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Christian Dragin-Jensen, 2016. "Mutual Image Impacts of Events and Host Destinations: What We Know From Prior Research," Working Papers 122/16, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Sociology, Environmental and Business Economics.
    9. Gustavo Lopes dos Santos & Rosário Macário & Marie Delaplace & Stefano Di Vita, 2022. "The Long-Standing Issue of Mobility at the Olympics: From Host Cities to Host Regions in the Ongoing Case Study of Milan–Cortina 2026," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Jieheerah Yun, 2022. "The Han River Development: Planning the Riverfront as Seoul’s Natural Landmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Marcelia Castro Cardoso & Helionora da Silva Alves & Izaura Cristina Nunes Pereira Costa & Thiago Almeida Vieira, 2021. "Anthropogenic Actions and Socioenvironmental Changes in Lake of Juá, Brazilian Amazonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Eduardo Medeiros & Ana Brandão & Paulo Tormenta Pinto & Sara Silva Lopes, 2021. "Urban Planning Policies to the Renewal of Riverfront Areas: The Lisbon Metropolis Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Larissa E Davies, 2011. "Using sports infrastructure to deliver economic and social change: Lessons for London beyond 2012," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 26(4), pages 227-231, June.
    14. Krystian M. Zawadzki & Marcin Potrykus, 2023. "Stock Markets’ Reactions to the Announcement of the Hosts. An Event Study in the Analysis of Large Sporting Events in the Years 1976–2032," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 24(6), pages 759-800, August.
    15. Vargas Vanesa Mădălina & Niţă Sorin & Marin Aurel & Joga Florentina Ecaterina & Stoica Mihaela-Ionica, 2022. "Greening: politics and economics for social auditing. Sport management as common denominator," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 575-583, August.
    16. Alex W. Grebenar, 2024. "Building the Virtual Dancefloor: Delivering and Experiencing House Music Events in the Time of COVID-19," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Kassens-Noor, Eva, 2019. "Transportation planning and policy in the pursuit of mega-events: Boston's 2024 Olympic bid," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 239-245.
    18. Heike C. Alberts, 2009. "Berlin's Failed Bid to Host the 2000 Summer Olympic Games: Urban Development and the Improvement of Sports Facilities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 502-516, June.
    19. Eiji Yamamura, 2021. "Do You Want Sustainable Olympics? Environment, Disaster, Gender, and the 2020 Tokyo Olympics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Josh Matti & Yang Zhou, 2022. "United we feel stronger? On the Olympics and political ideology," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 271-300, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:1968-:d:745463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.