IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v6y2021i1p133-145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Scholars Communicate the ‘Temporary Turn’ in Urban Studies? A Socio-Semiotic Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Robin A. Chang

    (Department of European Planning Cultures, School of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund, Germany)

Abstract

Interdisciplinarity broadens urban planning praxis and simultaneously deepens how urban research unfurls. Indeed, this breadth and depth diverges and converges the understanding of current and popular concepts such as temporary use (TU)—also recognized as short-term or temporally undefined use of space. Through a meta-research, or research about research approach employing socio-semiotics and bibliometric analyses for the first time in relation to TU, I clarify the increasing scholarly attention to urban interventions by asking: How are urban scholars communicating the TU discourse? A socio-semiotic framework helps unpack the production of meanings as well as symbols channeled through the scholarly institutionalization of TU. Supporting this, I use bibliometric analyses to explicate the production and reproduction of meaning through keywords and citation networks in research literature. This study illuminates epistemological activities and reflects on directions tied to our understanding and articulation of a potential ‘Temporary Turn’ in theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin A. Chang, 2021. "How Do Scholars Communicate the ‘Temporary Turn’ in Urban Studies? A Socio-Semiotic Framework," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 133-145.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:133-145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3613
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    2. Eva Kassens-Noor, 2016. "From Ephemeral Planning to Permanent Urbanism: An Urban Planning Theory of Mega-Events," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(1), pages 41-54.
    3. Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver & Gregorio Gonzalez & Pedro Caja & Francisca Sempere-Ripoll, 2015. "Clusters and Industrial Districts: Where is the Literature Going? Identifying Emerging Sub-Fields of Research," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1827-1872, September.
    4. Lauren Andres & Oleg Golubchikov, 2016. "The Limits to Artist-Led Regeneration: Creative Brownfields in the Cities of High Culture," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 757-775, July.
    5. Thomas Honeck, 2017. "From squatters to creatives. An innovation perspective on temporary use in planning," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 268-287, April.
    6. Armelle Tardiveau & Daniel Mallo, 2014. "Unpacking and Challenging Habitus: An Approach to Temporary Urbanism as a Socially Engaged Practice," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 456-472, August.
    7. Sara Meerow & Joshua P. Newell, 2015. "Resilience and Complexity: A Bibliometric Review and Prospects for Industrial Ecology," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(2), pages 236-251, April.
    8. Ryan Centner, 2012. "Microcitizenships: Fractious Forms of Urban Belonging after Argentine Neoliberalism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 336-362, March.
    9. Krzysztof Herman & Maria Rodgers, 2020. "From Tactical Urbanism Action to Institutionalised Urban Planning and Educational Tool: The Evolution of Park(ing) Day," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Massimo Aria & Michelangelo Misuraca & Maria Spano, 2020. "Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 803-831, June.
    11. Daniela Patti & Levente Polyak, 2015. "From practice to policy: frameworks for temporary use," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 122-134, March.
    12. Kurt Iveson, 2013. "Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 941-956, May.
    13. Michael Martin & Stephen Hincks & Iain Deas, 2020. "Temporary use in England’s core cities: Looking beyond the exceptional," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3381-3401, December.
    14. Michael Martin & Iain Deas & Stephen Hincks, 2019. "The Role of Temporary Use in Urban Regeneration: Ordinary and Extraordinary Approaches in Bristol and Liverpool," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 537-557, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas W. Sanchez, 2021. "Innovations and Development in Urban Planning Scholarship and Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 89-92.
    2. Bruce Stiftel, 2021. "Are We Kidding Ourselves That Research Leads Practice?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 154-155.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johnson Ankrah & Ana Monteiro & Helena Madureira, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Data Sources and Tools for Shoreline Change Analysis and Detection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Juan F. Prados-Castillo & Miguel Ángel Solano-Sánchez & Pilar Guaita Fernández & José Manuel Guaita Martínez, 2023. "Potential of the Crypto Economy in Financial Management and Fundraising for Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. María Isabel Guerrero Molina & Juan Felipe Salazar Acevedo & Julián Taborda Giraldo, 2022. "Reflexiones sobre el Brexit y la migración: revisión de literatura," Apuntes del Cenes, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, vol. 41(74), pages 111-139, July.
    4. Evgenia Anastasiou & Stella Manika & Konstantina Ragazou & Ioannis Katsios, 2021. "Territorial and Human Geography Challenges: How Can Smart Villages Support Rural Development and Population Inclusion?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Singh, Bharati, 2021. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Behavioral Finance and Behavioral Accounting," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 24(2), pages 198-230, November.
    6. Hugo Palácios & Helena de Almeida & Maria José Sousa, 2021. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Service Climate as a Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Hospitality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-27, November.
    7. Omolola M. Adisa & Muthoni Masinde & Joel O. Botai & Christina M. Botai, 2020. "Bibliometric Analysis of Methods and Tools for Drought Monitoring and Prediction in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Massimo Aria & Corrado Cuccurullo & Luca D’Aniello & Michelangelo Misuraca & Maria Spano, 2022. "Thematic Analysis as a New Culturomic Tool: The Social Media Coverage on COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Toshiyuki Hasumi & Mei-Shiu Chiu, 2022. "Online mathematics education as bio-eco-techno process: bibliometric analysis using co-authorship and bibliographic coupling," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4631-4654, August.
    10. Belfiore, Alessandra & Cuccurullo, Corrado & Aria, Massimo, 2022. "IoT in healthcare: A scientometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Lingjie Tang & Chang’an Zhang, 2023. "Global Research on International Students’ Intercultural Adaptation in a Foreign Context: A Visualized Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Landscape," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    12. Büşra Ayan & Elif Güner & Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-39, December.
    13. Windemer, Rebecca, 2019. "Considering time in land use planning: An assessment of end-of-life decision making for commercially managed onshore wind schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    14. Eunhye Park & Woo-Hyuk Kim, 2022. "A Retrospective Literature Review of Eating Disorder Research (1990–2021): Application of Bibliometrics and Topical Trends," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2021. "What Do We Know about Co-Working Spaces? Trends and Challenges Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    16. Yanjun Gao & Su Luan Wong & Mas Nida Md. Khambari & Nooreen bt Noordin & Jingxin Geng, 2022. "Sustaining E-Learning Studies in Higher Education: An Examination of Scientific Productions in Scopus between 2019 and 2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Lopreite, Milena & Misuraca, Michelangelo & Puliga, Michelangelo, 2023. "An analysis of the thematic evolution of ageing and healthcare expenditure using word embedding: A scoping review of policy implications," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    18. Qin, Yong & Xu, Zeshui & Wang, Xinxin & Škare, Marinko, 2022. "Green energy adoption and its determinants: A bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    19. Habiba Halepoto & Tao Gong & Hafeezullah Memon, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Antibacterial Textiles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Marcel R. Sieber & Milan Malý & Radek Liška, 2022. "Conceptualizing organizational culture and business-IT alignment: a systematic literature review," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:133-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.