IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p910-d724459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Long-Standing Issue of Mobility at the Olympics: From Host Cities to Host Regions in the Ongoing Case Study of Milan–Cortina 2026

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Lopes dos Santos

    (Centre for Innovation in Territory, Urbanism and Architecture (CiTUA), Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Rosário Macário

    (Civil Engineering Research and Innovation for Sustainability (CERIS), Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
    Department of Transport and Regional Economics (TPR), Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Antwerp, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Marie Delaplace

    (Lab’Urba-EUP, Université Gustave Eiffel—Université Paris-Est, 77420 Champs sur Marne, France)

  • Stefano Di Vita

    (Dipartimento di Architettura e Studi Urbani, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Due to public opposition against the unsustainability of hosting the Olympic Games, the International Olympic Committee adopted Olympic Agenda 2020 to adjust the event requirements to address modern society’s sustainability concerns. Since its implementation, the Agenda has driven important changes regarding the planning and organization of the Olympics, including the possibility of regions being hosts. This allows the sprawl of Olympic venues over larger territories, theoretically facilitating the alignment of event requirements with the needs of the intensively growing contemporary urban areas. However, the larger the host territory, the more complex becomes its mobility planning, as transport requirements for participants still have to be fulfilled, and the host populations still expect to inherit benefits from any investments made. The objective of this paper is to identify and discuss new challenges that such modifications bring for mega-event mobility planning. First, based on the academic literature of case studies of previous Olympic cities, a theoretical framework to systematize the mobility problem at the Olympic Games is proposed for further validation, identifying the dimensions of the related knowledge frames. Second, the mobility planning for the case study of the first ever Olympic region—the Milan–Cortina 2026 Winter Games—is described. Using this case study, the proposed framework is then extrapolated for cases of Olympic regions in order to identify any shifts in the paradigm of mobility planning when increasing the spatial scale of Olympic hosts. Conclusions indicate that, if properly addressed, unsustainability might be mitigated in Olympic regions, but mega-event planners will have to consider new issues affecting host communities and event stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Lopes dos Santos & Rosário Macário & Marie Delaplace & Stefano Di Vita, 2022. "The Long-Standing Issue of Mobility at the Olympics: From Host Cities to Host Regions in the Ongoing Case Study of Milan–Cortina 2026," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:910-:d:724459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/910/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/910/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Daniel Lunn, 2021. "Regression to the tail: Why the Olympics blow up," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 233-260, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sven Daniel Wolfe, 2023. "Building a better host city? Reforming and contesting the Olympics in Paris 2024," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(2), pages 257-273, March.
    2. Carl Singleton & J. James Reade & Johan Rewilak & Dominik Schreyer, 2021. "How big is home advantage at the Olympic Games?," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2021-13, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    3. Eiji Yamamura, 2021. "Do You Want Sustainable Olympics? Environment, Disaster, Gender, and the 2020 Tokyo Olympics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Josh Matti & Yang Zhou, 2022. "United we feel stronger? On the Olympics and political ideology," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 271-300, December.
    5. Bent Flyvbjerg, 2021. "Four Ways to Scale Up: Smart, Dumb, Forced, and Fumbled," Papers 2101.11104, arXiv.org.
    6. Nabin Sapkota & Atsuo Murata & Waldemar Karwowski & Mohammad Reza Davahli & Krzysztof Fiok & Awad M. Aljuaid & Tadeusz Marek & Tareq Ahram, 2022. "The Chaotic Behavior of the Spread of Infection during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Pedro Janela Pinto & Gustavo Lopes dos Santos, 2022. "Olympic Waterfronts: An Evaluation of Wasted Opportunities and Lasting Legacies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-32, February.
    8. Kathleen Rodenburg & Louise Hayes & Lianne Foti & Ann Pegoraro, 2021. "Responsible Leadership in Sport: An Ethical Dilemma," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:910-:d:724459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.