IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p595-d718813.html

Improving Education for Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Chinese Technical Universities: A Quest for Building a Sustainable Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Min Lv

    (School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Changzhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou 213032, China)

  • Hong Zhang

    (School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Changzhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou 213032, China)

  • Paul Georgescu

    (Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Iaşi, Bd. Copou 11A, 700506 Iaşi, Romania)

  • Tan Li

    (School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Changzhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou 213032, China)

  • Bing Zhang

    (School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Changzhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou 213032, China)

Abstract

The global economic trends and the winds of technological change have elevated the status of integration between industry and education for innovation and entrepreneurship to that of being a national strategic priority of China. However, for a long time prior to that, the many differences between the industrial and educational systems have caused a rift between education for innovation and entrepreneurship and professional education, a profound disconnection between professional education and the local industries, and the subsequent disinterest of entrepreneurial mentors. In this paper, we analyze the status of education for innovation and entrepreneurship in Chinese technical universities. It is pointed out that technical universities should deepen the integration between the industry and education for innovation and entrepreneurship in order to mitigate the imbalance between the supply side of the higher education talent training and the demand side of industrial development. It is also argued that technical universities should change their talent training paradigm, which includes a makeover of the organizational structure and of the curricular system, as well as make amends in the innovation ecosystem with respect to the organization of incubation platforms and of teacher–student teams, in order to promote national and regional economic development, as well as social progress. A method to evaluate the performance of the education for innovation and entrepreneurship in Chinese technical universities, based on specific performance indicators including patents filled, publications, awards in competitions, and acquired funding and on certain non-specific ones including organizational arrangements and satisfaction rates, is presented and then applied to the specific case of the Changzhou Institute of Technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Lv & Hong Zhang & Paul Georgescu & Tan Li & Bing Zhang, 2022. "Improving Education for Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Chinese Technical Universities: A Quest for Building a Sustainable Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:595-:d:718813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/595/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/595/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ankrah, Samuel & AL-Tabbaa, Omar, 2015. "Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 387-408.
    2. Gernot Hutschenreiter & Gang Zhang, 2007. "China’s Quest for Innovation-Driven Growth—The Policy Dimension," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 245-254, December.
    3. Song, Yang & Sahut, Jean-Michel & Zhang, Zhiyuan & Tian, Yifan & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2022. "The effects of government subsidies on the sustainable innovation of university-industry collaboration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammed Alzoraiki & Abd Rahman Ahmad & Ali Ahmed Ateeq & Gehad Mohammed Ahmed Naji & Qais Almaamari & Baligh Ali Hasan Beshr, 2023. "Impact of Teachers’ Commitment to the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Sustainable Teaching Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Sun, Hongduo & Shang, Hongyun, 2025. "Cultural intensity, financial openness, with regional innovation and entrepreneurship development," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PC).
    3. Xiaoqi Kong & Qinghua Zeng & Xingfeng Guo & Feng Kong, 2024. "Sustainable Cultivation of Discipline Competition Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education: An Example of the Food Science and Engineering Major," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Yang Zhang & Ziyu Hu, 2025. "Research on Grade Point Innovation and Grade Point Average Based on Deep Learning Networks and Evolutionary Algorithms for College Innovation Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yucai Jia & Xiaohu Zhou & Guiyang Zhang & Yue Sui & Lixin Li, 2026. "Differential Game Analysis of University-Enterprise Co-innovation in General Purpose Technologies Innovation Based on Resource Complementation and Collaborative R&D," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 68(2), pages 1557-1599, August.
    2. Marius Băban & Călin Florin Băban & Tudor Mitran, 2023. "Universities as an External Knowledge Source for Industry: Investigating the Antecedents’ Impact on the Importance Perception of Their Collaboration in Open Innovation Using an Ordinal Regression-Neural Network Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Xiaofeng Xu & Xiangyu Chen & Yi Xu & Tao Wang & Yifan Zhang, 2022. "Improving the Innovative Performance of Renewable Energy Enterprises in China: Effects of Subsidy Policy and Intellectual Property Legislation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Aaron Kaegi & Cornelia Storz & Tobias ten Brink & Na Zou, 2025. "Web mining science–industry linkages: extending typologies and rethinking knowledge transfer," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(12), pages 6909-6948, December.
    5. Ma Siyi & Nik Muhammad Hanis Bin Nek Rakami & Shi Haochen & Shi Xinwen, 2026. "Mapping the Knowledge Structure of University-Industry-Research Collaboration and Its Implications for Student Learning Outcomes: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(6), pages 2339-2356, June.
    6. Jiang, Renai & Jefferson, Gary H. & Zucker, Sam & Li, Lintong, 2019. "The role of research and ownership collaboration in generating patent quality: China-U.S comparisons," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Niels Stijn & Frank J. Rijnsoever & Martine Veelen, 2018. "Exploring the motives and practices of university–start-up interaction: evidence from Route 128," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 674-713, June.
    8. Adele Parmentola & Marco Ferretti & Eva Panetti, 0. "Exploring the university-industry cooperation in a low innovative region. What differences between low tech and high tech industries?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-28.
    9. Anita Mendiratta & Shveta Singh & Surendra Singh Yadav & Arvind Mahajan, 2023. "Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis of Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 319-339, September.
    10. Natalia Budyldina, 2018. "Entrepreneurial universities and regional contribution," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 265-277, June.
    11. Jasmine Jain & Tay Pei Lin & Johan Eddy Luaran, 2026. "From Campus to Community: Embedding Purpose-Driven Learning in Pre-Service Stem Education through A Refugee-School Partnership," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(1), pages 2083-2091, January.
    12. Woodfield, Paul J. & Ooi, Yat Ming & Husted, Kenneth, 2023. "Commercialisation patterns of scientific knowledge in traditional low- and medium-tech industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Cui, Weijun & Li, Lu & Chen, Guang, 2022. "Market-value oriented or technology-value oriented? ——Location impacts of industry-university-research (IUR) cooperation bases on innovation performance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Călin Florin Băban & Marius Băban & Adalberto Rangone, 2022. "Outcomes of Industry–University Collaboration in Open Innovation: An Exploratory Investigation of Their Antecedents’ Impact Based on a PLS-SEM and Soft Computing Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, March.
    15. McCabe, Angela & Parker, Rachel & Osegowitsch, Tom & Cox, Stephen, 2023. "Overcoming barriers to knowledge co-production in academic–practitioner research collaboration," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 212-222.
    16. Amalya L. Oliver, 2022. "Holistic ecosystems for enhancing innovative collaborations in university–industry consortia," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 1612-1628, October.
    17. Irina Ervits, 2024. "Developing indicators for the social benefits of university-industry collaborations," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Sun, Jinghong & Liu, Xuefeng & Cai, Jing, 2025. "Intermediaries that facilitate university–industry research partnerships: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    19. Belfiore, Alessandra & Cuccurullo, Corrado & Aria, Massimo, 2022. "IoT in healthcare: A scientometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    20. Maria Cohen & Gabriela Fernandes & Pedro Godinho, 2025. "Measuring the impacts of university-industry R&D collaborations: a systematic literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 345-374, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:595-:d:718813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.