IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16394-d996693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wheat Straw Burial Enhances the Root Physiology, Productivity, and Water Utilization Efficiency of Rice under Alternative Wetting and Drying Irrigation

Author

Listed:
  • Willy Franz Gouertoumbo

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yousef Alhaj Hamoud

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xiangping Guo

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Hiba Shaghaleh

    (College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Amar Ali Adam Hamad

    (College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Elsayed Elsadek

    (College of Agriculture, Damietta University, Damietta 34517, Egypt
    College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

Abstract

This study evaluated whether the straw burial and alternative wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation could improve the root activity, yield, and water utilization efficiency (WUE) of rice. Accordingly, we conducted a field experiment with three straw burial levels, i.e., with no straw burial (NSB), low straw burial 300 kg.ha −1 (LSB), and dense straw burial 800 kg.ha −1 (DSB), and three irrigation regimes, i.e., alternate wetting/moderate drying (AWMD), alternate wetting/severe drying (AWSD), and alternate wetting/critical drying (AWCD). Results showed that straw burial improved the root activity, rice yield, and WUE under AWD regimes. The combination AWMD×DSB resulted in the greatest values of total dry mass (1764.7 g/m 2 ) and water use (853.1 mm). Conversely, the treatment AWCD × NSB led to the lowest values of total biomass (583.3 g/m 2 ) and water use (321.8 mm). Root dry weight density (1.11 g cm −3 ) and root active absorption area (31.6 m 2 plant −1 ) were higher in the treatment AWMD × DSB than root dry weight density (0.41 g cm −3 ) and root active absorption area (21.2 m 2 plant −1 ) were in the treatment AWCD×NSB. The former combined treatment increased root oxidation ability (55.5 mg g −1 FWh −1 ), the root surface phosphatase activity (1.67 mg g −1 FWh −1 ) and nitrate reductase activity of root (14.4 μg g −1 h −1 ) while the latter considerably reduced the values of root oxidation ability (21.4 mg g −1 FWh −1 ), the root surface phosphatase activity (0.87 mg g −1 FWh −1 ) and nitrate reductase activity of root (5.8 μg g −1 h −1 ). The following conclusions can be drawn with regard to water use and biomass yield. (i) The reduction in water consumption was greater than the reduction in yield in the case of AWSD. (ii) The decline in water consumption was less than the decline in biomass yield in the case of AWCD. (iii) The increase in in water consumption was greater than the increase in biomass yield in the case of AWMD. Therefore, the indicators of WUE were recorded in the following order: AWSD > AWMD > AWCD. This study recommends AWD irrigation to improve the root growth traits that contribute to the greater biomass yield of rice. It also suggests that farmers should implement AWD irrigation after leaving wheat straw residues in the field, and followed by deep tillage, to mitigate the negative effect of drought stress caused by AWD irrigation, preserving plant growth without large biomass losses, and thus, addressing the constrains of straw residues and sustaining rice production under limited freshwater resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Willy Franz Gouertoumbo & Yousef Alhaj Hamoud & Xiangping Guo & Hiba Shaghaleh & Amar Ali Adam Hamad & Elsayed Elsadek, 2022. "Wheat Straw Burial Enhances the Root Physiology, Productivity, and Water Utilization Efficiency of Rice under Alternative Wetting and Drying Irrigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16394-:d:996693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16394/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16394/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaghaleh, Hiba & Xu, Xu & Liu, He & Wang, Shifa & Alhaj Hamoud, Yousef & Dong, Fuhao & Luo, Jinyue, 2019. "The effect of atmospheric pressure plasma pretreatment with various gases on the structural characteristics and chemical composition of wheat straw and applications to enzymatic hydrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 195-210.
    2. Yang, Changming & Yang, Linzhang & Yang, Yongxing & Ouyang, Zhu, 2004. "Rice root growth and nutrient uptake as influenced by organic manure in continuously and alternately flooded paddy soils," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 67-81, October.
    3. Liu, S. & Yang, J.Y. & Zhang, X.Y. & Drury, C.F. & Reynolds, W.D. & Hoogenboom, G., 2013. "Modelling crop yield, soil water content and soil temperature for a soybean–maize rotation under conventional and conservation tillage systems in Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 32-44.
    4. Alhaj Hamoud, Yousef & Shaghaleh, Hiba & Sheteiwy, Mohamed & Guo, Xiangping & Elshaikh, Nazar A. & Ullah Khan, Nasr & Oumarou, Abdoulaye & Rahim, Shah Fahad, 2019. "Impact of alternative wetting and soil drying and soil clay content on the morphological and physiological traits of rice roots and their relationships to yield and nutrient use-efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Jensen, Christian R. & Battilani, Adriano & Plauborg, Finn & Psarras, Georgios & Chartzoulakis, Kostas & Janowiak, Franciszek & Stikic, Radmila & Jovanovic, Zorica & Li, Guitong & Qi, Xuebin & Liu, Fu, 2010. "Deficit irrigation based on drought tolerance and root signalling in potatoes and tomatoes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 403-413, December.
    6. Belder, P. & Bouman, B. A. M. & Cabangon, R. & Guoan, Lu & Quilang, E. J. P. & Yuanhua, Li & Spiertz, J. H. J. & Tuong, T. P., 2004. "Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 193-210, March.
    7. Xu, Guo-wei & Lu, Da-Ke & Wang, He-Zheng & Li, Youjun, 2018. "Morphological and physiological traits of rice roots and their relationships to yield and nitrogen utilization as influenced by irrigation regime and nitrogen rate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 385-394.
    8. Bouman, B. A. M. & Tuong, T. P., 2001. "Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 11-30, July.
    9. Pan, Junfeng & Liu, Yanzhuo & Zhong, Xuhua & Lampayan, Rubenito M. & Singleton, Grant R. & Huang, Nongrong & Liang, Kaiming & Peng, Bilin & Tian, Ka, 2017. "Grain yield, water productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of rice under different water management and fertilizer-N inputs in South China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 191-200.
    10. Bouman, B.A.M. & Peng, S. & Castaneda, A.R. & Visperas, R.M., 2005. "Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 87-105, June.
    11. Alhaj Hamoud, Yousef & Guo, Xiangping & Wang, Zhenchang & Shaghaleh, Hiba & Chen, Sheng & Hassan, Alfadil & Bakour, Ahmad, 2019. "Effects of irrigation regime and soil clay content and their interaction on the biological yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen-use efficiency of rice grown in southern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 934-946.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alhaj Hamoud, Yousef & Shaghaleh, Hiba & Sheteiwy, Mohamed & Guo, Xiangping & Elshaikh, Nazar A. & Ullah Khan, Nasr & Oumarou, Abdoulaye & Rahim, Shah Fahad, 2019. "Impact of alternative wetting and soil drying and soil clay content on the morphological and physiological traits of rice roots and their relationships to yield and nutrient use-efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Ishfaq, Muhammad & Farooq, Muhammad & Zulfiqar, Usman & Hussain, Saddam & Akbar, Nadeem & Nawaz, Ahmad & Anjum, Shakeel Ahmad, 2020. "Alternate wetting and drying: A water-saving and ecofriendly rice production system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Alhaj Hamoud, Yousef & Guo, Xiangping & Wang, Zhenchang & Shaghaleh, Hiba & Chen, Sheng & Hassan, Alfadil & Bakour, Ahmad, 2019. "Effects of irrigation regime and soil clay content and their interaction on the biological yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen-use efficiency of rice grown in southern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 934-946.
    4. Yang, Jia & Ren, Wei & Ouyang, Ying & Feng, Gary & Tao, Bo & Granger, Joshua J. & Poudel, Krishna P., 2019. "Projection of 21st century irrigation water requirement across the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 60-72.
    5. Zheng, Junlin & Chen, Taotao & Wu, Qi & Yu, Jianming & Chen, Wei & Chen, Yinglong & Siddique, Kadambot H.M. & Meng, Weizhong & Chi, Daocai & Xia, Guimin, 2018. "Effect of zeolite application on phenology, grain yield and grain quality in rice under water stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 241-251.
    6. Yu, Qianan & Cui, Yuanlai, 2022. "Improvement and testing of ORYZA model water balance modules for alternate wetting and drying irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    7. Islam, S.M. Mofijul & Gaihre, Yam Kanta & Biswas, Jatish Chandra & Jahan, Md. Sarwar & Singh, Upendra & Adhikary, Sanjoy Kumar & Satter, M. Abdus & Saleque, M.A., 2018. "Different nitrogen rates and methods of application for dry season rice cultivation with alternate wetting and drying irrigation: Fate of nitrogen and grain yield," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 144-153.
    8. Luo, Wanqi & Chen, Mengting & Kang, Yinhong & Li, Wenping & Li, Dan & Cui, Yuanlai & Khan, Shahbaz & Luo, Yufeng, 2022. "Analysis of crop water requirements and irrigation demands for rice: Implications for increasing effective rainfall," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    9. Belder, P. & Bouman, B. A.M. & Spiertz, J.H.J., 2007. "Exploring options for water savings in lowland rice using a modelling approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-3), pages 91-114, January.
    10. Ian A. Navarrete & Victor B. Asio, 2014. "Research productivity in soil science in the Philippines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(1), pages 261-272, July.
    11. Bueno, C.S. & Bucourt, M. & Kobayashi, N. & Inubushi, K. & Lafarge, T., 2010. "Water productivity of contrasting rice genotypes grown under water-saving conditions in the tropics and investigation of morphological traits for adaptation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 241-250, December.
    12. Thakur, Amod K. & Mandal, Krishna G. & Mohanty, Rajeeb K. & Ambast, Sunil K., 2018. "Rice root growth, photosynthesis, yield and water productivity improvements through modifying cultivation practices and water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 67-77.
    13. Feng, Liping & Bouman, B. A.M. & Tuong, T.P. & Cabangon, R.J. & Li, Yalong & Lu, Guoan & Feng, Yuehua, 2007. "Exploring options to grow rice using less water in northern China using a modelling approach: I. Field experiments and model evaluation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(1-3), pages 1-13, March.
    14. Manel Ben Hassen & Federica Monaco & Arianna Facchi & Marco Romani & Giampiero Valè & Guido Sali, 2017. "Economic Performance of Traditional and Modern Rice Varieties under Different Water Management Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, February.
    15. Yufeng Luo & Haolong Fu & Seydou Traore, 2014. "Biodiversity Conservation in Rice Paddies in China: Toward Ecological Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Cao, Jingjing & Tan, Junwei & Cui, Yuanlai & Luo, Yufeng, 2019. "Irrigation scheduling of paddy rice using short-term weather forecast data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 714-723.
    17. Wang, Hong & Zhang, Yan & Zhang, Yaojun & McDaniel, Marshall D. & Sun, Lan & Su, Wei & Fan, Xiaorong & Liu, Shuhua & Xiao, Xin, 2020. "Water-saving irrigation is a ‘win-win’ management strategy in rice paddies – With both reduced greenhouse gas emissions and enhanced water use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Liang, Kaiming & Zhong, Xuhua & Huang, Nongrong & Lampayan, Rubenito M. & Pan, Junfeng & Tian, Ka & Liu, Yanzhuo, 2016. "Grain yield, water productivity and CH4 emission of irrigated rice in response to water management in south China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 319-331.
    19. Patel, D.P. & Das, Anup & Munda, G.C. & Ghosh, P.K. & Bordoloi, Juri Sandhya & Kumar, Manoj, 2010. "Evaluation of yield and physiological attributes of high-yielding rice varieties under aerobic and flood-irrigated management practices in mid-hills ecosystem," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(9), pages 1269-1276, September.
    20. Dasgupta, Pragna & Das, Bhabani S. & Sen, Soumitra K., 2015. "Soil water potential and recoverable water stress in drought tolerant and susceptible rice varieties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 110-118.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16394-:d:996693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.