IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15786-d985930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to the Adoption of Reverse Logistics in the Construction Industry: A Combined ISM and MICMAC Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Margarida Pimentel

    (Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Amílcar Arantes

    (CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Carlos Oliveira Cruz

    (CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

With growing environmental concerns, reverse logistics (RL) assumes a significant role in the sustainability of the construction industry to the extent that it can contribute to mitigating some of the negative environmental impacts related to its activity. However, despite the benefits that can be attributed to RL, its implementation level in the construction industry is still very low. This research determines the root barriers to adopting RL in construction (ARLC) using the case of the Portuguese construction market. The methodology involved focus groups and a combined Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) and Matrices d’Impacts cross-multiplication appliqúe a classmate (MICMAC) approach. The root barriers that have been identified by the application of the methodology to the ARLC are: lack of financial incentives to incorporate recycled materials, lack of knowledge about RL, lack of technical support, standard codes and regulations in favor of using recycled materials, lack of information sharing, cooperation and coordination among entities of the supply chain, current buildings have not been designed for deconstruction, and lack of construction and demolition waste (CDW) management and recycling infrastructures and markets for the materials resulting from CDW. The highest hierarchical level includes barrier B10 (lack of financial incentives to incorporate recycled materials into the construction); this barrier influences all the other barriers and, as such, it is considered the key barrier to the ARLC in Portugal. The research has also identified 17 different mitigation measures to tackle these barriers, with different natures: fiscal, regulatory, financial, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Margarida Pimentel & Amílcar Arantes & Carlos Oliveira Cruz, 2022. "Barriers to the Adoption of Reverse Logistics in the Construction Industry: A Combined ISM and MICMAC Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15786-:d:985930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15786/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15786/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guofeng Ma & Jianyao Jia & Jiyong Ding & Shanshan Shang & Shan Jiang, 2019. "Interpretive Structural Model Based Factor Analysis of BIM Adoption in Chinese Construction Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Chukwuebuka M. U-Dominic & Ifeyinwa Juliet Orji & Modestus Okwu, 2021. "Analyzing the Barriers to Reverse Logistics (RL) Implementation: A Hybrid Model Based on IF-DEMATEL-EDAS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, September.
    3. V. Daniel R. Guide & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2009. "OR FORUM---The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 10-18, February.
    4. Naim Ahmad & Ayman Qahmash, 2021. "SmartISM: Implementation and Assessment of Interpretive Structural Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ibrahim, Mustapha D. & Pereira, Miguel Alves & Caldas, Paulo, 2024. "Efficiency analysis of the innovation-driven sustainable logistics industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Wenjie & Liu, Wei & Shen, Ningning & Xu, Zhitao & Xie, Naiming & Chen, Jian & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "Pricing and collection decisions of a closed-loop supply chain with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    2. Patricia van Loon & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Ales Mihelic, 2022. "Designing a circular business strategy: 7 years of evolution at a large washing machine manufacturer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1030-1041, March.
    3. Matthias Kalverkamp & Alexandra Pehlken & Thorsten Wuest, 2017. "Cascade Use and the Management of Product Lifecycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chow, Pui-Sze & Lee, Chang Hwan & Shen, Bin, 2018. "Used intimate apparel collection programs: A game-theoretic analytical study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 44-62.
    5. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Nebojša Brkljač & Milan Delić & Marko Orošnjak & Nenad Medić & Slavko Rakić & Ljiljana Popović, 2024. "Interdependent Influences of Reverse Logistics Implementation Barriers in the Conditions of an Emerging Economy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Rika Ampuh Hadiguna, 2012. "Decision support framework for risk assessment of sustainable supply chain," International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1/2), pages 35-54.
    8. Wu, Xiaole & Zhou, Yu, 2019. "Buyer-specific versus uniform pricing in a closed-loop supply chain with third-party remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 548-560.
    9. Kyung Sung Jung & Milind Dawande & H. Neil Geismar & V. Daniel R. Guide & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2016. "Supply planning models for a remanufacturer under just-in-time manufacturing environment with reverse logistics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(2), pages 533-581, May.
    10. Tianqin Shi & Dilip Chhajed & Zhixi Wan & Yunchuan Liu, 2020. "Distribution Channel Choice and Divisional Conflict in Remanufacturing Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1702-1719, July.
    11. David F. Drake & Stefan Spinler, 2013. "OM Forum —Sustainable Operations Management: An Enduring Stream or a Passing Fancy?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 689-700, October.
    12. Tolga Aydinliyim & Eren B. Çil & Nagesh N. Murthy, 2023. "Input material reduction incentives versus scrap recycling for closed‐loop supply chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(10), pages 3328-3346, October.
    13. Raghad Almashhour & Abroon Qazi & M. K. S. Al-Mhdawi & Abdelkader Daghfous & Bilal M. Ayyub & Alan O’Connor, 2025. "Analyzing Barriers to Sustainable Enterprise Risk Management in the Construction Sector: A Delphi Method and Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-27, October.
    14. Paul Swagemakers & Maria Dolores Dominguez Garcia & Johannes S. C. Wiskerke, 2018. "Socially-Inclusive Development and Value Creation: How a Composting Project in Galicia (Spain) ‘Hit the Rocks’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Gemechu Abdissa & Abebe Ayalew & Anna Dunay & Csaba Bálint Illés, 2022. "Role of Reverse Logistics Activities in the Recycling of Used Plastic Bottled Water Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Li, Gendao & Reimann, Marc & Zhang, Weihua, 2018. "When remanufacturing meets product quality improvement: The impact of production cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 913-925.
    17. Omar Besbes & Adam N. Elmachtoub & Yunjie Sun, 2020. "Pricing Analytics for Rotable Spare Parts," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 313-324, September.
    18. Weisheng Deng, 2019. "Does Remanufacturing Always Benefit the Manufacturer and Hurt the Supplier?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    19. Agarwal, Richa & Bhadauria, Artee & Kaushik, Hans & Swami, Sanjeev & Rajwanshi, Rohit, 2023. "ISM-MICMAC-based study on key enablers in the adoption of solar renewable energy products in India," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Pietro Giovanni, 2017. "Closed-loop supply chain coordination through incentives with asymmetric information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 133-167, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15786-:d:985930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.