IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15651-d983131.html

Strip Intercrop of Barley, Wheat, Triticale, Oat, Pea and Yellow Lupine—A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lech Gałęzewski

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, University of Science and Technology, 7 Prof. S. Kaliskiego St., 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Iwona Jaskulska

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, University of Science and Technology, 7 Prof. S. Kaliskiego St., 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Dariusz Jaskulski

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, University of Science and Technology, 7 Prof. S. Kaliskiego St., 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Edward Wilczewski

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, University of Science and Technology, 7 Prof. S. Kaliskiego St., 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Marek Kościński

    (National Food Industry Group, 40 Kraszewskiego St., 87-100 Torun, Poland)

Abstract

The simultaneous sowing of two or more species in the same field without a fixed location in relation to each other—mixed intercropping—is associated with the problem of optimizing agrotechnics for plants with different requirements and instability of the composition of the crop. An alternative which eliminates these problems can be strip intercropping. Based on the published results of seven long-term field experiments aimed at understanding the proximity effect of various species in strip intercropping, a mathematical simulation of strip intercropping production effects was performed: oat/lupine, barley/pea, wheat/pea, triticale/pea, wheat/barley, wheat/triticale, and triticale/barley. The simulation takes into account different widths of the strips and the possibility of their separation by a path. The yield of strip intercropping consisting of cereals and legumes was similar to the average yield of both components grown in single-species crops. Separating the cereal from the legume plant by a path did not have a major effect on the total yield; however, it increased the share of the legume plant in the yield. The width of the strips was also important in terms of yield and the share of individual species in the yield, especially when strips were separated by a path. Taking into account the level of yield and the technical possibilities of optimizing agrotechnics for each of the components separately, as well as the possibility of separate harvesting, then strip intercropping and strip intercropping separated by paths, with 3 m wide strips, are justified. The analysis of the results showed that the formation of strip intercropping or strip intercropping separated by paths consisting of only two species of cereals does not bring production benefits when compared to monoculture of the individual components.

Suggested Citation

  • Lech Gałęzewski & Iwona Jaskulska & Dariusz Jaskulski & Edward Wilczewski & Marek Kościński, 2022. "Strip Intercrop of Barley, Wheat, Triticale, Oat, Pea and Yellow Lupine—A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15651-:d:983131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15651/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15651/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John M. Antle & Srabashi Ray, 2020. "Sustainable Agricultural Development," Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-030-34599-0, June.
    2. Iwona Jaskulska & Dariusz Jaskulski & Lech Gałęzewski, 2022. "Peas and Barley Grown in the Strip-Till One Pass Technology as Row Intercropping Components in Sustainable Crop Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Martin Weih & Alison J. Karley & Adrian C. Newton & Lars P. Kiær & Christoph Scherber & Diego Rubiales & Eveline Adam & James Ajal & Jana Brandmeier & Silvia Pappagallo & Angel Villegas-Fernández & Mo, 2021. "Grain Yield Stability of Cereal-Legume Intercrops Is Greater Than Sole Crops in More Productive Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Uttam Khanal & Kerry J. Stott & Roger Armstrong & James G. Nuttall & Frank Henry & Brendan P. Christy & Meredith Mitchell & Penny A. Riffkin & Ashley J. Wallace & Malcolm McCaskill & Thabo Thayalakuma, 2021. "Intercropping—Evaluating the Advantages to Broadacre Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Lech Gałęzewski & Iwona Jaskulska & Edward Wilczewski & Anna Wenda-Piesik, 2020. "Response of Yellow Lupine to the Proximity of Other Plants and Unplanted Path in Strip Intercropping," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Anna Murawska & Piotr Prus, 2021. "The Progress of Sustainable Management of Ammonia Emissions from Agriculture in European Union States Including Poland—Variation, Trends, and Economic Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Maw Ni Soe Htet & Jiang-Bo Hai & Poe Thinzar Bo & Xiang-Wei Gong & Chun-Juan Liu & Ke Dang & Li-Xin Tian & Rab Nawaz Soomro & Khaing Lin Aung & Bai-Li Feng, 2021. "Evaluation of Nutritive Values through Comparison of Forage Yield and Silage Quality of Mono-Cropped and Intercropped Maize-Soybean Harvested at Two Maturity Stages," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Nicolas Carton & Christophe Naudin & Guillaume Piva & Guénaëlle Corre-Hellou, 2020. "Intercropping Winter Lupin and Triticale Increases Weed Suppression and Total Yield," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Monika Gebska & Anna Grontkowska & Wiesław Swiderek & Barbara Golebiewska, 2020. "Farmer Awareness and Implementation of Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Different Types of Farms in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thanh Mai Ha & Gordana Manevska-Tasevska & Martin Weih & Helena Hansson, 2024. "Heterogeneity in farmers’ stage of behavioural change in intercropping adoption: an application of the Transtheoretical Model," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Martin Weih & M. Inés Mínguez & Stefano Tavoletti, 2022. "Intercropping Systems for Sustainable Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-4, February.
    3. repec:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:9:p:3665-3702 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ieva Knoknerienė & Rolandas Bleizgys & Vilma Naujokienė, 2025. "Surface Moisture Control for Sustainable Manure Management: Reducing Ammonia Emissions and Preserving Nutrients," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Majid Khan & Dr. Naila Nazir, 2023. "Economic Growth and Social Equity: An Empirical Analysis of Inclusive Growth in Pakistan," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(4), pages 734-738.
    6. Claudia Di Bene & Rosa Francaviglia & Roberta Farina & Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes & Raúl Zornoza, 2022. "Agricultural Diversification," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-6, March.
    7. Barbara Breza-Boruta & Justyna Bauza-Kaszewska, 2023. "Effect of Microbial Preparation and Biomass Incorporation on Soil Biological and Chemical Properties," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Shankarappa Sridhara & Pradeep Gopakkali & Konapura Nagaraja Manoj & Kiran Kumar R. Patil & Venkatesh Paramesh & Prakash Kumar Jha & P. V. Vara Prasad, 2022. "Identification of Sustainable Development Priorities for Agriculture through Sustainable Livelihood Security Indicators for Karnataka, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Eleni Zafeiriou & Spyros Galatsidas & Christina Moulogianni & Spyridon Sofios & Garyfallos Arabatzis, 2024. "Evaluating Enteric Fermentation-Driven Environmental Kuznets Curve Dynamics: A Bayesian Vector Autoregression Comparative Study of the EU and Least Developed Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Mohammad Badsar & Matin Moghim & Mehdi Ghasemi, 2023. "Analysis of factors influencing farmers’ sustainable environmental behavior in agriculture activities: integration of the planned behavior and the protection motivation theories," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9903-9934, September.
    11. Maw Ni Soe Htet & Honglu Wang & Vivek Yadav & Thongsouk Sompouviseth & Baili Feng, 2022. "Legume Integration Augments the Forage Productivity and Quality in Maize-Based System in the Loess Plateau Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Gheorghe Hurduzeu & Radu Lucian Pânzaru & Dragoș Mihai Medelete & Andi Ciobanu & Constanța Enea, 2022. "The Development of Sustainable Agriculture in EU Countries and the Potential Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals Specific Targets (SDG 2)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Xian Liu, 2022. "Analysis of Crop Sustainability Production Potential in Northwest China: Water Resources Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Yan, Elodie & Martin, Philippe & Carozzi, Marco, 2025. "Main characteristics of French farms adopting cereal–legume intercropping: A quantitative exploration at the national and local levels," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    15. Basso, Bruno & Jones, James W. & Antle, John & Martinez-Feria, Rafael A. & Verma, Brahm, 2021. "Enabling circularity in grain production systems with novel technologies and policy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    16. Rafał Górski & Anna Płaza, 2024. "The Effects of Intercropping Narrowleaf Lupine with Cereals under Variable Mineral Nitrogen Fertilization," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Meunier, Elliot & Smith, Pauline & Griessinger, Thibaud & Robert, Corinne, 2024. "Understanding changes in reducing pesticide use by farmers: Contribution of the behavioural sciences," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    18. Jacques Fils Pierre & Luis Latournerie-Moreno & René Garruña & Krista L. Jacobsen & Carrie A. M. Laboski & Roberth Us-Santamaría & Esaú Ruiz-Sánchez, 2022. "Effect of Maize–Legume Intercropping on Maize Physio-Agronomic Parameters and Beneficial Insect Abundance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    19. Beata Kalinowska & Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Bogdan Klepacki & Aleksandra Perkowska & Tomasz Rokicki, 2022. "Sustainable Development of Agriculture in Member States of the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Morteza Zangeneh & Narges Banaeian & Sean Clark, 2021. "Meta-Analysis on Energy-Use Patterns of Cropping Systems in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, March.
    21. Ahmad Bathaei & Dalia Streimikiene, 2025. "Assessing Sustainable Agriculture in the EU/Baltic Countries Using Multi‐Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and EUROSTAT Data Using Stakeholder's View," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 7429-7440, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15651-:d:983131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.