IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15646-d983052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Potential for Multi-Functional Use of Industrial Hemp Greater than Maize under Saline Conditions?

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Tedeschi

    (National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources, Research Division Portici (CNR-IBBR),Via Università 133, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Domenico Cerrato

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics—Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops, Via Torrino 3, 81100 Caserta, Italy)

  • Massimo Menenti

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands
    State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

There is a new and growing interest in using hemp as a raw material for a wide portfolio of food and non-food products. This study provides a synthesis of such information on the basis of literature and experimental data. For comparison, similar information on maize is provided. To document multiple uses of both crops, a list of products was compiled and the fraction of the total dry biomass of each plant part used for each product was estimated. A field experiment was carried out on the response of hemp and maize to irrigation scheduling and to the quality of irrigation water. Both literature and our experiment show that water and salinity stress reduce the total dry biomass, but do not modify substantially the relative availability for the intended marketable products. The field experiment did show that total biomass declined as salinity increased for both crops, but the partition in different fractions did not change significantly with the increase in salinity for all plant fractions and both crops. The market value of the observed, reduced, yield of maize and hemp was estimated. The experimental findings suggest that widespread use of hemp would lead to a more resilient and sustainable agri-food system, although regulatory and medium enterprise policies should be adapted to bring about this development.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Tedeschi & Domenico Cerrato & Massimo Menenti, 2022. "Is the Potential for Multi-Functional Use of Industrial Hemp Greater than Maize under Saline Conditions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-33, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15646-:d:983052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15646/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15646/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katerji, N. & van Hoorn, J. W. & Hamdy, A. & Karam, F. & Mastrorilli, M., 1994. "Effect of salinity on emergence and on water stress and early seedling growth of sunflower and maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(1-2), pages 81-91, September.
    2. Tiziano Gomiero, 2015. "Are Biofuels an Effective and Viable Energy Strategy for Industrialized Societies? A Reasoned Overview of Potentials and Limits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-31, June.
    3. Tedeschi, A. & Dell'Aquila, R., 2005. "Effects of irrigation with saline waters, at different concentrations, on soil physical and chemical characteristics," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 77(1-3), pages 308-322, August.
    4. Amer, Kamal H., 2010. "Corn crop response under managing different irrigation and salinity levels," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1553-1563, October.
    5. Olaf Erenstein & Moti Jaleta & Kai Sonder & Khondoker Mottaleb & B.M. Prasanna, 2022. "Global maize production, consumption and trade: trends and R&D implications," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(5), pages 1295-1319, October.
    6. Kanter, David R. & Musumba, Mark & Wood, Sylvia L.R. & Palm, Cheryl & Antle, John & Balvanera, Patricia & Dale, Virginia H. & Havlik, Petr & Kline, Keith L. & Scholes, R.J. & Thornton, Philip & Titton, 2018. "Evaluating agricultural trade-offs in the age of sustainable development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 73-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farhadi Machekposhti, Mabood & Shahnazari, Ali & Z. Ahmadi, Mirkhalegh & Aghajani, Ghasem & Ritzema, Henk, 2017. "Effect of irrigation with sea water on soil salinity and yield of oleic sunflower," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 69-78.
    2. Yinchuan Liu & Lili He & Yuying Cao & Xinyue Gao & Shoutian Dong & Yinjiang Jia, 2025. "DECC-Net: A Maize Tassel Segmentation Model Based on UAV-Captured Imagery," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. D. Rahimi & D. Kartoolinejad & K. Nourmohammadi & R. Naghdi, 2016. "Increasing drought resistance of Alnus subcordata C.A. Mey. seeds using a nano priming technique with multi-walled carbon nanotubes," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(6), pages 269-278.
    4. Nancy Diana Panta, 2020. "Applying Value Chain Analysis through the Lens of Sustainability to Enterprises in the Beekeeping Sector," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Adriana Grigorescu & Valentin Radu (ed.), 1st International Conference Global Ethics - Key of Sustainability (GEKoS), edition 1, volume 11, chapter 12, pages 107-116, Editura Lumen.
    5. Cooper, Gregory S. & Rich, Karl M. & Shankar, Bhavani & Rana, Vinay & Ratna, Nazmun N. & Kadiyala, Suneetha & Alam, Mohammad J. & Nadagouda, Sharan B., 2021. "Identifying ‘win-win-win’ futures from inequitable value chain trade-offs: A system dynamics approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. Coilín ÓhAiseadha & Gerré Quinn & Ronan Connolly & Michael Connolly & Willie Soon, 2020. "Energy and Climate Policy—An Evaluation of Global Climate Change Expenditure 2011–2018," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-49, September.
    7. Yingling Zhou & Jianfang Peng & Zhiyong Zhang & Yangjie Li & Ling Cheng, 2025. "Evaluation and obstacle factors diagnosis of Agriculture Green Development level in China’s Yangtze River Basin based on the DPSIR framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4971-4999, February.
    8. José Augusto Correa Martins & Alberto Yoshiriki Hisano Higuti & Aiesca Oliveira Pellegrin & Raquel Soares Juliano & Adriana Mello de Araújo & Luiz Alberto Pellegrin & Veraldo Liesenberg & Ana Paula Ma, 2024. "Assessment of UAV-Based Deep Learning for Corn Crop Analysis in Midwest Brazil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Marek Ogryzek & Krzysztof Rząsa & Ryszard Źróbek, 2021. "Change in the Level of Agricultural Development in the Context of Public Institutions’ Activities—A Case Study of the NASC Activities in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Chengkai Yang & Jingkai Lei & Zhihao Liu & Shufeng Xiong & Lei Xi & Jian Wang & Hongbo Qiao & Lei Shi, 2025. "Estimation Model of Corn Leaf Area Index Based on Improved CNN," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Smith, Laurence G. & Westaway, Sally & Mullender, Samantha & Ghaley, Bhim Bahadur & Xu, Ying & Lehmann, Lisa Mølgaard & Pisanelli, Andrea & Russo, Giuseppe & Borek, Robert & Wawer, Rafał & Borzęcka, M, 2022. "Assessing the multidimensional elements of sustainability in European agroforestry systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Bussoni, Adriana & Cubbage, Frederick & Alvarez Giambruno, Jorge, 2021. "Silvopastoral systems and multi-criteria optimization for compatible economic and environmental outcomes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    13. Hongpeng Guo & Xin Yi & Chulin Pan & Baiming Yang & Yin Li, 2021. "Analysis on the Temporal and Spatial Features of the Coupling and Coordination of Industrialization and Agricultural Green Development in China during 1990–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-27, August.
    14. Palosuo, Taru & Hoffmann, Munir P. & Rötter, Reimund P. & Lehtonen, Heikki S., 2021. "Sustainable intensification of crop production under alternative future changes in climate and technology: The case of the North Savo region," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    15. Lekarkar, Katoria & Nkwasa, Albert & Villani, Lorenzo & van Griensven, Ann, 2024. "Localizing agricultural impacts of 21st century climate pathways in data scarce catchments: A case study of the Nyando catchment, Kenya," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    16. Marlena Gołaś & Piotr Sulewski & Adam Wąs & Anna Kłoczko-Gajewska & Kinga Pogodzińska, 2020. "On the Way to Sustainable Agriculture—Eco-Efficiency of Polish Commercial Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Buttinelli, Rebecca & Cortignani, Raffaele & Caracciolo, Francesco, 2024. "Irrigation water economic value and productivity: An econometric estimation for maize grain production in Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    18. Kang, Yaohu & Chen, Ming & Wan, Shuqin, 2010. "Effects of drip irrigation with saline water on waxy maize (Zea mays L. var. ceratina Kulesh) in North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(9), pages 1303-1309, September.
    19. Dong, Xinliang & Wang, Jintao & Zhang, Xuejia & Dang, Hongkai & Singh, Bhupinder Pal & Liu, Xiaojing & Sun, Hongyong, 2022. "Long-term saline water irrigation decreased soil organic carbon and inorganic carbon contents," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    20. Zhang, Tibin & Dong, Qin’ge & Zhan, Xiaoyun & He, Jianqiang & Feng, Hao, 2019. "Moving salts in an impermeable saline-sodic soil with drip irrigation to permit wolfberry production," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 636-645.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15646-:d:983052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.