IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15465-d979411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Indicators of Health-Safety in the Risk Assessment of Landfill with the Combined Method of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making and Bow Tie Model

Author

Listed:
  • Talieh Abdolkhaninezhad

    (Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1477893855, Iran)

  • Masoud Monavari

    (Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1477893855, Iran)

  • Nematollah Khorasani

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 1417935840, Iran)

  • Maryam Robati

    (Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1477893855, Iran)

  • Forogh Farsad

    (Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1477893855, Iran)

Abstract

The study and analysis of safety, health and environmental indicators in the risk assessment of landfill sites are essential to improving performance and reducing injuries. This study is essential in identifying effective criteria and providing useful solutions for proper waste control and management. In Gilan province, 2200 tons of waste enter landfills every day, and this has created a lot of pollution in the area. The methodology of this research was chosen using the opinions of experts and the Delphi technique. Factors affecting the risk assessment in the construction and operation phases were investigated in two phases. The risks of a landfill project were identified by combining (FANP) and (FTOPSIS) using a multi-criteria decision bow tie technique to rank and prioritize criteria. The results show that urban landfills are one of the environmental risk factors in cities. They often contaminate water sources. This has caused a disturbance in the stability of ecological systems. Using the bow tie model can control and prevent environmental health-safety risks caused by urban waste disposal. This can be a threat and a big factor in the destruction of ecosystem resources and services. The integrated approach used in this study provides a flexible tool for evaluating and developing municipal landfills. The risk assessment study proves that the most involved areas in the landfill are environment and health-safety, respectively. Socio-economic and cultural fields are in the next categories. Due to their nature and working process, lancets face many environmental, safety and health risks. The integrated approach (FANP) and (FTOPSIS) with bow ties are suitable methods for risk assessment in landfills. It is very important to use the bow tie technique in analyzing, examining and prioritizing risk sources for management and also control measures such as preventing and limiting high-risk sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Talieh Abdolkhaninezhad & Masoud Monavari & Nematollah Khorasani & Maryam Robati & Forogh Farsad, 2022. "Analysis Indicators of Health-Safety in the Risk Assessment of Landfill with the Combined Method of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making and Bow Tie Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15465-:d:979411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15465/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15465/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pei-Yao Su & Jing-Hong Guo & Qi-Gan Shao, 2021. "Construction of the Quality Evaluation Index System of MOOC Platforms Based on the User Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Vitor Anes & António Abreu & Ana Dias & João Calado, 2022. "A Reputational-Risk-Based Match Selection Framework for Collaborative Networks in the Logistics Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Singh, Shweta & Upadhyay, Surya Prakash & Powar, Satvasheel, 2022. "Developing an integrated social, economic, environmental, and technical analysis model for sustainable development using hybrid multi-criteria decision making methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    4. Dongxiao Niu & Hao Zhen & Min Yu & Keke Wang & Lijie Sun & Xiaomin Xu, 2020. "Prioritization of Renewable Energy Alternatives for China by Using a Hybrid FMCDM Methodology with Uncertain Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Karen L. Astles & Roland Cormier, 2018. "Implementing Sustainably Managed Fisheries Using Ecological Risk Assessment and Bowtie Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-33, October.
    6. Proshikshya Mukherjee & Prasant Kumar Pattnaik & Ahmed Abdulhakim Al-Absi & Dae-Ki Kang, 2021. "Recommended System for Cluster Head Selection in a Remote Sensor Cloud Environment Using the Fuzzy-Based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Mohsen Ramezanzade & Hossein Karimi & Khalid Almutairi & Hoa Ao Xuan & Javad Saebi & Ali Mostafaeipour & Kuaanan Techato, 2021. "Implementing MCDM Techniques for Ranking Renewable Energy Projects under Fuzzy Environment: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-38, November.
    8. Qingfu Li & Chuangshi Fan, 2022. "Evaluation of Hydraulic-Tunnel-Lining Durability Based on ANP and Cloud-Model-Improved Matter–Element Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dalal Aassouli & Ayodele Akande & Ray Jureidini, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Food Governance and the Alignment of Food Security Policies to Sustainable Development: A Case Study of OIC Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam & Md. Mijanur Rahman Bappi & Saeed Alqadhi & Ahmed Ali Bindajam & Javed Mallick & Swapan Talukdar, 2023. "Improvement of flood susceptibility mapping by introducing hybrid ensemble learning algorithms and high-resolution satellite imageries," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(1), pages 1-37, October.
    3. Nebiyu Kedir & Phuong H. D. Nguyen & Citlaly Pérez & Pedro Ponce & Aminah Robinson Fayek, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review on Fuzzy Hybrid Methods in Photovoltaic Solar Energy: Opportunities, Challenges, and Guidance for Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-38, April.
    4. Adnan Veysel Ertemel & Akin Menekse & Hatice Camgoz Akdag, 2023. "Smartphone Addiction Assessment Using Pythagorean Fuzzy CRITIC-TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Chuan Li & Liangrong Song, 2022. "Regional Differences and Spatial Convergence of Green Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Favi, Claudio & Marconi, Marco & Mandolini, Marco & Germani, Michele, 2022. "Sustainable life cycle and energy management of discrete manufacturing plants in the industry 4.0 framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    7. Jun Luo & Xuebing Zhang & Peiji Shi, 2022. "Land Use Multi-Functionality and Zoning Governance Strategy of Densely Populated Areas in the Upper Reaches of the Yellow River: A Case Study of the Lanzhou–Xining Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Junbin Wang, 2022. "Drivers of the Sustainable Development of Agro-industrial Parks: Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    9. Chen, Yixuan & Hou, Yunhe, 2022. "Fast yet balanced trade-offs for multi-timescale multi-objective economic-environmental dispatch under varying conflicts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    10. Asadi, Meysam & Ramezanzade, Mohsen & Pourhossein, Kazem, 2023. "A global evaluation model applied to wind power plant site selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    11. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Bączkiewicz, Aleksandra & Sałabun, Wojciech, 2022. "New multi-criteria method for evaluation of sustainable RES management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    12. Mateo Barrera-Zapata & Fabian Zuñiga-Cortes & Eduardo Caicedo-Bravo, 2023. "A Framework for Evaluating Renewable Energy for Decision-Making Integrating a Hybrid FAHP-TOPSIS Approach: A Case Study in Valle del Cauca, Colombia," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Xiong, Hualin & Xu, Beibei & Kheav, Kimleng & Luo, Xingqi & Zhang, Xingjin & Patelli, Edoardo & Guo, Pengcheng & Chen, Diyi, 2021. "Multiscale power fluctuation evaluation of a hydro-wind-photovoltaic system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 153-166.
    14. Deveci, Muhammet & Pamucar, Dragan & Oguz, Elif, 2022. "Floating photovoltaic site selection using fuzzy rough numbers based LAAW and RAFSI model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    15. Limei Liu & Xinyun Chen & Yi Yang & Junfeng Yang & Jie Chen, 2023. "Prioritization of Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Residential Communities in China Considering Public Participation with Basic Uncertain Linguistic Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, May.
    16. Liujie Zhu & Changsheng Wang & Chuangshi Fan & Qingfu Li, 2023. "Evaluation of Hydraulic Tunnel Lining Durability Based on Entropy–G2 and Gray Correlation–TOPSIS Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Mohsen Ramezanzade & Hossein Karimi & Khalid Almutairi & Hoa Ao Xuan & Javad Saebi & Ali Mostafaeipour & Kuaanan Techato, 2021. "Implementing MCDM Techniques for Ranking Renewable Energy Projects under Fuzzy Environment: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-38, November.
    18. Horasan, Muhammed Bilal & Kilic, Huseyin Selcuk, 2022. "A multi-objective decision-making model for renewable energy planning: The case of Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 484-504.
    19. Zehba Raizah & Udaya Kumara Kodipalya Nanjappa & Harshitha Urs Ajjipura Shankar & Umair Khan & Sayed M. Eldin & Rajesh Kumar & Ahmed M. Galal, 2022. "Windmill Global Sourcing in an Initiative Using a Spherical Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision Prototype," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-13, October.
    20. Mahammad Nuriyev & Aziz Nuriyev & Jeyhun Mammadov, 2023. "Renewable Energy Transition Task Solution for the Oil Countries Using Scenario-Driven Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Models: The Case of Azerbaijan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15465-:d:979411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.