IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15360-d977122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ecological Footprint and Allocation of Guangxi Beibu Gulf Urban Agglomeration

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Pang

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Juan Yin

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China
    Guangxi Bossco Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., Nanning 530007, China)

  • Shimei Li

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Yunnan Zou

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Yunlan Zhang

    (Department of Economic and Trade, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Xinyue Liang

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Rui Huang

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China)

Abstract

To understand the allocation efficiency and fairness of natural capital in the Guangxi Beibu Gulf urban agglomeration, its ecological footprint from 2007 to 2020 was calculated based on the emergy ecological footprint (EEF) model, and the 10,000 Yuan GDP and Gini coefficient were introduced. The results show that (1) in the past 14 years, the per capita ecological footprint of the urban agglomeration slowly increased, the ecological pressure index rapidly increased with an average annual growth rate of 6.55%, and the regional ecological safety showed an unsafe trend. (2) The regional ecological footprint was mainly based on cultivated land, construction land and fossil energy land, of which the latter two significantly increased. For construction land, the average annual per capita growth rate in the central city of Nanning and the coastal cities (Fangchenggang, Beihai and Qinzhou) exceeded 10%, ranging from 11.39%–25.70%. For fossil energy land, the annual average per capita growth rate in Fangchenggang and Chongzuo exceeded 10%, at 19.64% and 11.40%, respectively. During urbanization, increasing population density leads to increased regional consumption of electricity and energy, thus affecting the regional ecological security. (3) The resource utilization efficiency improved annually, and the resource allocation was generally fair. Nanning and Beihai had high economic contributions and low ecological carrying capacities, Qinzhou and Chongzuo had low economic contributions and high ecological carrying capacities, and Yulin and Fangchenggang had low economic contributions and low ecological carrying capacities. These results clarify the differences among cities in the development of the Guangxi Beibu Gulf urban agglomeration, improve the efficiency of natural resource allocation, and provide a reference for the achievement of regional sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Pang & Juan Yin & Shimei Li & Yunnan Zou & Yunlan Zhang & Xinyue Liang & Rui Huang, 2022. "The Ecological Footprint and Allocation of Guangxi Beibu Gulf Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15360-:d:977122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15360/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15360/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Max Rehberger & Michael Hiete, 2020. "Allocation of Environmental Impacts in Circular and Cascade Use of Resources—Incentive-Driven Allocation as a Prerequisite for Cascade Persistence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Laterra, Pedro & Nahuelhual, Laura & Vallejos, María & Berrouet, Lina & Arroyo Pérez, Erika & Enrico, Lucas & Jiménez-Sierra, Cecilia & Mejía, Kathya & Meli, Paula & Rincón-Ruíz, Alexander & Salas, Da, 2019. "Linking inequalities and ecosystem services in Latin America," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Li Yang & Sumaiya Bashiru Danwana & Fadilul-lah Yassaanah Issahaku, 2022. "Achieving Environmental Sustainability in Africa: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption, Natural Resources, and Government Effectiveness—Evidence from Symmetric and Asymmetric ARDL Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Jing Guo, 2022. "Evaluation and Prediction of Ecological Sustainability in the Upper Reaches of the Yellow River Based on Improved Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Muhammad Usman & Atif Jahanger & Magdalena Radulescu & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente, 2022. "Do Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy, and Environmental-Related Technologies Asymmetrically Reduce Ecological Footprint? Evidence from Pakistan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Junlong Li & Chuangneng Cai & Feng Zhang, 2020. "Assessment of Ecological Efficiency and Environmental Sustainability of the Minjiang-Source in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Libo Liang & Xiaona Liu & Pengfei Ge, 2025. "The Fairness Evaluation on Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of Ecological Footprint: A Case Study of Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatima Zahra Moussaid & Hikma Bachegour & Mounir Jerry & Ahlam Qafas, 2025. "Probing the asymmetric impact of clean energy technologies on environmental quality: testing load capacity curve hypothesis in Spain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4425-4444, February.
    2. Lanre Ibrahim, Ridwan & Bello Ajide, Kazeem & Usman, Muhammad & Kousar, Rakhshanda, 2022. "Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: Do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 244-256.
    3. Liu, Yang & Wang, Jianda & Dong, Kangyin & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2023. "How does natural resource abundance affect green total factor productivity in the era of green finance? Global evidence," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Huang, Anzhong & Dai, Luote & Ali, Sajid & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday, 2024. "From funds to footprints: Unravelling the asymmetric association between nuclear energy technology and environmental quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    5. Mesut Dogan & Irina Georgescu & Hamza Çeştepe & Sevgi Sümerli Sarıgül & Havanur Ergün Tatar, 2025. "Renewable Energy Consumption and the Ecological Footprint in Denmark: Assessing the Influence of Financial Development and Agricultural Contribution," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Yésica Gomez‐Jaramillo & Lina Berrouet & Clara Villegas‐Palacio & Linda Berrio‐Giraldo, 2024. "Conceptual framework for analyzing the sustainability of socio‐ecological systems with a focus on ecosystem services that support water security," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2298-2313, June.
    7. Ali, Mumtaz & Joof, Foday & Samour, Ahmed & Tursoy, Turgut & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Radulescu, Magdalena, 2023. "Testing the impacts of renewable energy, natural resources rent, and technological innovation on the ecological footprint in the USA: Evidence from Bootstrapping ARDL," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    8. Balvanera, Patricia & Pérez-Harguindeguy, Natalia & Perevochtchikova, María & Laterra, Pedro & Cáceres, Daniel M. & Langle-Flores, Alfonso, 2020. "Ecosystem services research in Latin America 2.0: Expanding collaboration across countries, disciplines, and sectors," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    9. Tremlett, Constance J. & Peh, Kelvin S.-H. & Zamora-Gutierrez, Veronica & Schaafsma, Marije, 2021. "Value and benefit distribution of pollination services provided by bats in the production of cactus fruits in central Mexico," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    10. Leonora Charlotte Malabi Eberhardt & Anne van Stijn & Freja Nygaard Rasmussen & Morten Birkved & Harpa Birgisdottir, 2020. "Development of a Life Cycle Assessment Allocation Approach for Circular Economy in the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Below, Jonathan von & Nahuelhual, Laura & Eleuterio, Ana Alice & Laterra, Pedro, 2021. "Can participatory action research foster social learning in communities struggling for land tenure?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Pei-Pei Jiang & Yuan Wang & Jin Luo & Lin Zhu & Rui Shi & Song Hu & Xiaodong Zhu, 2023. "Measuring static and dynamic industrial eco-efficiency in China based on the MinDS–Malmquist–Luenberger model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5241-5261, June.
    13. Sae Eun Lee & Kyu-Hye Lee, 2024. "Environmentally sustainable fashion and conspicuous behavior," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Nalan IŞIK, 2024. "Journey to Discover the Footprint of Tourism from the Perspective of Ecological Modernization," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 32(60).
    15. Tan, Qingmei & Yasmeen, Humaira & Ali, Sharafat & Ismail, Hina & Zameer, Hashim, 2023. "Fintech development, renewable energy consumption, government effectiveness and management of natural resources along the belt and road countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    16. Magdalena Radulescu & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente & Foday Joof & Ahmed Samour & Turgut Türsoy, 2022. "Exploring the Impacts of Banking Development, and Renewable Energy on Ecological Footprint in OECD: New Evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Hongzhang Xu & Meng Peng & Jamie Pittock & Jiayu Xu, 2021. "Managing Rather Than Avoiding “Difficulties” in Building Landscape Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Joof, Foday & Samour, Ahmed & Ali, Mumtaz & Tursoy, Turgut & Haseeb, Mohammad & Hossain, Md. Emran & Kamal, Mustafa, 2023. "Symmetric and asymmetric effects of gold, and oil price on environment: The role of clean energy in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Atif Jahanger & Yang Yu & Ashar Awan & Muhammad Zubair Chishti & Magdalena Radulescu & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente, 2022. "The Impact of Hydropower Energy in Malaysia Under the EKC Hypothesis: Evidence From Quantile ARDL Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    20. Sardar Fawad Saleem & Muhammad Azam Khan & Muhammad Tariq, 2025. "Moderating role of government effectiveness and innovation in sustainable economic growth relationship in Middle East & North Africa countries," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(1), pages 516-540, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15360-:d:977122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.