IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15161-d973885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Security Challenges and Economic-Geographical Metrics for Analyzing Safety to Achieve Sustainable Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Jekl

    (Department of Mathematics and Physics, Faculty of Military Technology, University of Defence, Kounicova 65, 662 10 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Jiří Jánský

    (Department of Mathematics and Physics, Faculty of Military Technology, University of Defence, Kounicova 65, 662 10 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

In this article, we aim to develop the theoretical background for the possible application of Economic-Geographical metrics in the field of population protection. We deal with various options for analyzing the availability of “safety” for citizens using studied metrics. Among others, we apply well-known metrics such as the Gini coefficient, Hoover index and even establish their generalizations. We develop a theoretical background and evaluate our findings on generated and actual data. We find that the metrics used can have an opposite interpretation depending on the scenario we are considering. We also discover that some scenarios demand a modification to the usual metric. We conclude that Economic-Geographical metrics give valuable tools to address specific security challenges. Metric’s generalizations could serve as a potent tool for other authors working in the field of population protection. Nevertheless, we must keep in mind that metrics also have drawbacks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Jekl & Jiří Jánský, 2022. "Security Challenges and Economic-Geographical Metrics for Analyzing Safety to Achieve Sustainable Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15161-:d:973885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esposito Amideo, A. & Scaparra, M.P. & Kotiadis, K., 2019. "Optimising shelter location and evacuation routing operations: The critical issues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 279-295.
    2. Druckman, A. & Jackson, T., 2008. "Measuring resource inequalities: The concepts and methodology for an area-based Gini coefficient," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 242-252, April.
    3. Boisjoly, Geneviève & Moreno-Monroy, Ana Isabel & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2017. "Informality and accessibility to jobs by public transit: Evidence from the São Paulo Metropolitan Region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 89-96.
    4. Hao Wu & Lingbo Liu & Yang Yu & Zhenghong Peng, 2018. "Evaluation and Planning of Urban Green Space Distribution Based on Mobile Phone Data and Two-Step Floating Catchment Area Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, January.
    5. Roberta La Haye & Petr Zizler, 2019. "The Gini mean difference and variance," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 77(1), pages 43-52, April.
    6. Xianyuan Chang & Zhaoping Wu & Yi Chen & Yuanyuan Du & Longfei Shang & Ying Ge & Jie Chang & Guofu Yang, 2021. "The Booming Number of Museums and Their Inequality Changes in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Chiara Mussida & Maria Laura Parisi, 2018. "Immigrant groups’ income inequality within and across Italian regions," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 16(4), pages 655-671, December.
    8. Sharma, Gajanand & Patil, Gopal R., 2021. "Public transit accessibility approach to understand the equity for public healthcare services: A case study of Greater Mumbai," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Dahao Zhang & Guojun Zhang & Chunshan Zhou, 2021. "Differences in Accessibility of Public Health Facilities in Hierarchical Municipalities and the Spatial Pattern Characteristics of Their Services in Doumen District, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Sarina Yusoff & Nur Hafizah Yusoff, 2022. "Disaster Risks Management through Adaptive Actions from Human-Based Perspective: Case Study of 2014 Flood Disaster," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Xiaomeng Zhu & Zhijun Tong & Xingpeng Liu & Xiangqian Li & Pengda Lin & Tong Wang, 2018. "An Improved Two-Step Floating Catchment Area Method for Evaluating Spatial Accessibility to Urban Emergency Shelters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruowen Liu & Hao Wang & Xiaogang Ning & Xingfei Cai & Xiaoyuan Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of Coordinated Development Policy on the Spatiotemporal Changes of Industrial Structure of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meihan Jin & Lu Liu & De Tong & Yongxi Gong & Yu Liu, 2019. "Evaluating the Spatial Accessibility and Distribution Balance of Multi-Level Medical Service Facilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Jin, Tanhua & Cheng, Long & Wang, Kailai & Cao, Jun & Huang, Haosheng & Witlox, Frank, 2022. "Examining equity in accessibility to multi-tier healthcare services across different income households using estimated travel time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Trajkovski, Samantha & Zabel, Jeffrey & Schwartz, Amy Ellen, 2021. "Do school buses make school choice work?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Boisjoly, Geneviève & Serra, Bernardo & Oliveira, Gabriel T. & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2020. "Accessibility measurements in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba and Recife, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Daniel Oviedo & Lynn Scholl & Marco Innao & Lauramaria Pedraza, 2019. "Do Bus Rapid Transit Systems Improve Accessibility to Job Opportunities for the Poor? The Case of Lima, Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Gabriella Vitorino Guimarães & Tálita Floriano Santos & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes & Jorge Eliécer Córdoba Maquilón & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva, 2020. "Assessment for the Social Sustainability and Equity under the Perspective of Accessibility to Jobs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Ivanize Silva & Rafael Santos & António Lopes & Virgínia Araújo, 2018. "Morphological Indices as Urban Planning Tools in Northeastern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Vitor Pestana Ostrensky & Alexandre Alves Porsse & Leonardo Matsuno da Frota, 2022. "Public transport and gentrification. Evidence from São Paulo metro new stations," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(6), pages 254-269, December.
    9. Miloslava Plachkinova & Au Vo & Brian Hilton & Rahul Bhaskar, 2018. "Response to Delamater’s Comment on “A Conceptual Framework for Quality Healthcare Accessibility: A Scalable Approach for Big Data Technologies”," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 311-314, April.
    10. Soheyl Khalilpourazari & Seyed Hamid Reza Pasandideh, 2021. "Designing emergency flood evacuation plans using robust optimization and artificial intelligence," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 640-677, April.
    11. Frank Cowell & Emmanuel Flachaire, 2021. "Inequality Measurement: Methods and Data," Post-Print hal-03589066, HAL.
    12. Tao, Sui & Cheng, Long & He, Sylvia & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Examining the non-linear effects of transit accessibility on daily trip duration: A focus on the low-income population," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Zhang, Guowei & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Xia, Jun, 2021. "Humanitarian relief network assessment using collaborative truck-and-drone system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    14. Daniel S. A. Carvalho & Gervásio F. Santos, 2022. "Transport and density of population groups in the urban area of the city of Salvador," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(6), pages 234-253, December.
    15. Zhao, Congyu & Jia, Rongwen & Dong, Kangyin, 2023. "Does financial inclusion achieve the dual dividends of narrowing carbon inequality within cities and between cities? Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    16. Boukary OUEDRAOGO & Sylvie FERRARI, 2012. "Incidence of forest income in reducing poverty and inequalities:\r\nEvidence from forest dependent households in managed forests’ areas in Burkina Faso," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2012-28, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    17. Haliza Mohd Zahari & Noor Azmi Mohd Zainol & Ariffin Ismail, 2022. "Media Information, Flood Images, and Perceptions in Times of Flood," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Rui Chen & Yali Zhao & Juan Du & Tao Wu & Yafang Huang & Aimin Guo, 2014. "Health Workforce Equity in Urban Community Health Service of China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Karimpour, Abolfazl & Hosseinzadeh, Aryan & Kluger, Robert, 2023. "A data-driven approach to estimating dockless electric scooter service areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Bouvier, Rachel, 2014. "Distribution of income and toxic emissions in Maine, United States: Inequality in two dimensions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 39-47.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15161-:d:973885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.