IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14603-d965189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Three Automated Identification Methods for Ground Object Based on UAV Imagery

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Zhang

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Graduate School of Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan)

  • Sarvesh Maskey

    (Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan)

  • Hiromu Okazawa

    (Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan)

  • Kiichiro Hayashi

    (Institute of Material and Systems for Sustainable, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan)

  • Tamano Hayashi

    (Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology of Regional Environment Science, Ryukoku University, Kyoto 612-8577, Japan)

  • Ayako Sekiyama

    (Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan)

  • Sawahiko Shimada

    (Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan)

  • Lameck Fiwa

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe P.O. Box 219, Malawi)

Abstract

Identification and monitoring of diverse resources or wastes on the ground is important for integrated resource management. The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), with its high resolution and facility, is the optimal tool for monitoring ground objects accurately and efficiently. However, previous studies have focused on applying classification methodology on land use and agronomy, and few studies have compared different classification methods using UAV imagery. It is necessary to fully utilize the high resolution of UAV by applying the classification methodology to ground object identification. This study compared three classification methods: A. NDVI threshold, B. RGB image-based machine learning, and C. object-based image analysis (OBIA). Method A was the least time-consuming and could identify vegetation and soil with high accuracy (user’s accuracy > 0.80), but had poor performance at classifying dead vegetation, plastic, and metal (user’s accuracy < 0.50). Both Methods B and C were time- and labor-consuming, but had very high accuracy in separating vegetation, soil, plastic, and metal (user’s accuracy ≥ 0.70 for all classes). Method B showed a good performance in identifying objects with bright colors, whereas Method C showed a high ability in separating objects with similar visual appearances. Scientifically, this study has verified the possibility of using the existing classification methods on identifying small ground objects with a size of less than 1 m, and has discussed the reasons for the different accuracy of the three methods. Practically, these results help users from different fields to choose an appropriate method that suits their target, so that different wastes or multiple resources can be monitored at the same time by combining different methods, which contributes to an improved integrated resource management system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Zhang & Sarvesh Maskey & Hiromu Okazawa & Kiichiro Hayashi & Tamano Hayashi & Ayako Sekiyama & Sawahiko Shimada & Lameck Fiwa, 2022. "Assessment of Three Automated Identification Methods for Ground Object Based on UAV Imagery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14603-:d:965189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14603/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14603/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noudeng Vongdala & Hoang-Dung Tran & Tran Dang Xuan & Rolf Teschke & Tran Dang Khanh, 2018. "Heavy Metal Accumulation in Water, Soil, and Plants of Municipal Solid Waste Landfill in Vientiane, Laos," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Navarro Ferronato & Vincenzo Torretta, 2019. "Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martha María Mayes-Ramírez & Francisco Jesús Gálvez-Sánchez & Ángel Fermín Ramos-Ridao & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2023. "Urban Waste: Visualizing the Academic Literature through Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Asif Iqbal & Abdullah Yasar & Abdul-Sattar Nizami & Rafia Haider & Faiza Sharif & Imran Ali Sultan & Amtul Bari Tabinda & Aman Anwer Kedwaii & Muhammad Murtaza Chaudhary, 2022. "Municipal Solid Waste Collection and Haulage Modeling Design for Lahore, Pakistan: Transition toward Sustainability and Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-39, December.
    3. Ashfaq, Asma & Khan, Zafar Iqbal & Ahmad, Kafeel & Ashraf, Muhammad Arslan & Hussain, Muhammad Iftikhar & Elghareeb, Eman M., 2022. "Hazard of selenium metal contamination in vegetables grown in municipal solid waste amended soil: Assessment of the potential sources and systemic health effects," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    4. Jatau Ramond Yohanna, 2023. "Effluent Pollution in Custodial Centres and its Environs in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(2), pages 1341-1352, February.
    5. Anna Mazzi & Michela Sciarrone & Roberto Raga, 2022. "Environmental Performance of Semi-Aerobic Landfill by Means of Life Cycle Assessment Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Yijia Wang & Senwei Huang & Jia Liu, 2023. "Research on the Rural Environmental Governance and Interaction Effects of Farmers under the Perspective of Circular Economy—Evidence from Three Provinces of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Marco Bardus & May A. Massoud, 2022. "Predicting the Intention to Sort Waste at Home in Rural Communities in Lebanon: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Hang Yin & Yixiong Huang & Kuiming Wang, 2021. "How Do Environmental Concerns and Governance Performance Affect Public Environmental Participation: A Case Study of Waste Sorting in Urban China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Saowanee Wijitkosum, 2023. "Repurposing Disposable Bamboo Chopsticks Waste as Biochar for Agronomical Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Emily Ying Yang Chan & Tiffany Sze Tung Sham & Tayyab Salim Shahzada & Caroline Dubois & Zhe Huang & Sida Liu & Kevin K.C. Hung & Shelly L.A. Tse & Kin On Kwok & Pui-Hong Chung & Ryoma Kayano & Rajib , 2020. "Narrative Review on Health-EDRM Primary Prevention Measures for Vector-Borne Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-28, August.
    11. Ren-Shou Yu & Sher Singh, 2023. "Microplastic Pollution: Threats and Impacts on Global Marine Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Yousif Mohammed Elmosaad & Ahmed M. Al Rajeh & Maria Blesilda B. Llaguno & Sami Saad Alqaimi & Ali Mohammed Alsalman & Ali Yousif Alkishi & Hassan Hussain & Mohammed Ahmed Alhoudaib & Othman Saad Alna, 2023. "Self-Reported Household Waste Recycling and Segregation Practices among Families in Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Sajid, Muhammad & Raheem, Abdul & Ullah, Naeem & Asim, Muhammad & Ur Rehman, Muhammad Saif & Ali, Nisar, 2022. "Gasification of municipal solid waste: Progress, challenges, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Gasmi, Farid & Kouakou, Dorgyles & Sanni, Maruf, 2022. "The effect of firm informality on sustainable and responsible innovation in developing countries: Evidence from Nigeria," TSE Working Papers 22-1368, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    15. Eduardo Santos & Fernando Fonseca & Aníbal Santiago & Daniel Rodrigues, 2024. "Sustainability Indicators Model Applied to Waste Management in Brazil Using the DPSIR Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Hafiz Wasim Akram & Samreen Akhtar & Alam Ahmad & Imran Anwar & Mohammad Ali Bait Ali Sulaiman, 2023. "Developing a Conceptual Framework Model for Effective Perishable Food Cold-Supply-Chain Management Based on Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    17. Raman Kumar & Shubham Sharma & Ranvijay Kumar & Sanjeev Verma & Mohammad Rafighi, 2023. "Review of Lubrication and Cooling in Computer Numerical Control (CNC) Machine Tools: A Content and Visualization Analysis, Research Hotspots and Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-44, March.
    18. Nahed Ahmed Hussien, 2023. "Antimicrobial Potential of Biosynthesized Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Using Banana Peel and Date Seeds Extracts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, June.
    19. Agus Ganda Permana & Jangkung Raharjo, 2023. "Integrated Waste Management System with IOT-Based Centralized Control towards a Smart Eco Campus-Telkom University," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(2), pages 322-333, March.
    20. Thaís Karolina Lisboa de Queiroz & Volney de Magalhães Câmara & Karytta Sousa Naka & Lorena de Cássia dos Santos Mendes & Brenda Rodrigues Chagas & Iracina Maura de Jesus & Armando Meyer & Marcelo de , 2022. "Human Health Risk Assessment Is Associated with the Consumption of Metal-Contaminated Groundwater around the Marituba Landfill, Amazonia, Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14603-:d:965189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.