IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14415-d962214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dilemma and Countermeasures of Public Interest Litigation of Marine Environmental Pollution in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yingying Li

    (Law School, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

Abstract

Cases of marine environmental pollution (MEP), such as condensate leakage in the Sanchi case, not only directly infringe on private personal health and property rights, but also cause serious damage to the marine ecological environment. This paper analyzes dozens of MEP cases and summarizes the typical rights, interests, and remedies under Chinese law. Traditional tort liability legislation remedies the problem of infringement of private interests by environmental torts through compensation and punitive damages but it cannot reverse the damage to the marine ecological environment. Traditional civil legislation is built on the basis of rights and interests regarding damages and relief. MEP infringes on a wide range of citizens’ environmental rights and should be addressed by the environmental public interest litigation (EPIL), which is an important way to protect citizens’ environmental rights. This paper analyzes the legal interests, relief measures, and limitations of the existing EPIL legislation that is applicable to MEP cases under Chinese law, so as to make corresponding legislative suggestions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingying Li, 2022. "The Dilemma and Countermeasures of Public Interest Litigation of Marine Environmental Pollution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14415-:d:962214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14415/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14415/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570310482282 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jane Broadbent & Richard Laughlin, 2003. "Public private partnerships: an introduction," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(3), pages 332-341, August.
    3. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Cai, Hongbin, 2003. "A Theory of Joint Asset Ownership," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 34(1), pages 63-77, Spring.
    5. Liu, Dan & Zhu, Ling, 2014. "Assessing China׳s legislation on compensation for marine ecological damage: A case study of the Bohai oil spill," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 18-26.
    6. Taye Demissie Beshi & Ranvinderjit Kaur, 2020. "Public Trust in Local Government: Explaining the Role of Good Governance Practices," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 337-350, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khleef A. Alkhawaldeh, 2021. "Institutional Governance Practices in Jordan Government Units," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 52-65.
    2. Patrick W. Schmitz, 2006. "Information Gathering, Transaction Costs, and the Property Rights Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(1), pages 422-434, March.
    3. Björn Mestdagh & Olivier Sempiga & Luc Van Liedekerke, 2023. "The Impact of External Shocks on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Linking the COVID-19 Pandemic to SDG Implementation at the Local Government Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Timothy Guinnane & Jakob Schneebacher, 2018. "Capital Structure and the Choice of Enterprise Form: theory and history," Working Papers 1061, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    5. Hideshi Itoh & Hodaka Morita, 2006. "Formal Contracts, Relational Contracts, and the Holdup Problem," CESifo Working Paper Series 1786, CESifo.
    6. Charlie Joyez, 2017. "Firm heterogeneity and the integration trilemma: The utility of Joint ventures in integration versus outsourcing models," Working Papers DT/2017/09, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    7. Jolink, Albert & Niesten, Eva, 2012. "Recent qualitative advances on hybrid organizations: Taking stock, looking ahead," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 149-161.
    8. Nicoletta Berardi & Paul Seabright, 2020. "Joint Ownership of Production Projects as a Commitment Device against Interest Groups," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 176(3), pages 572-594.
    9. Halonen-Akatwijuka, Maija & Pafilis, Evagelos, 2020. "Common ownership of public goods," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 555-578.
    10. Nguyen Ba Chien & Nguyen Nghi Thanh, 2022. "The Impact of Good Governance on the People’s Satisfaction with Public Administrative Services in Vietnam," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, February.
    11. Su, Alice Peng-Ju, 2017. "Information revelation in the Property Right Theory of the firms," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 133-164.
    12. Ankush Goyal & Rajender Kumar, 2022. "Does Social Welfare Programmes Influence Households Trust in Local Administration and Their Political Participation? Evidence from the MGNREG Scheme in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 16(3), pages 602-617, December.
    13. Nicola Dimitri, 2021. "The “Italian Football Federation Auction” for Co-ownership Resolution," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 58(2), pages 275-285, March.
    14. Christian A. Ruzzier, 2009. "Asset Specificity and Vertical Integration: Williamson’s Hypothesis Reconsidered," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-119, Harvard Business School.
    15. Naomi Lamoreaux & Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, 2004. "Corporate Governance and the Plight of Minority Shareholders in the United States Before the Great Depression," NBER Working Papers 10900, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Hangfei Guo & Mingming Leng & Yulan Wang, 2012. "Interchange fee rate, merchant discount rate, and retail price in a credit card network: A game‐theoretic analysis," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(7), pages 525-551, October.
    17. Mori, Yusuke, 2020. "Ex ante investment, ex post adaptation, and joint ownership," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    18. Gattai, Valeria & Natale, Piergiovanna, 2013. "What makes a joint venture: Micro-evidence from Sino-Italian contracts," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 194-205.
    19. Müller, Daniel & Schmitz, Patrick W., 2016. "Transaction costs and the property rights approach to the theory of the firm," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 92-107.
    20. Hodaka Morita & Maroš Servátka, 2018. "Investment in Outside Options as Opportunistic Behavior: An Experimental Investigation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(2), pages 457-484, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14415-:d:962214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.