IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13838-d952566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Evaluation of Coordinated Development of Tourism–Economy–Ecological Environment along the Silk Road Economic Belt

Author

Listed:
  • Zhe Zhang

    (School of Economics, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Jianxiong Qin

    (School of Historical Culture & Tourism, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Li Luo

    (School of Economics, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Yaxin Feng

    (Independent Researcher, Gold Coast 4207, Australia)

Abstract

Tourism is currently one of the important development industries in many countries and regions, and a healthy environment is an important basis and carrier for the sustainable development of the tourism economy. Ensuring a harmonious relationship between tourism, the economy, and the environment has become one of the keys to achieving sustainable development of tourism destinations. Based on panel data on tourism, the economy, and the environment from nine provinces along the Silk Road Economic Belt from 2015 to 2019, this study has built a comprehensive evaluation index system of the tourism–economy–ecological environment (TEE). The entropy evaluation method, comprehensive evaluation model, and coupling and coordination degree model were used for quantitative analysis of the coordination development level and for assessing the spatial–temporal evolution patterns of coupling coordination for the TEE system in nine provinces along the Silk Road Economic Belt. The results show that the value of the TEE system is generally on the rise. Still, the growth rate of tourism and the economy subsystem is significantly higher than that of the environment subsystem. The coupling coordinating the development of the TEE system shows an increasing trend with a high degree of coupling. The coordination degree is relatively low, with significant gradient differences and apparent polarization. The main constraint to the coordinated development of the Silk Road Economic Belt is tourism and the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhe Zhang & Jianxiong Qin & Li Luo & Yaxin Feng, 2022. "Research on the Evaluation of Coordinated Development of Tourism–Economy–Ecological Environment along the Silk Road Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13838-:d:952566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13838/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13838/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaoai Liu & Wan-Yi Li, 2020. "Ecotourism Research Progress: A Bibliometric Analysis During 1990–2016," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    2. Lacitignola, D. & Petrosillo, I. & Cataldi, M. & Zurlini, G., 2007. "Modelling socio-ecological tourism-based systems for sustainability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 191-204.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Difan Liu & Yuejian Wang & Lei Wang & Liping Xu & Huanhuan Chen & Yuxiang Ma, 2023. "Analysis of Spatiotemporal Changes in the Gravitational Structure of Urban Agglomerations in Northern and Southern Xinjiang Based on a Gravitational Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prakoso Havidz Ageng & Syahputri Gusti C. A. & Syaprin Zahidi M. & Roziqin Ali, 2023. "Research trajectory on tourism policy: a bibliometric overview," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 56-66, December.
    2. Petr Štumpf & Jitka Mattyašovská & Adriana Krištùfková, 2021. "Restart of Hospitality and Tourism: System Dynamics and Scenario-Based Modelling," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 14(2), pages 125-136.
    3. Perez-Mujica, Luisa & Duncan, Roderick & Bossomaier, Terry, 2014. "Using agent-based models to design social marketing campaign," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 36-44.
    4. T.V. Ramachandra & H. A. Bharath & M. V. Sowmyashree, 2013. "Analysis Of Spatial Patterns Of Urbanisation Using Geoinformatics And Spatial Metrics," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(4), pages 5-24, November.
    5. Arbieu, Ugo & Grünewald, Claudia & Martín-López, Berta & Schleuning, Matthias & Böhning-Gaese, Katrin, 2018. "Large mammal diversity matters for wildlife tourism in Southern African Protected Areas: Insights for management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 481-490.
    6. Bogdan-Constantin Ibanescu & Mihail Eva & Alexandra Gheorghiu, 2020. "Questioning the Role of Tourism as an Engine for Resilience: The Role of Accessibility and Economic Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Banos-González, Isabel & Martínez-Fernández, Julia & Esteve-Selma, Miguel Ángel, 2015. "Dynamic integration of sustainability indicators in insular socio-ecological systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 130-144.
    8. Huihui Feng & Xingpeng Chen & Peter Heck & Hong Miao, 2014. "An Entropy-Perspective Study on the Sustainable Development Potential of Tourism Destination Ecosystem in Dunhuang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Dimmock, Kay & Musa, Ghazali, 2015. "Scuba Diving Tourism System: A framework for collaborative management and sustainability," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 52-58.
    10. Chelsea L. Leven & Keith Bosak, 2022. "Concept Mapping: An Effective and Rapid Participatory Tool for Analysis of the Tourism System?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Chenyu Lu & Wenlei Li & Min Pang & Bing Xue & Hong Miao, 2018. "Quantifying the Economy-Environment Interactions in Tourism: Case of Gansu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Eric de Noronha Vaz & Antonio Brito & Peter Nijkamp & Marco Painho, 2011. "Impacts on environmental law and regulations on agricultural land-use change and urban pressure: the Algarve case," ERSA conference papers ersa10p896, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Nicolas Marine & Cecilia Arnaiz-Schmitz & Cristina Herrero-Jáuregui & Manuel Rodrigo de la O Cabrera & David Escudero & María F. Schmitz, 2020. "Protected Landscapes in Spain: Reasons for Protection and Sustainability of Conservation Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Roxanne Suzette Lorilla & Konstantinos Poirazidis & Stamatis Kalogirou & Vassilis Detsis & Aristotelis Martinis, 2018. "Assessment of the Spatial Dynamics and Interactions among Multiple Ecosystem Services to Promote Effective Policy Making across Mediterranean Island Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-28, September.
    15. Martínez-Paz, José Miguel & Banos-González, Isabel & Martínez-Fernández, Julia & Esteve-Selma, Miguel Ángel, 2019. "Assessment of management measures for the conservation of traditional irrigated lands: The case of the Huerta of Murcia (Spain)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 382-391.
    16. Kaslik, Eva & Neamţu, Mihaela, 2020. "Dynamics of a tourism sustainability model with distributed delay," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Lacitignola, Deborah & Diele, Fasma & Marangi, Carmela, 2015. "Dynamical scenarios from a two-patch predator–prey system with human control – Implications for the conservation of the wolf in the Alta Murgia National Park," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 316(C), pages 28-40.
    18. María F. Schmitz & Cecilia Arnaiz-Schmitz & Patricio Sarmiento-Mateos, 2021. "High Nature Value Farming Systems and Protected Areas: Conservation Opportunities or Land Abandonment? A Study Case in the Madrid Region (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Wang, Chao & Feng, Tian-jiao & Gao, Yan & Tao, Yi & Li, Cong, 2023. "Evolutionary stability in an eco-evolutionary game dynamics with density dependence," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Wei, W. & Alvarez, I. & Martin, S., 2013. "Sustainability analysis: Viability concepts to consider transient and asymptotical dynamics in socio-ecological tourism-based systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 103-113.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13838-:d:952566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.