IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13618-d948849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could the Management System of Safety Partnership Change Miners’ Unsafe Behavior?

Author

Listed:
  • Jiao Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Safety Science and Emergency Management Research Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Shuang Li

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Safety Science and Emergency Management Research Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Weijun Bao

    (Sun Yueqi Honors College, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Kun Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Safety Science and Emergency Management Research Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the management system of safety partnership in coal mining enterprises through the methods of evolutionary game and optimized behavioral propagation of SEIR, considering the miners’ benefits and losses, as well as the influencing factors from miners and enterprises. It is found that, under the influence of the management system of safety partnership within miners, after the evolutionary game between miner partners, the behavioral strategies and personal benefits of the two miners are both consistent. Moreover, the benefits of individual miner and overall benefits of two miner partners, will affect the miners’ choice of safe behavioral strategies, as a result of which, the coal mines could improve the miners’ benefits through the management system of safety partnership to stimulate the implementation of miners’ safe behavior. Additionally, under the incentive of the management system of the safety partnership, the number of miners implementing unsafe behavior is decreasing, while the number of miners who are not easily affected by unsafe behavior is increasing. When the rewards and punishments of miners are strengthened, the propagation of miners’ safe behavior is accelerated. Finally, the propagation of miners’ safe behavior has a certain spillover effect within a certain range. The results of this paper provide a theoretical basis for the implementation of the management system of safety partnership in coal mining enterprises, which helps enterprises in guiding miners to take up safe behavior, which is better for enterprises’ safe development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiao Liu & Shuang Li & Weijun Bao & Kun Xu, 2022. "Could the Management System of Safety Partnership Change Miners’ Unsafe Behavior?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13618-:d:948849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13618/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13618/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Shuang & Yang, Qifeng & Zhang, Yuhang & Liu, Jiao, 2022. "Multi-agent evolutionary game analysis of the coal mine on-site regulatory mode," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Jifeng Lu & Weihua Liu & Kai Yu & Lujie Zhou, 2022. "The Dynamic Evolution Law of Coal Mine Workers’ Behavior Risk Based on Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Tiehua Chen & Wenyi Hu & Jingpin Liu & Hongxia Li, 2022. "Effect of Work Values on Miners’ Safety Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment and the Moderating Role of Safety Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Guo, Shengyu & Zhou, Xinyu & Tang, Bing & Gong, Peisong, 2020. "Exploring the behavioral risk chains of accidents using complex network theory in the construction industry," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    5. Ruipeng Tong & Yunyun Yang & Xiaofei Ma & Yanwei Zhang & Shian Li & Hongqing Yang, 2019. "Risk Assessment of Miners’ Unsafe Behaviors: A Case Study of Gas Explosion Accidents in Coal Mine, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Sheo Shankar Rai & Vemavarapu M. S. R. Murthy & Nalamasa Sukesh & Akkiraju Sairam Teja & Simit Raval, 2021. "Operational efficiency of equipment system drives environmental and economic performance of surface coal mining—A sustainable development approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 25-44, January.
    7. You, Mengjie & Li, Shuang & Li, Dingwei & Cao, Qingren & Xu, Feng, 2020. "Evolutionary game analysis of coal-mine enterprise internal safety inspection system in China based on system dynamics," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Qiao, Wanguan & Liu, Quanlong & Li, Xinchun & Luo, Xixi & Wan, YuLong, 2018. "Using data mining techniques to analyze the influencing factor of unsafe behaviors in Chinese underground coal mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 210-216.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenxin Su & Xin Gao & Yukun Jiang & Jinrong Li, 2021. "Developing a Construction Safety Standard System to Enhance Safety Supervision Efficiency in China: A Theoretical Simulation of the Evolutionary Game Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, December.
    2. You, Qi & Yu, Kai & Zhou, Lujie & Zhang, Jing & Lv, Maoyun & Wang, Jiansheng, 2023. "Research on risk analysis and prevention policy of coal mine workers' group behavior based on evolutionary game," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Lan, He & Ma, Xiaoxue & Qiao, Weiliang & Deng, Wanyi, 2023. "Determining the critical risk factors for predicting the severity of ship collision accidents using a data-driven approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Zhang, Yan & Wang, Si-Xia & Yao, Jian-Ting & Tong, Rui-Peng, 2023. "The impact of behavior safety management system on coal mine work safety: A system dynamics model of quadripartite evolutionary game," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Shitao Gong & Xin Gao & Zhou Li & Linyan Chen, 2021. "Developing a Dynamic Supervision Mechanism to Improve Construction Safety Investment Supervision Efficiency in China: Theoretical Simulation of Evolutionary Game Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Liu, Lu & Zhao, Qiuhong & Bi, Yanlin, 2020. "Why rent-seeking behavior may exist in Chinese mining safety production inspection system and how to alleviate it: A tripartite game analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    7. Jin Tian & Yundou Wang & Shutian Gao, 2022. "Analysis of Mining-Related Injuries in Chinese Coal Mines and Related Risk Factors: A Statistical Research Study Based on a Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Wang, Wenhao & Wang, Yanhui & Wang, Guangxing & Li, Man & Jia, Limin, 2023. "Identification of the critical accident causative factors in the urban rail transit system by complex network theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    9. Qiao, Wanguan, 2021. "Analysis and measurement of multifactor risk in underground coal mine accidents based on coupling theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    10. Hendalianpour, Ayad & Liu, Peide & Amirghodsi, Sirous & Hamzehlou, Mohammad, 2022. "Designing a System Dynamics model to simulate criteria affecting oil and gas development contracts," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    11. Juan Wang & Xin Wan & Ruide Tu, 2022. "Game Analysis of the Evolution of Local Government’s River Chief System Implementation Strategy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Fangyuan Tian & Hongxia Li & Shuicheng Tian & Chenning Tian & Jiang Shao, 2022. "Is There a Difference in Brain Functional Connectivity between Chinese Coal Mine Workers Who Have Engaged in Unsafe Behavior and Those Who Have Not?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Baskoro, Firly Rachmaditya & Takahashi, Katsuhiko & Morikawa, Katsumi & Nagasawa, Keisuke, 2021. "System dynamics approach in determining coal utilization scenario in Indonesia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    14. Gorji, Mohammad-Ali & Shetab-Boushehri, Seyyed-Nader & Akbarzadeh, Meisam, 2023. "Evaluation and improvement of the resilience of a transportation system against epidemic diseases: A system dynamics approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 27-44.
    15. Lan, He & Ma, Xiaoxue & Qiao, Weiliang & Ma, Laihao, 2022. "On the causation of seafarers’ unsafe acts using grounded theory and association rule," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    16. Meng, Huixing & Liu, Xuan & Xing, Jinduo & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "A method for economic evaluation of predictive maintenance technologies by integrating system dynamics and evolutionary game modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    17. Ismail, Siti Noraishah & Ramli, Azizan & Aziz, Hanida Abdul, 2021. "Influencing factors on safety culture in mining industry: A systematic literature review approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Qingsong Jia & Gui Fu & Xuecai Xie & Shihan Hu, 2022. "Method Construction and Evaluation: A More Comprehensive and Reliable Classification of Coal Mine Gas Explosion Causes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Marek Kęsek & Romuald Ogrodnik, 2021. "Method for Determining the Utilization Rate of Thin-Deck Shearers Based on Recorded Electromotor Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, July.
    20. Edyta Brzychczy & Paulina Gackowiec & Mirko Liebetrau, 2020. "Data Analytic Approaches for Mining Process Improvement—Machinery Utilization Use Case," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13618-:d:948849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.