IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12836-d936462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farmers’ Credit Risk Assessment Based on Sustainable Supply Chain Finance for Green Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Yuehua Xia

    (Department of Mathematics, Gansu Normal College for Nationalities, Hezuo 747000, China)

  • Honggen Long

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Zhi Li

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Jiasen Wang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China)

Abstract

With the development of green agriculture, the demand of farmers for operation loans is increasing. Supply chain finance is becoming a new way to solve the problem of difficult credit in agricultural development. As the importance of sustainability issues continues to rise, there are growing numbers of practical examples of combining agricultural supply chain finance (ASCF) with sustainability, and the attendant risks are emerging. The objectives of this study are first to construct a risk indicator system for sustainable ASCF, then to propose a fuzzy decision method that considers the confidence of decision-makers, and finally to perform a risk assessment of a credit case in the coffee bean supply chain. A combination of the neutrosophic enhanced best–worst method (NE-BWM) and combined compromise solution (COCOSO) is used to evaluate risk problems. The practicality and effectiveness of this research method is verified by a numerical simulation and a comparison with the method. The results show that the credit rating of core companies is the most important indicator. In the context of green and sustainable development, this indicator system is more suitable for the current green transformation development of agriculture and can help decision-makers scientifically and reasonably assess the risk level of ASCF. When loans are needed to transform green agriculture, this study provides new ideas for credit models for various actors in the agricultural supply chain and offers a new entry point to the issue of sustainable agricultural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuehua Xia & Honggen Long & Zhi Li & Jiasen Wang, 2022. "Farmers’ Credit Risk Assessment Based on Sustainable Supply Chain Finance for Green Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12836-:d:936462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12836/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12836/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhaoliang Li & Minghao Jin & Jianwei Cheng, 2021. "Economic growth of green agriculture and its influencing factors in china: Based on emergy theory and spatial econometric model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15494-15512, October.
    2. Liurui Deng & Wentang Xu & Juan Luo, 2021. "Optimal Loan Pricing for Agricultural Supply Chains from a Green Credit Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Qi Zhou & Xiangfeng Chen & Shuting Li, 2018. "Innovative Financial Approach for Agricultural Sustainability: A Case Study of Alibaba," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Xuedong Liang & Xianli Zhao & Min Wang & Zhi Li, 2018. "Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Sustainable Supply Chain Financing Decision Based on Triple Bottom Line Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Zhixin Chen & Jian Chen & Zhonggen Zhang & Xiaojuan Zhi, 2019. "Does network governance based on banks’ e-commerce platform facilitate supply chain financing?," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(4), pages 688-703, June.
    6. Zhu, You & Zhou, Li & Xie, Chi & Wang, Gang-Jin & Nguyen, Truong V., 2019. "Forecasting SMEs' credit risk in supply chain finance with an enhanced hybrid ensemble machine learning approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 22-33.
    7. Bai, Chunguang & Shi, Baofeng & Liu, Feng & Sarkis, Joseph, 2019. "Banking credit worthiness: Evaluating the complex relationships," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 26-38.
    8. Zelong Yi & Yulan Wang & Ying‐Ju Chen, 2021. "Financing an Agricultural Supply Chain with a Capital‐Constrained Smallholder Farmer in Developing Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2102-2121, July.
    9. Shizhen Bai & Xuelian Jia, 2022. "Agricultural Supply Chain Financing Strategies under the Impact of Risk Attitudes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Tseng, Ming-Lang & Wu, Kuo-Jui & Hu, Jiayao & Wang, Chin-Hsin, 2018. "Decision-making model for sustainable supply chain finance under uncertainties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 30-36.
    11. Xu, Xinhan & Chen, Xiangfeng & Jia, Fu & Brown, Steve & Gong, Yu & Xu, Yifan, 2018. "Supply chain finance: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 160-173.
    12. Tseng, Ming-Lang & Lim, Ming K. & Wu, Kuo-Jui, 2019. "Improving the benefits and costs on sustainable supply chain finance under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 308-321.
    13. Johari, Maryam & Hosseini-Motlagh, Seyyed-Mahdi, 2022. "Evolutionary behaviors regarding pricing and payment-convenience strategies with uncertain risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 600-614.
    14. Josef-Peter Schöggl & Morgane M.C. Fritz & Rupert Baumgartner, 2016. "Toward supply chain-wide sustainability assessment: a conceptual framework and an aggregation method to assess supply chain performance," Post-Print hal-02547245, HAL.
    15. Dragisa Stanujkic & Gabrijela Popovic & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Darjan Karabasevic & Arune Binkyte-Veliene, 2020. "Assessment of Progress towards Achieving Sustainable Development Goals of the “Agenda 2030” by Using the CoCoSo and the Shannon Entropy Methods: The Case of the EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Rezaei, Jafar & Hemmes, Alexander & Tavasszy, Lori, 2017. "Multi-criteria decision-making for complex bundling configurations in surface transportation of air freight," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 95-105.
    17. Lam, Hugo K.S. & Zhan, Yuanzhu & Zhang, Minhao & Wang, Yichuan & Lyons, Andrew, 2019. "The effect of supply chain finance initiatives on the market value of service providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 227-238.
    18. Rezaei, Jafar, 2016. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-130.
    19. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    20. Wetzel, Philipp & Hofmann, Erik, 2019. "Supply chain finance, financial constraints and corporate performance: An explorative network analysis and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 364-383.
    21. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Abbas Mardani & Zenonas Turskis & Ahmad Jusoh & Khalil MD Nor, 2016. "Development of TOPSIS Method to Solve Complicated Decision-Making Problems — An Overview on Developments from 2000 to 2015," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 645-682, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian Li & Xin Yan & Yongwu Li & Xuefan Dong, 2023. "Optimizing the Agricultural Supply Chain through E-Commerce: A Case Study of Tudouec in Inner Mongolia, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anh Huu Nguyen & Thinh Gia Hoang & Vu Minh Ngo & Loan Quynh Thi Nguyen & Huan Huu Nguyen, 2023. "Sustainability-oriented supply chain finance in Vietnam: insights from multiple case studies," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 259-279, March.
    2. Ratri Parida & Manoj Kumar Dash & Anil Kumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Sunil Luthra & Eyob Mulat‐weldemeskel, 2022. "Evolution of supply chain finance: A comprehensive review and proposed research directions with network clustering analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1343-1369, October.
    3. Yubin Yang & Xuejian Chu & Ruiqi Pang & Feng Liu & Peifang Yang, 2021. "Identifying and Predicting the Credit Risk of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Sustainable Supply Chain Finance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Javid Nafari & Alireza Arab & Sina Ghaffari, 2017. "Through the Looking Glass: Analysis of Factors Influencing Iranian Student’s Study Abroad Motivations and Destination Choice," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, June.
    5. Mališa Žižović & Dragan Pamučar & Goran Ćirović & Miodrag M. Žižović & Boža D. Miljković, 2020. "A Model for Determining Weight Coefficients by Forming a Non-Decreasing Series at Criteria Significance Levels (NDSL)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Xiaoli Guo & Weili Xia & Taiwen Feng & Hongyan Sheng, 2022. "Sustainable supply chain finance adoption and firm performance: Is green supply chain integration a missing link?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1135-1154, October.
    7. Lele Zhou & Maowei Chen & Hyangsook Lee, 2022. "Supply Chain Finance: A Research Review and Prospects Based on a Systematic Literature Analysis from a Financial Ecology Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Kumar, Aalok & Anbanandam, Ramesh, 2022. "Assessment of environmental and social sustainability performance of the freight transportation industry: An index-based approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 43-60.
    9. Mohammadi, Majid & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Melih Yucesan & Suleyman Mete & Faruk Serin & Erkan Celik & Muhammet Gul, 2019. "An Integrated Best-Worst and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology for Green Supplier Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Meiyan Li & Yingjun Fu, 2022. "Prediction of Supply Chain Financial Credit Risk Based on PCA-GA-SVM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Mi, Xiaomei & Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang & Shen, Wenjing & Lev, Benjamin, 2019. "The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what's next?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 205-225.
    13. Yan, Nina & Jin, Xuyu & Zhong, Hechen & Xu, Xun, 2020. "Loss-averse retailers’ financial offerings to capital-constrained suppliers: loan vs. investment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    14. Huseyin Kocak & Atalay Caglar & Gulin Zeynep Oztas, 2018. "Euclidean Best–Worst Method and Its Application," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(05), pages 1587-1605, September.
    15. Yu Gong & Yun Zhang & Mohammed Alharithi, 2022. "Supply Chain Finance and Blockchain in Operations Management: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Chen, Sihua & Du, Jiangze & He, Wei & Siponen, Mikko, 2022. "Supply chain finance platform evaluation based on acceptability analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    17. Jahangoshai Rezaee, Mustafa & Yousefi, Samuel, 2018. "An intelligent decision making approach for identifying and analyzing airport risks," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 14-27.
    18. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Junnan Wu & Xin Liu & Dianqi Pan & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Kai Ke, 2023. "Research on Safety Evaluation of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Based on Improved Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12836-:d:936462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.