IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10550-d896404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of the Value of Forest Ecosystem Services in Pudacuo National Park, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Chen

    (College of Mechanics and Transportation, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Weili Kou

    (College of Big Data and Intelligence Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Xianguang Ma

    (Institute of Integrated Research, Yunnan Institute of Land Resources Planning and Design, Kunming 650216, China)

  • Xiaoyan Wei

    (Yunnan Provincial Archives of Surveying and Mapping (Yunnan Provincial Geomatics Centre), Kunming 650034, China)

  • Maojia Gong

    (College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Xiong Yin

    (College of Big Data and Intelligence Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Jingting Li

    (College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Jianqiang Li

    (College of Ecology and Environment, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

Abstract

Forest ecosystems play an important role in maintaining the stability of the biosphere and improving the ecological environment. The valuation of forest ecosystem services provides data to support the implementation of forest ecosystem conservation and the development of ecological-compensation standards. We used multiple sources of data, such as remote-sensing and ground data, and we employed the methods of substitute market, shadow project, and contingent valuation. We valued the forest ecosystem services of Pudacuo National Park in Shangri-La, China, which consisted of six functions: soil conservation, forest nutrient retention, water conservation, carbon fixation and oxygen released, forest health care, and atmospheric environmental purification. The results showed that: the value of forest ecological services in Pudacuo National Park was 4.49 × 10 9 yuan·a −1 , with higher values of carbon fixation and oxygen released, water conservation, and forest health care, in the following order: carbon fixation and oxygen released (3.85 × 10 9 yuan·a −1 ), water conservation (3.40 × 10 8 yuan·a −1 ), forest health care (1.44 × 10 8 yuan·a −1 ), soil conservation (1.15 × 10 8 yuan·a −1 ), forest nutrient retention (3.29 × 10 7 yuan·a −1 ), and atmosphere environmental purification (1.17 × 10 7 yuan·a −1 ). In addition, the value of services per stand and unit area is discussed, and the results of the study will inform the government’s ecological-compensation criteria in high-quality environmental areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Chen & Weili Kou & Xianguang Ma & Xiaoyan Wei & Maojia Gong & Xiong Yin & Jingting Li & Jianqiang Li, 2022. "Estimation of the Value of Forest Ecosystem Services in Pudacuo National Park, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10550-:d:896404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10550/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10550/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chisholm, Ryan A., 2010. "Trade-offs between ecosystem services: Water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1973-1987, August.
    2. Wang, Xuechao & Dong, Xiaobin & Liu, Huiming & Wei, Hejie & Fan, Weiguo & Lu, Nachuan & Xu, Zihan & Ren, Jiahui & Xing, Kaixiong, 2017. "Linking land use change, ecosystem services and human well-being: A case study of the Manas River Basin of Xinjiang, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 113-123.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ting Ma & Lizhi Jia & Linsheng Zhong & Xinyu Gong & Yu Wei, 2023. "Governance of China’s Potatso National Park Influenced by Local Community Participation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kibria, Abu SMG & Costanza, Robert & Soto, José R, 2022. "Modeling the complex associations of human wellbeing dimensions in a coupled human-natural system: In contexts of marginalized communities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    2. Shaofeng Yuan & Congmou Zhu & Lixia Yang & Fenghua Xie, 2019. "Responses of Ecosystem Services to Urbanization-Induced Land Use Changes in Ecologically Sensitive Suburban Areas in Hangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Xiaoyan Ren & Yuhao Yang & Zongming Wang, 2023. "A Long-Term and Comprehensive Assessment of the Ecological Costs Arising from Urban Agglomeration Expansion in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Ding, Zhenmin & Yao, Shunbo, 2021. "Ecological effectiveness of payment for ecosystem services to identify incentive priority areas: Sloping land conversion program in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    5. Jun Wang & Lichun Sui & Xiaomei Yang & Zhihua Wang & Dazhuan Ge & Junmei Kang & Fengshuo Yang & Yueming Liu & Bin Liu, 2019. "Economic Globalization Impacts on the Ecological Environment of Inland Developing Countries: A Case Study of Laos from the Perspective of the Land Use/Cover Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Weiguo Fan & Nan Chen & Wei Yao & Mengmeng Meng & Xuechao Wang, 2021. "Integrating Environmental Impact and Ecosystem Services in the Process of Land Resource Capitalization—A Case Study of Land Transfer in Fuping, Hebei," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Shuming Ma & Jie Huang & Yingying Chai, 2021. "Proposing a GEE-Based Spatiotemporally Adjusted Value Transfer Method to Assess Land-Use Changes and Their Impacts on Ecosystem Service Values in the Shenyang Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Aijun Guo & Yongnian Zhang & Fanglei Zhong & Daiwei Jiang, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of Ecosystem Service Value Changes and Their Coordination with Economic Development: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Coria, Jessica & Robinson, Elizabeth & Smith, Henrik G. & Sterner, Thomas, 2012. "Biodiversity Conservation and Ecosystem Services Provision: Tale of Confused Objectives, Multiple Market Failures and Policy Challenges," Working Papers in Economics 546, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    10. Qingfu Liu & Yanyun Zhao & Xuefeng Zhang & Alexander Buyantuev & Jianming Niu & Xiaojiang Wang, 2018. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of Desertification Dynamics and Desertification Effects on Ecosystem Services in the Mu Us Desert in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Manman Han & Min Song, 2020. "Quantifying Ecological Well-Being Loss under Rural–Urban Land Conversion: A Study from Choice Experiments in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Raju Rai & Yili Zhang & Basanta Paudel & Bipin Kumar Acharya & Laxmi Basnet, 2018. "Land Use and Land Cover Dynamics and Assessing the Ecosystem Service Values in the Trans-Boundary Gandaki River Basin, Central Himalayas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Siyuan He & Louise Gallagher & Qingwen Min, 2021. "Examining Linkages among Livelihood Strategies, Ecosystem Services, and Social Well-Being to Improve National Park Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Wei, Hejie & Liu, Huiming & Xu, Zihan & Ren, Jiahui & Lu, Nachuan & Fan, Weiguo & Zhang, Peng & Dong, Xiaobin, 2018. "Linking ecosystem services supply, social demand and human well-being in a typical mountain–oasis–desert area, Xinjiang, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 44-57.
    15. Kocur-Bera, Katarzyna, 2018. "A safe space of rural areas in the context of the occurrence of extreme weather events—A case study covering a part of the Euroregion Baltic," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 518-529.
    16. Clément Feger & Laurent Mermet, 2017. "A blueprint towards accounting for the management of ecosystems," Post-Print hal-01930913, HAL.
    17. Wu, Xutong & Wang, Shuai & Fu, Bojie & Liu, Yu & Zhu, Yuan, 2018. "Land use optimization based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study in the Yanhe watershed," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 303-312.
    18. Arjun Srivathsa & Divya Vasudev & Tanaya Nair & Stotra Chakrabarti & Pranav Chanchani & Ruth DeFries & Arpit Deomurari & Sutirtha Dutta & Dipankar Ghose & Varun R. Goswami & Rajat Nayak & Amrita Neela, 2023. "Prioritizing India’s landscapes for biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(5), pages 568-577, May.
    19. Mohamed A. M. Abd Elbasit & Jasper Knight & Gang Liu & Majed M. Abu-Zreig & Rashid Hasaan, 2021. "Valuation of Ecosystem Services in South Africa, 2001–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Courtney M. Regan & Jeffery D. Connor & Md Sayed Iftekhar, 2023. "An economic assessment of options for operating within plantation forestry water entitlements and tightening cap and trade policy," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(2), pages 303-322, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10550-:d:896404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.