IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10145-d889265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Pattern and Habitat Changes of Amphibian Species in the Priority Area for Biodiversity Conservation in the South Hengduan Mountains

Author

Listed:
  • Nana Shi

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Ningning Guo

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Qi Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Yu Han

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Haiming Yan

    (Hebei Province Collaborative Innovation Center for Sustainable Utilization of Water Resources and Optimization of Industrial Structure, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
    School of Land Science and Space Planning, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Nengwen Xiao

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

Abstract

Amphibian species, as typical objects to study the evolution of vertebrates from aquatic to terrestrial, have faced serious threats in recent decades. This study revealed changes in the spatial distribution pattern of amphibians and their habitats in the priority area for biodiversity conservation in the south of the Hengduan Mountains based on remote sensing and field survey data. Results showed that 71 species of amphibians in 27 genera of 10 families of 2 orders were recorded in the study area, among which 46 species were endemic to China. In particular, there were four national protected species and two newly found species. The amphibian species richness was overall higher in the northern part and lower in the southern part of the study area. There was an obvious variation in the species composition in five major geographic zones in the study area, and the species richness, number, and endemism were all the highest in areas between 2000 and 3000 m. There was a higher abundance of some endemic species, i.e., the Amolops , Bufo , and Scutiger . The main habitats of amphibian species included the forest, farmland, and grassland. There was remarkable fragmentation of these habitats, which was mainly due to land use conversion. There are currently 14 national nature reserves in the study area, covering 39 amphibian species, but there are still 32 amphibian species outsides these nature reserves. It is recommended to carry out long-term located monitoring, improve the existing protection network, and fill the protection gaps to achieve effective protection of these valuable biological resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Nana Shi & Ningning Guo & Qi Wang & Yu Han & Haiming Yan & Nengwen Xiao, 2022. "Spatial Pattern and Habitat Changes of Amphibian Species in the Priority Area for Biodiversity Conservation in the South Hengduan Mountains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10145-:d:889265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norman Myers & Russell A. Mittermeier & Cristina G. Mittermeier & Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca & Jennifer Kent, 2000. "Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6772), pages 853-858, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laxmi D. Bhatta & Sunita Chaudhary & Anju Pandit & Himlal Baral & Partha J. Das & Nigel E. Stork, 2016. "Ecosystem Service Changes and Livelihood Impacts in the Maguri-Motapung Wetlands of Assam, India," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Maeda, Eduardo Eiji & Clark, Barnaby J.F. & Pellikka, Petri & Siljander, Mika, 2010. "Modelling agricultural expansion in Kenya's Eastern Arc Mountains biodiversity hotspot," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(9), pages 609-620, November.
    3. Elisa Barbour & Lara Kueppers, 2012. "Conservation and management of ecological systems in a changing California," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 135-163, March.
    4. van der Hoff, Richard & Nascimento, Nathália & Fabrício-Neto, Ailton & Jaramillo-Giraldo, Carolina & Ambrosio, Geanderson & Arieira, Julia & Afonso Nobre, Carlos & Rajão, Raoni, 2022. "Policy-oriented ecosystem services research on tropical forests in South America: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    5. Brendan Fisher & Stephen Polasky & Thomas Sterner, 2011. "Conservation and Human Welfare: Economic Analysis of Ecosystem Services," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(2), pages 151-159, February.
    6. Pütz, S. & Groeneveld, J. & Alves, L.F. & Metzger, J.P. & Huth, A., 2011. "Fragmentation drives tropical forest fragments to early successional states: A modelling study for Brazilian Atlantic forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(12), pages 1986-1997.
    7. Stephanie D. Maier & Jan Paul Lindner & Javier Francisco, 2019. "Conceptual Framework for Biodiversity Assessments in Global Value Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-34, March.
    8. Poonam Tripathi & Mukund Dev Behera & Partha Sarathi Roy, 2017. "Optimized grid representation of plant species richness in India—Utility of an existing national database in integrated ecological analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Davis, Katrina & Pannell, David J. & Kragt, Marit & Gelcich, Stefan & Schilizzi, Steven, 2014. "Accounting for enforcement is essential to improve the spatial allocation of marine restricted-use zoning systems," Working Papers 195718, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    10. Juliana Silveira dos Santos & Fausto Miziara & Hayla da Silva Fernandes & Renato Cezar Miranda & Rosane Garcia Collevatti, 2021. "Technification in Dairy Farms May Reconcile Habitat Conservation in a Brazilian Savanna Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Ariane Amin & Johanna Choumert, 2015. "Development and biodiversity conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A spatial analysis," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(1), pages 729-744.
    12. Sándor KESZTHELYI & Zsolt PÓNYA & Ferenc PÁL-FÁM, 2017. "Climate-induced seasonal activity and flight period of cerambycid beetles in the Zselic forests, Hungary," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(11), pages 503-510.
    13. Feng Dong & Chih-Ming Hung & Shou-Hsien Li & Xiao-Jun Yang, 2021. "Potential Himalayan community turnover through the Late Pleistocene," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-10, January.
    14. Johnston, Robert J. & Ramachandran, Mahesh & Schultz, Eric T. & Segerson, Kathleen & Besedin, Elena Y., 2011. "Characterizing Spatial Pattern in Ecosystem Service Values when Distance Decay Doesn’t Apply: Choice Experiments and Local Indicators of Spatial Association," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103374, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Tim Theissen & Annette Otte & Rainer Waldhardt, 2022. "High-Mountain Landscape Classification to Analyze Patterns of Land Use and Potential Natural Vegetation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Laurent Debroux & Giuseppe Topa & David Kaimowitz & Alain Karsenty & Terese Hart & Awono Abdon & Fidele Amsini & Conrad Aveling & Alain Bertrand & Mohammed Bekhechi & Carlo Bravi & Eric Chezeaux & Ken, 2007. "Forests in Post- Conflict Democratic Republic of Congo: Analysis of a Priority Agenda," Selected Books, CIRAD, Forest department, UPR40, edition 1, volume 1, number 10.
    17. Amir, Sulfikar, 2023. "Scrutinising Nusantara: the making of an authoritarian city," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119201, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. World Bank, 2017. "Brazil’s INDC Restoration and Reforestation Target," World Bank Publications - Reports 28588, The World Bank Group.
    19. Carlos Cerrejón & Osvaldo Valeria & Jesús Muñoz & Nicole J Fenton, 2022. "Small but visible: Predicting rare bryophyte distribution and richness patterns using remote sensing-based ensembles of small models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Kevin Thellmann & Marc Cotter & Sabine Baumgartner & Anna Treydte & Georg Cadisch & Folkard Asch, 2018. "Tipping Points in the Supply of Ecosystem Services of a Mountainous Watershed in Southeast Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10145-:d:889265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.