IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9368-d876608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Competitive Position of Small Business Furniture Industry Enterprises in Poland in the Context of Sustainable Management: Relationships, Interdependencies, and Effects of Activities

Author

Listed:
  • Ryszard Borowiecki

    (Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland)

  • Barbara Siuta-Tokarska

    (Department of Economics and Organization of Enterprises, Institute of Management, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Krakow, Poland)

  • Mateusz Janas

    (College of Management and Quality Sciences, Institute of Management, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Krakow, Poland)

  • Sylwia Kruk

    (Department of Economics and Organization of Enterprises, Institute of Management, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Krakow, Poland)

  • Paweł Krzemiński

    (Department of Economics and Organization of Enterprises, Institute of Management, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Krakow, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Thier

    (Department of Economics and Organization of Enterprises, Institute of Management, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Krakow, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Żmija

    (Department of Economics and Organization of Enterprises, Institute of Management, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

This publication discusses the issue of small industrial business companies’ competitiveness in the context of managing competitiveness for the purpose of achieving a specific market position and gaining competitive advantage. The objective of this work is to analyse and present the specificity of competitive activities in small business entities and competitiveness management and to identify changes in their competitive position in the different long-term periods analysed. The theoretical part of the work presents a literature review of small business companies’ competitiveness and sustainable management of competitiveness. In this part of the article, the authors present the definition of competitiveness, competitiveness management, and sustainable competitiveness management and present their own model approach based on mind mapping. The study used statistical methods such as taxonomy structure, the Kruskal–Wallis test for independent analyses, and Friedman’s one-way analysis of variance for dependent data. The empirical part presents the authors’ research into the competitive position achieved and declared by companies classified as manufacturers of furniture. The research was divided into two parts: part one refers to qualitative research based on 10 micro businesses; part two presents quantitative research among SMEs. In total, the study covers 304 enterprises, divided into groups by size: 117 micro entities, 100 small entities, and 87 medium companies. The analysed period takes into account the long term, within the years 2008–2020. The main findings of the empirical research are as follows: the competitiveness of small business companies is determined by their qualitative features as well as by the adopted management system, and the sources of competitive advantage in the particular groups of SMEs are not highly diversified by size, with a larger number of medium entities attributing their competitive advantage to qualitative rather than quantitative measures. The achievement of this research objective has allowed for the authors to develop a model of sustainable development of competitiveness in small business companies and present the results of empirical studies. The conducted research is a pioneering contribution to the assessment of the competitive position of the surveyed enterprises and factors influencing their competitiveness in Poland in periods with different external conditions, including the COVID-19 pandemic. Taking into account the nature of empirical research undertaken in the article, it is necessary to point out their pioneering character and the related contribution to the development of science in the field of sustainable management and competitiveness of enterprises from the SME sector, and it is also necessary to fill the existing research gap in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryszard Borowiecki & Barbara Siuta-Tokarska & Mateusz Janas & Sylwia Kruk & Paweł Krzemiński & Agnieszka Thier & Katarzyna Żmija, 2022. "The Competitive Position of Small Business Furniture Industry Enterprises in Poland in the Context of Sustainable Management: Relationships, Interdependencies, and Effects of Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9368-:d:876608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Hitchens & Samarthia Thankappan & Mary Trainor & Jens Clausen & Bruna De Marchi, 2005. "Environmental Performance, Competitiveness And Management Of Small Businesses In Europe," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 96(5), pages 541-557, December.
    2. Nour Nassar & Manuela TvaronaviÄ ienÄ—, 2021. "A systematic theoretical review on sustainable management for green competitiveness," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(2), pages 267-281, June.
    3. Alexander Chursin & Yury Makarov, 2015. "Management of Competitiveness," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-16244-7, September.
    4. Sebastian Ion CEPTUREANU, 2015. "Competitiveness Of Smes," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 5(2), pages 55-67, June.
    5. Yang, Chen-Lung & Lin, Shu-Ping & Chan, Ya-hui & Sheu, Chwen, 2010. "Mediated effect of environmental management on manufacturing competitiveness: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 210-220, January.
    6. Gerusa Giménez Leal & Martí Casadesús Fa & Jaume Valls Pasola, 2003. "Using environmental management systems to increase firms' competitiveness," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 101-110, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandra Gąsior & Jakub Grabowski & Jarosław Ropęga & Anna Walecka, 2022. "Creating a Competitive Advantage for Micro and Small Enterprises Based on Eco-Innovation as a Determinant of the Energy Efficiency of the Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-29, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klassen, Robert D. & Vereecke, Ann, 2012. "Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 103-115.
    2. Magadán-Díaz, Marta & Sotiriadis, Marios & Rivas-García, Jesús, 2019. "Drivers of eco-innovation in the Spanish hospitality industry," MPRA Paper 94090, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Erlantz Allur & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Olivier Boiral & Francesco Testa, 2018. "Quality and Environmental Management Linkage: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Stefan Gold & Stefan Seuring & Philip Beske, 2010. "Sustainable supply chain management and inter‐organizational resources: a literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 230-245, July.
    5. Venugopal Ramachandran, 2011. "Strategic corporate social responsibility: a ‘dynamic capabilities’ perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(5), pages 285-293, September.
    6. Jiafeng Gu, 2021. "Spatial Dynamics between Firm Sales and Environmental Responsibility: The Mediating Role of Corporate Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Graham, Stephanie & Graham, Byron & Holt, Diane, 2018. "The relationship between downstream environmental logistics practices and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 356-365.
    8. Eduard-Gabriel CEPTUREANU, 2016. "Implications of Managerial Reengineering on Change Management," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(2), pages 164-172, May.
    9. Anastasia Christodoulou & Kevin Cullinane, 0. "Potential for, and drivers of, private voluntary initiatives for the decarbonisation of short sea shipping: evidence from a Swedish ferry line," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    10. Gopalakrishnan, Kavitha & Yusuf, Yahaya Y. & Musa, Ahmed & Abubakar, Tijjani & Ambursa, Hafsat M., 2012. "Sustainable supply chain management: A case study of British Aerospace (BAe) Systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 193-203.
    11. Daniel Wojtkowiak & Piotr Cyplik, 2020. "Operational Excellence within Sustainable Development Concept-Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Chen, Lujie & Zhao, Xiande & Tang, Ou & Price, Lydia & Zhang, Shanshan & Zhu, Wenwen, 2017. "Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 73-87.
    13. Andrea Revell & David Stokes & Hsin Chen, 2010. "Small businesses and the environment: turning over a new leaf?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(5), pages 273-288, July.
    14. Runa Sarkar, 2008. "Public policy and corporate environmental behaviour: a broader view," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 281-297, September.
    15. Alisher Khamdamov & Zhiwei Tang & Muhammad Ali Hussain, 2023. "Unpacking Parallel Mediation Processes between Green HRM Practices and Sustainable Environmental Performance: Evidence from Uzbekistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Philipp Dräger & Peter Letmathe, 2023. "Who Drives Circularity?—The Role of Construction Company Employees in Achieving High Circular Economy Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Barbara Siuta-Tokarska & Justyna Juchniewicz & Małgorzata Kowalik & Agnieszka Thier & Elwira Gross-Gołacka, 2023. "Family SMEs in Poland and Their Strategies: The Multi-Criteria Analysis in Varied Socio-Economic Circumstances of Their Development in Context of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Philip Beske & Julia Koplin & Stefan Seuring, 2008. "The use of environmental and social standards by German first‐tier suppliers of the Volkswagen AG," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 63-75, March.
    19. Anastasia Christodoulou & Kevin Cullinane, 2021. "Potential for, and drivers of, private voluntary initiatives for the decarbonisation of short sea shipping: evidence from a Swedish ferry line," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 632-654, December.
    20. Mike Danilovic & Marleen Hensbergen & Maya Hoveskog & Liudmila Zadayannaya, 2015. "Exploring Diffusion and Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 129-141, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9368-:d:876608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.