IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8663-d863444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Farm Income through Boundary Plantation of Poplar (Populus deltoides) : An Economic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • S. B. Chavan

    (ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati 413115, India
    Department of Forestry, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India)

  • R. S. Dhillon

    (Department of Forestry, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India)

  • Chhavi Sirohi

    (Department of Forestry, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India)

  • A. Keerthika

    (ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station (RRS), Pali 306401, India)

  • Sushil Kumari

    (Department of Forestry, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India)

  • K. K. Bharadwaj

    (Department of Forestry, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India)

  • Dinesh Jinger

    (ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, RC, Anand 388306, India)

  • Vijaysinha Kakade

    (ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati 413115, India)

  • A. R. Chichaghare

    (Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur 680656, India)

  • Tarek K. Zin El-Abedin

    (Department of Agriculture & Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21545, Egypt)

  • Eman A. Mahmoud

    (Department of Food Industries, Faculty of Agriculture, Damietta University, Damietta 34511, Egypt)

  • Rayan Casini

    (College of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, 2121 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA)

  • Hanoor Sharma

    (Microbiology and Immunology, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, USA)

  • Hosam O. Elansary

    (Plant Production Department, College of Food & Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Kowiyou Yessoufou

    (Department of Geography, Environmental Management, and Energy Studies, University of Johannesburg, APK Campus, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

Abstract

Poplar is popular among farmers and planted widely in the form of block and boundary systems. The preferences of farmers are shifting much more towards bund plantations due to their smaller yield reductions and can take up kharif and rabi crops till rotation. As for boundary plantations, farmers tend to grow trees in any direction without concern for yield reduction or profitability. Against this background, an experiment was designed by planting poplar at 2 m intervals in East–West (E–W) and North–South (N–S) directions during 2008 to determine the production potential and economic viability of boundary plantations and their effect on sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor ) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) crop rotations till harvesting of the trees. The experiment comprised three variables: stand age (years); four aspects (northern and southern E–W rows, eastern and western N–S rows; these four aspects are considered by dividing the tree lines); and six distances from tree the lines (0–3, 3–6, 6–9, 9–12, 12–15, 15–18 m and a control). A split-split plot design with three replicates was used. A significant reduction of fodder biomass of sorghum and wheat yield was observed up to 9 m distant from the tree line: the reduction was 10 to 60% for the kharif season and 7.2 to 29.5% for rabi crops from the second year to eight years after planting, respectively. Interestingly, the poplar boundary plantation had a favorable microclimatic effect from 9 to 15 m distance from the tree line, which increased crop yields compared with the control. The total dry wood production of poplar in the E–W direction (166.99 mg ha −1 ) was almost two times more than production for the N–S direction (82.62 mg ha −1 ) at 8 years of rotation. The economic analysis of this study concluded that an E–W boundary plantation of poplars exhibited the maximum net returns of INR 549,367 ha −1 , a net present value of INR 222,951 ha −1 , a BC ratio of 1:1.65, an IRR of 85% and an LEV of INR 1,220,337 ha −1 . Therefore, it is concluded that the intercropping of a sorghum-wheat crop rotation in E–W boundary plantations was more beneficial for enhancing farm income over traditional agriculture in north India.

Suggested Citation

  • S. B. Chavan & R. S. Dhillon & Chhavi Sirohi & A. Keerthika & Sushil Kumari & K. K. Bharadwaj & Dinesh Jinger & Vijaysinha Kakade & A. R. Chichaghare & Tarek K. Zin El-Abedin & Eman A. Mahmoud & Rayan, 2022. "Enhancing Farm Income through Boundary Plantation of Poplar (Populus deltoides) : An Economic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8663-:d:863444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8663/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8663/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raddad, E.Y. & Luukkanen, O., 2007. "The influence of different Acacia senegal agroforestry systems on soil water and crop yields in clay soils of the Blue Nile region, Sudan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 61-72, January.
    2. Louis Verchot & Meine Noordwijk & Serigne Kandji & Tom Tomich & Chin Ong & Alain Albrecht & Jens Mackensen & Cynthia Bantilan & K. Anupama & Cheryl Palm, 2007. "Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 901-918, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Datta, Pritha & Behera, Bhagirath & Rahut, Dil Bahadur, 2024. "Assessing the role of agriculture-forestry-livestock nexus in improving farmers' food security in South Asia: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel Kasongo Yakusu & Joris Van Acker & Hans Van de Vyver & Nils Bourland & José Mbifo Ndiapo & Théophile Besango Likwela & Michel Lokonda Wa Kipifo & Amand Mbuya Kankolongo & Jan Van den Bulcke &, 2023. "Ground-based climate data show evidence of warming and intensification of the seasonal rainfall cycle during the 1960–2020 period in Yangambi, central Congo Basin," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(10), pages 1-28, October.
    2. Trinh, Thoai Quang & Rañola, Roberto F. & Camacho, Leni D. & Simelton, Elisabeth, 2018. "Determinants of farmers’ adaptation to climate change in agricultural production in the central region of Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 224-231.
    3. Thomas A. Tsalis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2017. "Assessing the Effects of Climate Change Regulations on the Business Community: A System Dynamic Approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 826-843, September.
    4. Mariana Raposo & Paulo Canaveira & Tiago Domingos, 2025. "Estimating Soil Carbon Sequestration Potential in Portuguese Agricultural Soils Through Land-Management and Land-Use Changes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, February.
    5. André Vizinho & David Avelar & Cristina Branquinho & Tiago Capela Lourenço & Silvia Carvalho & Alice Nunes & Leonor Sucena-Paiva & Hugo Oliveira & Ana Lúcia Fonseca & Filipe Duarte Santos & Maria José, 2021. "Framework for Climate Change Adaptation of Agriculture and Forestry in Mediterranean Climate Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-33, February.
    6. Quandt, A. & Kimathi, Y.A., . "Adapting livelihoods to floods and droughts in arid Kenya: Local perspectives and insights," African Journal of Rural Development (AFJRD), AFrican Journal of Rural Development (AFJRD), vol. 1(01).
    7. Mst. Sohela Afroz & S. M. Kamran Ashraf & Md. Tanbheer Rana & Saleha Khatun Ripta & Sumaiya Binte Rahman Asha & S. M. Sanjida Tasnim Urmi & Kimihiko Hyakumura & Kazi Kamrul Islam, 2025. "Agroforestry: A Sustainable Land-Use Practice for Enhancing Productivity and Carbon Sequestration in Madhupur Sal Forest, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Raúl Córdova & Nicholas J. Hogarth & Markku Kanninen, 2019. "Mountain Farming Systems’ Exposure and Sensitivity to Climate Change and Variability: Agroforestry and Conventional Agriculture Systems Compared in Ecuador’s Indigenous Territory of Kayambi People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-30, May.
    9. Unai Pascual & Roberto Martínez-Espiñeira, 2009. "The effect of environmental change and price policies on livelihoods in tropical agroforestry systems," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(3), pages 433-446.
    10. Lenka Soták-Benedeková & Jana Rybárová & Dana Tometzová & Andrea Seňová & Radim Rybár, 2025. "Comprehensive Analysis of Rural Tourism Development: Historical Evolution, Current Trends, and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-41, January.
    11. Md. Moshiur Rahman & Tapan Kumar Chakraborty & Abdullah Al Mamun & Victor Kiaya, 2023. "Land- and Water-Based Adaptive Farming Practices to Cope with Waterlogging in Variably Elevated Homesteads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Mustafa Hakkı Aydoğdu & Mehmet Reşit Sevinç & Mehmet Cançelik & Hatice Parlakçı Doğan & Zeliha Şahin, 2020. "Determination of Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Agricultural Land Use in the GAP-Harran Plain of Turkey," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Francisco X. Aguilar & Dienda Hendrawan & Zhen Cai & James M. Roshetko & Judith Stallmann, 2022. "Smallholder farmer resilience to water scarcity," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2543-2576, February.
    14. Eva Petrová & Tomáš Štofa & Michal Šoltés, 2021. "Exploration of the Factors that Influence the Implementation of Environmental Management Systems—The Case of Slovakia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Meine van Noordwijk & Richard Coe & Fergus L. Sinclair & Eike Luedeling & Jules Bayala & Catherine W. Muthuri & Peter Cooper & Roeland Kindt & Lalisa Duguma & Christine Lamanna & Peter A. Minang, 2021. "Climate change adaptation in and through agroforestry: four decades of research initiated by Peter Huxley," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1-33, June.
    16. Waldén, Pirjetta & Eronen, Mari & Kaseva, Janne & Negash, Mesele & Kahiluoto, Helena, 2024. "Determinants of the economy in multistrata agroforestry in Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Tiziana Pagnani & Elisabetta Gotor & Francesco Caracciolo, 2021. "Adaptive strategies enhance smallholders’ livelihood resilience in Bihar, India," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(2), pages 419-437, April.
    18. Alcade C. Segnon & Enoch G. Achigan-Dako & Orou G. Gaoue & Adam Ahanchédé, 2015. "Farmer’s Knowledge and Perception of Diversified Farming Systems in Sub-Humid and Semi-Arid Areas in Benin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Chen, Yong & Marek, Gary W. & Marek, Thomas H. & Moorhead, Jerry E. & Heflin, Kevin R. & Brauer, David K. & Gowda, Prasanna H. & Srinivasan, Raghavan, 2019. "Simulating the impacts of climate change on hydrology and crop production in the Northern High Plains of Texas using an improved SWAT model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 13-24.
    20. Schaafsma, Marije & Ferrini, Silvia & Turner, R. Kerry, 2019. "Assessing smallholder preferences for incentivised climate-smart agriculture using a discrete choice experiment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8663-:d:863444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.