IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8361-d858281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impact Evaluation of University Integrated Waste Management System in India Using Life Cycle Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Amit Kumar Jaglan

    (Amity School of Architecture & Planning, Amity University, Noida 201313, India)

  • Venkata Ravi Sankar Cheela

    (Department of Civil Engineering, MVGR College of Engineering (A), Vizianagaram 535005, India)

  • Mansi Vinaik

    (School of Management and Liberal Studies, The NorthCap University, Gurugram 122017, India)

  • Brajesh Dubey

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, India)

Abstract

Decarbonization of university campuses by integrating scientific waste approaches and circular economy principles is the need-of-the-hour. Universities, the maximum energetic corporations and places for clinical studies and social activities, have a duty to assemble low-carbon campuses and play a vital function in lowering CO 2 emissions. An environmental life cycle assessment was conducted to compare proposed municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment systems with the existing system in the residential university campus (RUC) in Kharagpur, West Bengal (India). The results show the existing MSW disposal practice in RUC (baseline scenario has the highest GWP (1388 kg CO 2 eq), which can potentially be reduced by adopting integrated waste management system with source segregation as represented in futuristic scenarios (S2—50% sorting) and (S3—90% sorting)). Compared to S1, GHG emission was reduced by 50.9% in S2 and by 86.5% in S3. Adopting anaerobic digestion and engineered landfill without energy recovery offsets the environmental emissions and contributes to significant environmental benefits in terms of ecological footprints. Capital goods play a pivotal role in mitigation the environmental emissions. The shift towards S2 and S3 requires infrastructure for waste collection and sorting will contribute to reduction of associated environmental costs in the long-term.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit Kumar Jaglan & Venkata Ravi Sankar Cheela & Mansi Vinaik & Brajesh Dubey, 2022. "Environmental Impact Evaluation of University Integrated Waste Management System in India Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8361-:d:858281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8361/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8361/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chatterjee, Biswabandhu & Mazumder, Debabrata, 2019. "Role of stage-separation in the ubiquitous development of Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 439-469.
    2. Altaf Hussain Kanhar & Shaoqing Chen & Fei Wang, 2020. "Incineration Fly Ash and Its Treatment to Possible Utilization: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-35, December.
    3. Zhou, Hewen & Yang, Qing & Gul, Eid & Shi, Mengmeng & Li, Jiashuo & Yang, Minjiao & Yang, Haiping & Chen, Bin & Zhao, Haibo & Yan, Yunjun & Erdoğan, Güneş & Bartocci, Pietro & Fantozzi, Francesco, 2021. "Decarbonizing university campuses through the production of biogas from food waste: An LCA analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 565-578.
    4. Lukman, Rebeka & Tiwary, Abhishek & Azapagic, Adisa, 2009. "Towards greening a university campus: The case of the University of Maribor, Slovenia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(11), pages 639-644.
    5. Przemysław Seruga & Małgorzata Krzywonos & Anna Seruga & Łukasz Niedźwiecki & Halina Pawlak-Kruczek & Agnieszka Urbanowska, 2020. "Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Separate Collected vs. Mechanical Segregated Organic Fractions of Municipal Solid Waste as Feedstock," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Venkata Ravi Sankar Cheela & Michele John & Wahidul K. Biswas & Brajesh Dubey, 2021. "Environmental Impact Evaluation of Current Municipal Solid Waste Treatments in India Using Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geovana Dagostim Savi-Bortolotto & Ana Carolina Pescador & Tiago Bortolotto & Camila Garbin Sandi & Alícia Viana de Oliveira & Matheus Rodrigues Pereira Mendes & Kátia Cilene Rodrigues Madruga & Afons, 2025. "Fostering a Sustainable Campus: A Successful Selective Waste Collection Initiative in a Brazilian University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Eloy Mondragón-Zarza & Isis Neftaly Martínez-Morales & María del Consuelo Hernández-Berriel & Elena Regla Rosa Domínguez & Samantha Eugenia Cruz-Sotelo & Sara Ojeda-Benítez, 2025. "Environmental Impact of Uncontrolled Sites in the Central Region of Mexico: A Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-32, October.
    3. Denner Deda & Helena Gervásio & Margarida J. Quina, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis and Benchmarking of Life Cycle Assessment of Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Stephen Oladipo & Yanxia Sun & Abraham Amole, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of the Impact of Clustering Methods and Parameters on Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Models for Electricity Consumption Prediction during COVID-19," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Arias, Ana & Feijoo, Gumersindo & Moreira, Maria Teresa & Tukker, Arnold & Cucurachi, Stefano, 2025. "Advancing waste valorization and end-of-life strategies in the bioeconomy through multi-criteria approaches and the safe and sustainable by design framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    6. Uvin Eksith Senadheera & Jasintha Jayasanka & Dhanushka Udayanga & Choolaka Hewawasam & Buddhika Amila & Yuya Takimoto & Masashi Hatamoto & Nakayama Tadachika, 2024. "Beyond Composting Basics: A Sustainable Development Goals—Oriented Strategic Guidance to IoT Integration for Composting in Modern Urban Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-28, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Venkata Ravi Sankar Cheela & Michele John & Wahidul K. Biswas & Brajesh Dubey, 2021. "Environmental Impact Evaluation of Current Municipal Solid Waste Treatments in India Using Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Dejene Tsegaye & Mohammed Mazharuddin Khan & Seyoum Leta, 2023. "Optimization of Operating Parameters for Two-Phase Anaerobic Digestion Treating Slaughterhouse Wastewater for Biogas Production: Focus on Hydrolytic–Acidogenic Phase," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Thobile Zikhathile & Harrison Atagana & Joseph Bwapwa & David Sawtell, 2022. "A Review of the Impact That Healthcare Risk Waste Treatment Technologies Have on the Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Tian, Xueyu & You, Fengqi, 2024. "Broaden sustainable design and optimization of decarbonized campus Energy systems with scope 3 emissions accounting and social ramification analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    5. Aragon-Briceño, Christian & Pożarlik, Artur & Bramer, Eddy & Brem, Gerrit & Wang, Shule & Wen, Yuming & Yang, Weihong & Pawlak-Kruczek, Halina & Niedźwiecki, Łukasz & Urbanowska, Agnieszka & Mościcki,, 2022. "Integration of hydrothermal carbonization treatment for water and energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste digestate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 577-591.
    6. Hollas, C.E. & Bolsan, A.C. & Chini, A. & Venturin, B. & Bonassa, G. & Cândido, D. & Antes, F.G. & Steinmetz, R.L.R. & Prado, N.V. & Kunz, A., 2021. "Effects of swine manure storage time on solid-liquid separation and biogas production: A life-cycle assessment approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Theresa Menzel & Peter Neubauer & Stefan Junne, 2020. "Role of Microbial Hydrolysis in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, October.
    8. Jinming Liu & Changhao Zeng & Na Wang & Jianfei Shi & Bo Zhang & Changyu Liu & Yong Sun, 2021. "Rapid Biochemical Methane Potential Evaluation of Anaerobic Co-Digestion Feedstocks Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, S.R., 2020. "Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Przemysław Seruga & Małgorzata Krzywonos & Emilia den Boer & Łukasz Niedźwiecki & Agnieszka Urbanowska & Halina Pawlak-Kruczek, 2022. "Anaerobic Digestion as a Component of Circular Bioeconomy—Case Study Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Zamri, M.F.M.A. & Hasmady, Saiful & Akhiar, Afifi & Ideris, Fazril & Shamsuddin, A.H. & Mofijur, M. & Fattah, I. M. Rizwanul & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    12. Elena Rossi & Isabella Pecorini & Renato Iannelli, 2022. "Multilinear Regression Model for Biogas Production Prediction from Dry Anaerobic Digestion of OFMSW," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Przemysław Seruga, 2021. "The Municipal Solid Waste Management System with Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-9, April.
    14. Negri, Camilla & Ricci, Marina & Zilio, Massimo & D'Imporzano, Giuliana & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie & Adani, Fabrizio, 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    15. Laura Ferrans & Alexander Nilsson & Frank Schmieder & Divya Pal & Mahboubeh Rahmati-Abkenar & Marcia Marques & William Hogland, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment of Management Scenarios for Dredged Sediments: Environmental Impacts Caused during Landfilling and Soil Conditioning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Walter Leal Filho & Priscilla Cristina Cabral Ribeiro & Andréia Faraoni Freitas Setti & Fardous Mohammad Safiul Azam & Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Julen Castillo-Apraiz & Unai Tamayo & Pinar Gokcin Özuyar, 2024. "Toward food waste reduction at universities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 16585-16606, July.
    17. Liqun Chang & Wei Wang & Luyang Zhang & Jing Lv & Yunlai Fu & Xianhui Hu, 2025. "Multi-Temperature Synchronous Prediction of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Based on a Non-Stationary Crossformer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, February.
    18. D'Aquino, Camila A. & Santos, Samantha C. & Sauer, Ildo L., 2022. "Biogas as an alternative source of decentralized bioelectricity for large waste producers: An assessment framework at the University of São Paulo," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    19. Tomasz Kalak, 2023. "Potential Use of Industrial Biomass Waste as a Sustainable Energy Source in the Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    20. Tirthankar Mukherjee & Eric Trably & Prasad Kaparaju, 2023. "Critical Assessment of Hydrogen and Methane Production from 1G and 2G Sugarcane Processing Wastes Using One-Stage and Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8361-:d:858281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.