IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7846-d849193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Sport Coaching a Social Sustainable Profession for Women? Analysing the Experiences of Women Coaches in Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Solanas

    (Grup d’Investigació Social i Educativa de l’Activitat Física i l’Esport (GISEAFE), Institut Nacional d’Educacíó Física de Catalunya (INEFC), Universitat de Barcelona, Avinguda de l’Estadi, 12-22, 08030 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Ingrid Hinojosa-Alcalde

    (Grup d’Investigació Social i Educativa de l’Activitat Física i l’Esport (GISEAFE), Institut Nacional d’Educacíó Física de Catalunya (INEFC), Universitat de Barcelona, Avinguda de l’Estadi, 12-22, 08030 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Anna Vilanova

    (Grup d’Investigació Social i Educativa de l’Activitat Física i l’Esport (GISEAFE), Institut Nacional d’Educacíó Física de Catalunya (INEFC), Universitat de Barcelona, Avinguda de l’Estadi, 12-22, 08030 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Susanna Soler

    (Grup d’Investigació Social i Educativa de l’Activitat Física i l’Esport (GISEAFE), Institut Nacional d’Educacíó Física de Catalunya (INEFC), Universitat de Barcelona, Avinguda de l’Estadi, 12-22, 08030 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

While there are several studies showing the importance of social sustainability in different settings (e.g., Democracy and Governance: the Role of Sport Governing Bodies, urban planning, architecture) there is a lack of studies investigating social sustainability in the sports coaching profession, and even less research has specifically addressed women coaches. Using Barron and Gauntlett’s model of social sustainability (2002), the purpose of this study was to analyze the women coaches’ experiences of their profession and the extent to which it is a sustainable livelihood for women coaches. Semi-structured interviews with 20 women coaches were conducted from a variety of sports and performance levels. From a social sustainability perspective, the women coaches’ experiences were analyzed using Barron and Gauntlett’s principles of equity, diversity, interconnectedness, and democracy and governance to ascertain their quality of life. Our findings reveal that women coaches face multiple barriers and difficult working conditions in their profession, yet they continue to be committed to coaching largely because of the strong positive interpersonal relationships and social interactions they have with their sporting community. This study shines a light on the extent to which coaching is a livable and sustainable profession for women coaches today and highlights the importance of considering social sustainability principles to improve the experiences of women in the sports coaching profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Solanas & Ingrid Hinojosa-Alcalde & Anna Vilanova & Susanna Soler, 2022. "Is Sport Coaching a Social Sustainable Profession for Women? Analysing the Experiences of Women Coaches in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7846-:d:849193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7846/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7846/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dixon, Marlene A. & Bruening, Jennifer E., 2005. "Perspectives on Work-Family Conflict in Sport: An Integrated Approach," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 227-253, November.
    2. Efrat Eizenberg & Yosef Jabareen, 2017. "Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Marlene A. Dixon & Jennifer E. Bruening, 2005. "Perspectives on Work-Family Conflict in Sport: An Integrated Approach," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 227-253, September.
    4. Beate Littig & Erich Griessler, 2005. "Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1/2), pages 65-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jubril Olakitan Atanda & Ayşe Öztürk, 2020. "Social criteria of sustainable development in relation to green building assessment tools," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 61-87, January.
    2. Ümran Duman & Buket Asilsoy, 2022. "Developing an Evidence-Based Framework of Universal Design in the Context of Sustainable Urban Planning in Northern Nicosia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-31, October.
    3. Laura Beaudin & Aziz N. Berdiev, 2024. "Does Gender Matter? Examining the Impact of Coach Gender on Team Success: Evidence from the NCAA Division I Basketball Tournament," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 50(2), pages 135-153, April.
    4. Lucia Corsini & James Moultrie, 2019. "Design for Social Sustainability: Using Digital Fabrication in the Humanitarian and Development Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Francesco Polese & Carmen Gallucci & Luca Carrubbo & Rosalia Santulli, 2021. "Predictive Maintenance as a Driver for Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from a Public-Private Co-Financed R&D Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Massoomeh Hedayati Marzbali & Aldrin Abdullah & Mohammad Javad Maghsoodi Tilaki & Mina Safizadeh, 2021. "Moving the 2030 Agenda Ahead: Exploring the Role of Multiple Mediators toward Perceived Environment and Social Sustainability in Residential Neighbourhoods," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Jean Moussa Kourouma & Concillia Monde & Darius Phiri & Stephen Syampungani, 2023. "Community‐centred approach for assessing social sustainability in mining regions: A case study of Chingola district, Zambia," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 3102-3127, August.
    8. Ellinor Isgren & Stefano B. Longo, 2024. "Social sustainability: more confusion than clarity," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 820-825, December.
    9. Anh M. Ly & Michael R. Cope, 2023. "New Conceptual Model of Social Sustainability: Review from Past Concepts and Ideas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Bonnie Averbuch & Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe & Chris Kjeldsen, 2022. "Using fuzzy cognitive mapping and social capital to explain differences in sustainability perceptions between farmers in the northeast US and Denmark," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 435-453, March.
    11. Lie Ma & Qiu Xie & Shiying Shi & Xiaosu Ye & Aifeng Zhao, 2017. "Regional Maldistribution of China’s Hospitals Based on Their Structural System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Di Tommaso, Marco R. & Prodi, Elena & Pollio, Chiara & Barbieri, Elisa, 2023. "Conceptualizing and measuring “industry resilience”: Composite indicators for postshock industrial policy decision-making," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Doherty, Alison, 2013. "Investing in sport management: The value of good theory," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 5-11.
    14. Nejc Brezovar & Tatjana Stanimirovic, 2022. "Sustainability aspects of participatory budgeting at the municipal level in Slovenia," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 46(4), pages 569-589.
    15. Ankitha Vijayakumar & Muhammad Nateque Mahmood & Argaw Gurmu & Imriyas Kamardeen & Shafiq Alam, 2024. "Social sustainability assessment of road infrastructure: a systematic literature review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1039-1069, April.
    16. Robin Hogrefe & Sabine Bohnet-Joschko, 2023. "The Social Dimension of Corporate Sustainability: Review of an Evolving Research Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Zia Ullah & Mohammed Ali Bait Ali Sulaiman & Syed Babar Ali & Naveed Ahmad & Miklas Scholz & Heesup Han, 2021. "The Effect of Work Safety on Organizational Social Sustainability Improvement in the Healthcare Sector: The Case of a Public Sector Hospital in Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Slavica Stamatovic Vuckovic & Kosara Kujundzic, 2023. "Strategies for Realization of Socially Sustainable Residential Buildings: Experts’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-31, April.
    19. Fatmaelzahraa Hussein & John Stephens & Reena Tiwari, 2020. "Memory for Social Sustainability: Recalling Cultural Memories in Zanqit Alsitat Historical Street Market, Alexandria, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Zia Ullah & Susana Álvarez-Otero & Mohammed Ali Bait Ali Sulaiman & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Naveed Ahmad & Miklas Scholz & Khaoula Omhand, 2021. "Achieving Organizational Social Sustainability through Electronic Performance Appraisal Systems: The Moderating Influence of Transformational Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7846-:d:849193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.