IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6892-d832022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Development Priority of Smart Shipping Items—Focusing on the Expert Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Young-Gyun Ahn

    (Maritime Policy Research Department, Korea Maritime Institute, Busan 49111, Korea)

  • Taeil Kim

    (Maritime Policy Research Department, Korea Maritime Institute, Busan 49111, Korea)

  • Bo-Ram Kim

    (Logistics and Maritime Industry Research Department, Korea Maritime Institute, Busan 49111, Korea)

  • Min-Kyu Lee

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48547, Korea)

Abstract

As smart technology in the shipping industry accelerates, demand for technology development, which aims to increase competitiveness by utilizing the latest smart technologies, is increasing. The shipping industry in each country is pushing for developing its smart technologies at a rapid pace, and it is urgent to prioritize the demand for smart technologies in the shipping industry for sustainable industry growth. The purpose of the present study is to verify the importance and urgency of smart technologies in the shipping industry, and the present study surveys 74 domestic and foreign shipping industry officials, covering shipping companies, brokers, governments, etc. The importance and urgency of each smart technology item in the shipping industry are questioned in a survey. It is necessary to focus investment on specific smart shipping items under a limited budget, and, since the priorities presented in this study were derived through comprehensive collection of opinions from 74 shipping experts, the priorities presented in this study are expected to be effective reference values when implementing sustainable shipping investment policies. According to an interview analysis on importance and urgency, both “autonomous ships” and “blockchain” items show high importance and urgency. Since both importance and urgency are high, strategic priorities are the highest, and it is expected to contribute effectively to enhancing the smartness of the shipping industry when it focuses its investment capabilities in those fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Young-Gyun Ahn & Taeil Kim & Bo-Ram Kim & Min-Kyu Lee, 2022. "A Study on the Development Priority of Smart Shipping Items—Focusing on the Expert Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6892-:d:832022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6892/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6892/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sikorski, Janusz J. & Haughton, Joy & Kraft, Markus, 2017. "Blockchain technology in the chemical industry: Machine-to-machine electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 234-246.
    2. Balci, Gökcay, 2021. "Digitalization in container shipping: Do perception and satisfaction regarding digital products in a non-technology industry affect overall customer loyalty?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Barbara Brenner, 2018. "Transformative Sustainable Business Models in the Light of the Digital Imperative—A Global Business Economics Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Meng, Qiang & Zhao, Hui & Wang, Yadong, 2019. "Revenue management for container liner shipping services: Critical review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 280-292.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fa Zhang & Yimiao Gu, 2022. "Approach to an Equivalent Freight-Based Sustainable Joint-Quotation Strategy for Shipping Blockchain Alliance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-28, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alkaraan, Fadi & Elmarzouky, Mahmoud & Hussainey, Khaled & Venkatesh, V.G., 2023. "Sustainable strategic investment decision-making practices in UK companies: The influence of governance mechanisms on synergy between industry 4.0 and circular economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Lazar Gitelman & Mikhail Kozhevnikov & Olga Ryzhuk, 2019. "Advance Management Education for Power-Engineering and Industry of the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Tandon, Anushree & Kaur, Puneet & Mäntymäki, Matti & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "Blockchain applications in management: A bibliometric analysis and literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Byeongtae Ahn, 2022. "Implementation and Early Adoption of an Ethereum-Based Electronic Voting System for the Prevention of Fraudulent Voting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Alaa Abdelshafie & May Salah & Tomaž Kramberger & Dejan Dragan, 2022. "Repositioning and Optimal Re-Allocation of Empty Containers: A Review of Methods, Models, and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Shengmin Tan & Xu Wang & Chuanwen Jiang, 2019. "Privacy-Preserving Energy Scheduling for ESCOs Based on Energy Blockchain Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Broccardo, Laura & Zicari, Adrián & Jabeen, Fauzia & Bhatti, Zeeshan A., 2023. "How digitalization supports a sustainable business model: A literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Wang, Lu & Gu, Wei & Wu, Zhi & Qiu, Haifeng & Pan, Guangsheng, 2020. "Non-cooperative game-based multilateral contract transactions in power-heating integrated systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    9. Yáñez-Valdés, Claudia & Guerrero, Maribel & Barros-Celume, Sebastián & Ibáñez, María J., 2023. "Winds of change due to global lockdowns: Refreshing digital social entrepreneurship research paradigm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    10. Yuki Matsuda & Yuto Yamazaki & Hiromu Oki & Yasuhiro Takeda & Daishi Sagawa & Kenji Tanaka, 2021. "Demonstration of Blockchain Based Peer to Peer Energy Trading System with Real-Life Used PHEV and HEMS Charge Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-12, November.
    11. Ciampi, Francesco & Faraoni, Monica & Ballerini, Jacopo & Meli, Francesco, 2022. "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Chand Bhatt, Priyanka & Kumar, Vimal & Lu, Tzu-Chuen & Daim, Tugrul, 2021. "Technology convergence assessment: Case of blockchain within the IR 4.0 platform," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Guilherme Luz Tortorella & Flavio S. Fogliatto & Michel J. Anzanello & Alejandro Mac Cawley Vergara & Roberto Vassolo & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, 2023. "Modeling the impact of industry 4.0 base technologies on the development of organizational learning capabilities," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1091-1104, September.
    14. Jian Wang & Qianggang Wang & Niancheng Zhou & Yuan Chi, 2017. "A Novel Electricity Transaction Mode of Microgrids Based on Blockchain and Continuous Double Auction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Anna Adamik & Michał Nowicki & Andrius Puksas, 2022. "Energy Oriented Concepts and Other SMART WORLD Trends as Game Changers of Co-Production—Reality or Future?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-38, June.
    16. Silvia H. Bonilla & Helton R. O. Silva & Marcia Terra da Silva & Rodrigo Franco Gonçalves & José B. Sacomano, 2018. "Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Bart Van Riessen & Judith Mulder & Rudy R. Negenborn & Rommert Dekker, 2021. "Revenue management with two fare classes in synchromodal container transportation," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 623-662, September.
    18. Andreja Pucihar, 2020. "The digital transformation journey: content analysis of Electronic Markets articles and Bled eConference proceedings from 2012 to 2019," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 29-37, March.
    19. Sun, Qinghe & Meng, Qiang & Chou, Mabel C., 2021. "Optimizing voyage charterparty (VCP) arrangement: Laytime negotiation and operations coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 263-270.
    20. Seong-Kyu Kim & Jun-Ho Huh, 2018. "A Study on the Improvement of Smart Grid Security Performance and Blockchain Smart Grid Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6892-:d:832022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.