IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6439-d823395.html

Social Innovation in Rural Areas of the European Union Learnings from Neo-Endogenous Development Projects in Italy and Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Navarro-Valverde

    (Department of Human Geography, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Marilena Labianca

    (Department of Economics, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy)

  • Eugenio Cejudo-García

    (Department of Human Geography, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Stefano De Rubertis

    (Department of Economics, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

Abstract

Within the framework of the LEADER approach to rural development applied in rural areas of the European Union, a high degree of social innovation (SI) has been achieved with the support of public–private partnerships. This research analyzes the different forms of SI achieved in specific projects in marginal rural areas facing depopulation. These initiatives make important, sometimes intangible, contributions to rural society, which are not sufficiently valued in rural development practice. Using an exploratory qualitative methodology, we made a selection of projects carried out in rural areas of Spain and Italy by searching for specific keywords (“innovation”, “entrepreneurship”, and “LEADER”) in the European Network of Rural Development database. According to the typology of promoters, we considered Transnational Cooperation Projects promoted by various Local Action Groups (LAGs), by public sector initiative and by private promoters. In-depth interviews were also conducted. The main findings include: the crucial role played by local leaders, social enterprises and LAGs in overcoming resistance and reluctance amongst the local community to participate in and support rural development projects; the importance of creating collective learning processes; the complexity of the network affects the number of contributions; the need for long-term continuity of processes and projects, and the importance of combining exogenous and endogenous development and knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Navarro-Valverde & Marilena Labianca & Eugenio Cejudo-García & Stefano De Rubertis, 2022. "Social Innovation in Rural Areas of the European Union Learnings from Neo-Endogenous Development Projects in Italy and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6439-:d:823395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Navarro Francisco & Labianca Marilena & Cejudo Eugenio & de Rubertis Stefano & Salento Angelo & Maroto Juan Carlos & Belliggiano Angelo, 2018. "Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 107-126, March.
    2. Ana-Maria Opria & Lucian Roșu & Corneliu Iațu, 2021. "LEADER Program—An Inclusive or Selective Instrument for the Development of Rural Space in Romania?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Carla Barlagne & Mariana Melnykovych & David Miller & Richard J. Hewitt & Laura Secco & Elena Pisani & Maria Nijnik, 2021. "What Are the Impacts of Social Innovation? A Synthetic Review and Case Study of Community Forestry in the Scottish Highlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Florian Ahlmeyer & Kati Volgmann, 2023. "What Can We Expect for the Development of Rural Areas in Europe?—Trends of the Last Decade and Their Opportunities for Rural Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Liliane Moreira Nery & Darllan Collins Silva & Débora Zumkeller Sabonaro, 2024. "Agriculture technology transfer: A multicriteria analysis for decision making," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 15515-15533, June.
    3. Mert Abay & Sedef Akgüngör, 2024. "Technological paths and smart specialization: analysis of regional entry and exit in Turkey," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 45-84, March.
    4. Nor Afifah Yusof & Mohd Noor Hidayat Jimainal & Rudy Ansar & Brahim Chekima & Ng Yen Phin & Shalahuddin Shalahuddin, 2025. "The Moderating Role of Socio-Economic Status in Digital Marketing Adoption and Agribusiness Sustainability among Rural Youth," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 813-824, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tulla Antoni F., 2019. "Sustainable Rural Development Requires Value-Added Activities Linked with Comparative Advantage: The Case of the Catalan Pyrenees," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 229-256, June.
    2. Francisco Martínez Arroyo & Hugo Sacristán López & Juan Sebastián Castillo-Valero & María Carmen García-Cortijo, 2022. "Rural development programmes: Lessons learnt, and knowledge advancement. A case study in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain)," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(10), pages 393-402.
    3. Winkel, Georg & Lovrić, Marko & Muys, Bart & Katila, Pia & Lundhede, Thomas & Pecurul, Mireia & Pettenella, Davide & Pipart, Nathalie & Plieninger, Tobias & Prokofieva, Irina & Parra, Constanza & Pülz, 2022. "Governing Europe's forests for multiple ecosystem services: Opportunities, challenges, and policy options," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Ana Nieto Masot & Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Luis Manuel Costa Moreno, 2019. "Principal Component Analysis of the LEADER Approach (2007–2013) in South Western Europe (Extremadura and Alentejo)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Enabling Factors for Better Multiplier Effects of the LEADER Programme: Lessons from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Pato Lúcia, 2020. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation Towards Rural Development Evidence from a Peripheral Area in Portugal," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 209-220, June.
    7. Dawson, Lucas & Angelstam, Per, 2026. "What do stakeholders want from multifunctional forest landscapes and can bottom-up collaborations help them to get it?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Marina Novikova, 2022. "Social Innovation Impacts and Their Assessment: An Exploratory Study of a Social Innovation Initiative from a Portuguese Rural Region," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, March.
    9. Ievoli Corrado & Belliggiano Angelo & Marandola Danilo & Milone Pierluigi & Ventura Flaminia, 2019. "Information and Communication Infrastructures and New Business Models in Rural Areas: The Case of Molise Region in Italy," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(4), pages 475-496, December.
    10. Belliggiano Angelo & Sturla Alberto & Vassallo Marco & Viganò Laura, 2020. "Neo-Endogenous Rural Development in Favor of Organic Farming: Two Case Studies from Italian Fragile Areas," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, March.
    11. Francisco Manuel Martínez García & Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Ana Nieto Masot, 2024. "Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) on the Development of Rural Territories: Principal Component Analysis in SW Spain, Extremadura (2007–2020)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Tymoshenko, Mykola, . "Ідентифікація Проблем І Перспективи Розвитку Соціальної Інфраструктури Сільських Територій України," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 4(2).
    13. Novikova Marina & de Fátima Ferreiro Maria & Stryjakiewicz Tadeusz, 2020. "Local Development Initiatives as Promoters of Social Innovation: Evidence from Two European Rural Regions," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(2), pages 43-53, June.
    14. Nadiia Davydenko & Natalia Wasilewska & Svitlana Boiko & Mirosław Wasilewski, 2022. "Development of Rural Areas in Ukraine in the Context of Decentralization: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    15. Néstor Vercher, 2022. "Environmental Conflicts and Social Innovation on the Balearic Islands (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Higuera, Héctor Javier García & Rogelja, Todora & Secco, Laura, 2023. "Policy framework as a challenge and opportunity for social innovation initiatives in eco-tourism in Colombia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Néstor Vercher, 2022. "Territorial Social Innovation and Alternative Food Networks: The Case of a New Farmers’ Cooperative on the Island of Ibiza (Spain)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Angelo Belliggiano & Eugenio Cejudo Garcia & Marilena Labianca & Francisco Navarro Valverde & Stefano De Rubertis, 2020. "The “Eco-Effectiveness” of Agritourism Dynamics in Italy and Spain: A Tool for Evaluating Regional Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Pere Serra & Montserrat Pallares-Barbera & Luca Salvati, 2023. "Can a long-term economic subsidy counteract rural depopulation? An empirical analysis from two spanish regions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3065-3084, August.
    20. Pollermann, Kim & Fynn, Lynn-Livia & Schwarze, Stefan, 2021. "What are favouring conditions for the implementation of innovative projects in Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) approaches?," EconStor Conference Papers 228489, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6439-:d:823395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.